Sign In Join 



GM News, New Models and Market Share

8237 messages,  Last post on Nov 22, 2009 at 8:40 AM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Automotive News


Messages Page 331 of 825
1
...
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
...
825
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#3294 of 8237
Re: Volt battery production location [62vetteefp] by tlong
Jan 11, 2009 (7:55 pm)
Reply

Replying to: 62vetteefp (Jan 11, 2009 2:08 pm)

GENERAL MOTORS will announce Monday that it will make lithium-ion battery packs to power the 2011 Chevrolet Volt and other extended-range electric vehicles at a new facility in Michigan. With the announcement, to be made during press preview days for the North American International Auto Show by Rick Wagoner, the company’s chairman and chief executive, G.M. becomes the first major automaker with a commitment to producing the advanced battery packs in the United States.
 
If that is going to be UAW labor then I can see another world of hurt. Assuming the Volt actually sells much. If it does then the UAW will probably strike.
#3295 of 8237
Re: List of crappy? [tlong] by plekto
Jan 11, 2009 (8:55 pm)
Reply

Replying to: tlong (Jan 11, 2009 7:48 pm)

I know I'd rather have a Buick Lucerne CXS/LaCrosse CXS(new version aka Lucerne 2.0, not the old one) any day over an Accord or anything Ford makes. And the Camry and Avalon are bland horrid things.
 
I'd frankly put the new Buick as a direct competitor to the Lexus or E class. It's fast, and that magnetic ride technology is the same that's used in the Corvette. It really transforms the car into a serious European feel/ride.
 
Yes, Gm has some of the best cars. The problem is that they also have tons of detritus and bloat that's causing them to keep sinking. And, no GM doesn't need a small car. THey would do best in fact by avoiding the cheap and small cars entirely. They can't win against them, and they make no profit. Jaguar for instance never went the budget route, either, and did fairly well for decades. Porsche as well, in their own way.
 
I'd rather have a GM with 20 unique and hot cars that we all want and lust after, and nothing else.
#3296 of 8237
Re: List of crappy? [plekto] by tlong
Jan 11, 2009 (11:42 pm)
Reply

Replying to: plekto (Jan 11, 2009 8:55 pm)

And, no GM doesn't need a small car. THey would do best in fact by avoiding the cheap and small cars entirely. They can't win against them, and they make no profit. Jaguar for instance never went the budget route, either, and did fairly well for decades. Porsche as well, in their own way.
 
Great comments, but gotta disagree here. IMHO one of the reasons Toyota and Honda are so successful is that they have not neglected their entry-level cars - they are generally better than the competition's. Honda, particularly, has done a great job with the Fit and the Civic. The first car for a teenager builds brand loyalty and that translates often to many more new car sales in the future. If the entry-level car is junk then the driver is going to look for something else next time.
 
There is also a lucrative small premium car segment that GM has completely ignored. There are a lot of sales of A4s, BMW3s, Lexus IS's, high end Jettas, TSX's, even Mini Coopers -- and GM has nothing in this segment. Most of those vehicles are priced evenly with some of GMs midsized or large cars. GM would certainly be able to generate a profit from a small car that sells for $35K.
 
I'd rather have a GM with 20 unique and hot cars that we all want and lust after, and nothing else.
 
Completely agree. GM has focused on quantity (lots of divisions, lots of models, lots of rebadges, lots of rental fodder). They are beginning to focus as much energy on the vehicles themselves rather than how many models they can make. Fewer excellent vehicles will make them more successful. Look at Honda - not that many models, yet very successful.
#3297 of 8237
Re: List of crappy? [tlong] by 62vetteefp
Jan 12, 2009 (4:04 am)
Reply

Replying to: tlong (Jan 11, 2009 7:48 pm)

As you know I understand perfectly. There will be bias against GM for a long time but it can go a bit far but that is the way it will be. For many they will have to find some reason to cut down GM, but it gets pretty bad when it is about the badge.
#3298 of 8237
Re: small car [tlong] by 62vetteefp
Jan 12, 2009 (4:09 am)
Reply

Replying to: tlong (Jan 11, 2009 11:42 pm)

GM absolutely needs some small cars and, with a global company, can supply with profit. As with the competitors it can bring them in from overseas. There is no way any US assembler can get the $3/hour wages that will make them profitable here. Just because a car is smaller does not mean it will use fewer assemblers or cost that much less. It has the same number of parts, takes the same number of engineers, same cost in tooling (approximately), etc. The only difference is the weight of the materials.
#3299 of 8237
Re: List of crappy? [62vetteefp] by imidazol97
Jan 12, 2009 (5:27 am)
Reply

Replying to: 62vetteefp (Jan 12, 2009 4:04 am)

> There will be bias against GM for a long time
>but it can go a bit far
 
But some of the bias is from feelings about cars from the 70s and 80s, perhaps earned. But it's almost a religion for a few people. They don't look at the current actual product; instead they constantly criticize almost like politics. What's interesting is the difference in forums and how they'll allow GM-bashing continually but in contrast will step in to squelch long-lasting criticism of Honda and Toyota, e.g., sludge discussions. The feeling is that GM deserves continuing criticism for the past.
 
A big factor in the willingness to forgive faults of the foreign models from the past and present is in how the companies handled the 80s and 90s sales of their cars. I was listening to 3 dealer owners/managers being a part of a discussion during the bail out discussion on a Louisville radio station. They pointed out the car sale was the difference; for the foreign brands (then) it was arch important to keep the owner bringing the car back to the dealer for the service and proper maintenance (and fixes of things to avoid having to issue recalls). Counterpoint to this was the US brands who sold the car and the car was sometimes serviced properly and often wasn't. Then when things failed because of not having been repaired or maintained, the car company is blamed. The three described the foreign car sale as the PROCESS of ownership rather than just the sale, hence the better feeling about the cars on the part of the owners.
 
In other words the US manufacturers goofed in competing with the new foreign brands of that era by not making it a requirement to bring vehicles back for regular service to handle the things that needed changing along with the oil change.
#3300 of 8237
Re: List of crappy? [imidazol97] by gagrice
Jan 12, 2009 (5:52 am)
Reply

Replying to: imidazol97 (Jan 12, 2009 5:27 am)

it was arch important to keep the owner bringing the car back to the dealer for the service and proper maintenance (and fixes of things to avoid having to issue recalls). Counterpoint to this was the US brands who sold the car and the car was sometimes serviced properly and often wasn't.
 
I prefer to take my vehicle to the dealers for service. I believe BMW, MB & VW are now offering free service through the warranty period. GM should consider that. My last GMC was serviced free by the dealer with coupons sent out. I would rather they just offered it when the car is purchased. Toyota way overcharges for their service. They also very nicely tell you they will not fix things that need to be addressed. I don't believe I will use them for future non warranty service. Last time they charged me $60 for generic 30 weight oil. Wanted an additional $70 for no name synthetic. Previous GM PU trucks were generally serviced for a very nominal fee and sometimes waved, even though I bought the truck out of state. My last 20 years experience with the domestic service was much better than the last two vehicles from Toyota.
#3301 of 8237
Re: List of crappy? [carnaught] by lemko
Jan 12, 2009 (6:15 am)
Reply

Replying to: carnaught (Jan 11, 2009 11:30 am)

The Buick badge is just fine as long as it connotes that it's MY BUICK!!! When Better Automobiles are Built, Buick Will Build Them!
#3302 of 8237
Re: List of crappy? [62vetteefp] by lemko
Jan 12, 2009 (6:22 am)
Reply

Replying to: 62vetteefp (Jan 11, 2009 12:23 pm)

The dealership experience is excellent at our Buick dealership. The salesman was low-key and low pressure. My girlfriend got an excellent deal on her LaCrosse and this was long before all these incentives and "Red Tag" stuff. They still service my old Park Avenue from time to time.
 
Loud? Heck, there are a lot of adjectives to describe a Buick, but "loud" isn't one.
 
MPG sucks? Sheesh, I'm getting 29 MPG out of a 21 year-old car and my girlfriend's car is doing better.
 
The badge sucks? Sheesh! What the heck do the others look like? Toyota's looks like it was drawn with a Spirograph and Nissan's looks like a hamburger!
#3303 of 8237
Re: List of crappy? [bpizzuti] by lemko
Jan 12, 2009 (6:25 am)
Reply

Replying to: bpizzuti (Jan 11, 2009 1:38 pm)

Actually, Cadillac did update it's badge in 2000 or thereabouts. I like the old logo better myself.

Messages Page 331 of 825
1
...
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
...
825
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement