Sign In Join 



GM News, New Models and Market Share

8237 messages,  Last post on Nov 22, 2009 at 8:40 AM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Automotive News


Messages Page 343 of 824
1
...
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
...
824
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#3417 of 8237
Re: List of crappy? [dieselone] by circlew
Jan 14, 2009 (7:13 am)
Reply

Replying to: dieselone (Jan 14, 2009 6:29 am)

In this case the dealer repaired the truck. Obviously, it wasn't that technical of an issue.
 
Regards,
OW
#3418 of 8237
Re:dealer issue [62vetteefp] by circlew
Jan 14, 2009 (7:17 am)
Reply

Replying to: 62vetteefp (Jan 14, 2009 6:43 am)

You find this hard to believe? Wow.
 
You need to get out more. You need a lawyer and a financial adviser when you go for service at my GMC dealer!
 
Regards,
OW
#3419 of 8237
Re: List of crappy? [circlew] by dave8697
Jan 14, 2009 (9:31 am)
Reply

Replying to: circlew (Jan 14, 2009 4:22 am)

maintaining market share requires growing sales due to population increases.
what if all airlines that are losing money were liquidated through bankruptcy. That would leave a few carriers. how would we all like it if then there were a 1 in 10 chance we could fly to a desired destination? Would anybody support a bailout of the airlines or would I-75 and I-95 become parking lots? What would happen to the D3 when rental fleets at airports were just sitting? Since they are such bad cars would it not matter?
 
I think hybrids are not the final solution and GM is smart enough to know that as well. To make money selling them, $4k has to be added to the car price. The interest on the extra $4k is $280 a year. The ins. is probably another $200 a year, the $4k spread over 60 months is another $66 a month, and in my state there is $280 more sales tax in year one and an excise tax of about $50 a year for many years on the extra $4k. Bottom line is they don't pan out unless you drive 25k miles a year and gas stays out of it's current price slump. Then you still only have a very marginal savings and may have given up some utility to get it.
#3420 of 8237
Re: List of crappy? [dave8697] by circlew
Jan 14, 2009 (9:40 am)
Reply

Replying to: dave8697 (Jan 14, 2009 9:31 am)

Unless Uncle Sam gives a sizeable tax rebate/credit to go Hybrid.
 
Regards,
OW
#3421 of 8237
Re: List of crappy? [dave8697] by tlong
Jan 14, 2009 (9:51 am)
Reply

Replying to: dave8697 (Jan 14, 2009 9:31 am)

I think hybrids are not the final solution and GM is smart enough to know that as well. To make money selling them, $4k has to be added to the car price.
 
I thought the two-mode hybrid was more like an additional $10K, so your figures are very conservative. It's not worth it.
#3422 of 8237
Re: Sales up for January? [gagrice] by lemko
Jan 14, 2009 (9:53 am)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Jan 13, 2009 3:47 pm)

I'm sure there are millions of unemployed and underemployed people who would be willing to build cars. The problem is, can they build cars? I'm sure it's nowhere as easy to build them as people make it out to be. There needs to be people willing to train all these unskilled people. The quality of the initial cars built by these novices is going to be abominable. A drunken, drugged-up lazy UAW worker with a severe head injury could build a better car than the most earnest unskilled illegal immigrant.
#3423 of 8237
Re: List of crappy? [dave8697] by anythngbutgm
Jan 14, 2009 (9:57 am)
Reply

Replying to: dave8697 (Jan 14, 2009 9:31 am)

I think hybrids are not the final solution and GM is smart enough to know that as well.
 
Maybe not, but Toyota managed to find 241 thousand takers last year alone. And if GM were "smart enough", they wouldn't have slapped a few of their own pathetic attempts together to try and compete for those sales. They also would have been even smarter if they stuck to their guns and stayed out since they were neither up to snuff (underperforming compared to thier non-hybrid counterparts) and had big problems with battery leaks.
#3424 of 8237
Economist sees modified bankruptcy ahead for GM by dtownfb
Jan 14, 2009 (10:59 am)
Reply
Economist sees modified bankruptcy ahead for GM
 
Jesse Snyder
Automotive News
January 13, 2009 - 10:15 am ET
UPDATED: 01/13/09 4:59 ET
 
DETROIT -- General Motors is likely to need a modified version of bankruptcy to restructure the last part of its debt, says Deutsche Bank Managing Director Rod Lache.
 
"The chances are greater than not that there will be bankruptcy, at least for GM," Lache said here today at a Society of Automotive Analysts conference. "But it won't be the disruptive, scary bankruptcy that suppliers fear."
Subscribe to Automotive News
 
Lache said GM must restructure $62 billion in debt, including converting $30 billion in unsecured debt into $10 billion in new bonds and $20 billion in equity. But about 20 percent of unsecured bondholders won't convert voluntarily, he said.
 
"GM must get a Bankruptcy Court to order that," Lache said. But it won't be a messy, complicated process, he predicted.
 
Lache expects GM to renegotiate its contract with the UAW and persuade the union to convert into new equity GM's scheduled $20 billion in contributions to a union-run trust fund known as a Voluntary Employee Beneficiary Association, or VEBA.
 
But Lache predicts that without a court order, GM can't get all parties to agree to its debt restructuring. Without sacrifices from all parties, the other agreements will collapse, he said.
 
"Without that, labor may not agree to make its sacrifices, and a federal car czar may not approve the package," he said, referring to the yet-to-be appointed administrator of the auto industry rescue effort.
 
With or without a bankruptcy, GM's shareholders will lose all or most of their investment, Lache said. If creditors agree to swap their existing debt for mostly equity of perhaps $40 billion, existing debtors would see GM's current market capitalization of $2.5 billion dilute further.
 
"But if it goes to bankruptcy, the court would almost certainly eliminate all shareholder equity," Lache said. "Shareholders may get something if GM restructures. But if it goes to bankruptcy, they'll get zero."
#3425 of 8237
Anyone want to verify those claims? by anythngbutgm
Jan 14, 2009 (11:06 am)
Reply
Friend of mine in the industry says all voice mail at GM headquarters is turned off, is this true? Are they really trying to shut out thier suppliers? I know his company is pretty peeved at them right now. I'm sure they're not the only ones who are getting shafted.
#3426 of 8237
Re: Anyone want to verify those claims? [anythngbutgm] by 62vetteefp
Jan 14, 2009 (11:38 am)
Reply

Replying to: anythngbutgm (Jan 14, 2009 11:06 am)

Friend of mine in the industry says all voice mail at GM headquarters is turned off, is this true? Are they really trying to shut out thier suppliers? I know his company is pretty peeved at them right now. I'm sure they're not the only ones who are getting shafted.
 
yes voice mails are being turned off but they are being turned off with the phone. Some had both a land line with voice mail and a cell phone with voice mail. They are going to one.

Messages Page 343 of 824
1
...
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
...
824
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement