Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Automotive News & Views GM News, New Models and Market Share
8236 messages, Last post on Nov 21, 2009 at 6:00 PM
You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires
|
Replying to: 62vetteefp (Dec 01, 2008 6:11 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: steve_ (Dec 02, 2008 7:25 am) VW, Toyota, Nissan, Porsche, Audi, Mercedes, Subaru, and many other makes are doing okay, because they didn't go into this "financial storm" in bad-shape, and they understand that economies fluctuate and they need to plan for good and bad times. For instance many Toyota plants look at a slow-down as an opportunity for everyone to learn new skills, and to analyze and improve the whole plant's processes thru Kaizen events.
|
|
|
Replying to: kernick (Dec 02, 2008 8:28 am) If I recall correctly, it was Ford that was first of Big 3 that looked at and started to adopt some of Japan's quality/process improvement methods. They had a slogan of, "Quality is Job One". Believe that American manufacturers took notice of Japanese quality and techniques in late 80's. But, what is amazing about the culture of GM and its leadership is that they condoned and agreed to things like jobs banks instead of viewing downturns in sales as an opportunity to train/retrain/update skills.
|
|
|
Replying to: xrunner2 (Dec 02, 2008 8:41 am) http://www.assemblymag.com/Articles/Blog/BNP_GUID_9-5-2006_A_1000000000000045712- 5 This magazine - Assembly, is fairly good if you're into manufacturing methods and continuous improvement, like I am. They do run positive articles on many American companies, but it is mainly based on technology, and not methods. I believe most American manufacturers union agreements keep them from innovating like the non-union factories can. A non-union workplace, can change and improve faster than a union workplace, and thus has a distinct "agility" advantage.
|
|
|
Replying to: kernick (Dec 02, 2008 9:33 am) Within last couple of weeks, saw a network tv news program where a guest showed the host the UAW contract agreement with GM - a 2,200 page document and it looked like the pages were 8.5x11. What nonsense. This would have been funny stuff on a Monty Python episode. First and mid-level manager and engineers need to have flexibility and lattitude in designing, updating, implementing processes (through technology and methods) without encumbrances of union work rules. Assembly line and other workers of course should always be part of and have representation with engineering groups/teams responsible for the various processes. Wonder how this happens at GM vs Toyota. Big question will be about reprogramming of UAW workers if GM goes down. Perhaps younger workers might be more open to a Toyota/Honda non-union way of doing things. Have any former hard-core UAW workers been hired by non-union Honda/Toyota plants and how are they doing. But, process improvement can only go so far to help corporation bottom line if high management decides to build something that very few want such as Aztek, SSR, etc. or wages/benefits too high relative to competition. |
|
|
Replying to: imidazol97 (Dec 02, 2008 4:23 am) Congress did the right thing last time, like it or not. Regards, OW
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: circlew (Dec 02, 2008 11:23 am) ">Most of those Congress who made comments are idiots on what is going on and grandstanding and have no idea what they are talking about. "That's the truth. The "hearings" (political speeches) should have been led by facilitators such as the fellow discussed in the few previous posts with knowledge of the auto industry instead of politicians. I said that in previous posts. We'd be a lot further along in re what we could do and should do to save our auto industry from further damage from the imports"
|
|
|
Replying to: circlew (Dec 02, 2008 11:23 am) What's that TV show - Are You as Smart as a 3rd Grader?" ? Well the CEO's weren't even smart enough to say "the dog ate it!" Maybe they should have sent car-show babes in their slinky dresses, if all they were going to do was beg? I know a few Congressmen who would have given them the $.  Anyway I guess they learned to showup with a plan. But a plan in itself is no major accomplishment, as we could write a plan if we put together some of the last few hundred posts. I myself don't see how GM can make money unless you assume sales are going back to 16M units anytime soon. The $25B will not last even a year; Ford wants $9B, leaving $16B for GM and Chrysler. What's GM losing per month $2B? $2.5B maybe in Nov. with a 41% drop in sales? So given that the clock is ticking, who thinks GM can make all the changes necessary in 6-8 months, to make a profit before using all the money they're asking for? My opinion from my math calculations, is that $25B would be needed every 6 months, at least for 2 years, even if GM presents a good plan, and the economy improves to 2007 levels by 2010. But then again why does Chrysler need money when their "parents" Cerberus has money, or could sell them to someone who has money? BTW how many of you have seen that Chrysler is suing Mercedes over the sale. Apparently Cerberus didn't do their homework back when considering to buy Chrysler, and now they want the courts to bail them out of their bad decision.
|
|
|
Replying to: imidazol97 (Dec 02, 2008 12:12 pm) Save our auto industry?? The damage is self-inflicted. Do you really believe people have shunned the Detroit 3 because they are unpatriotic or immoral?? Bad Business Model...bad decisions...greed and high costs.  Regards, OW
|
|
|
Replying to: kernick (Dec 02, 2008 12:24 pm) Hopefully, the government can set up a new Board of Directors to oversee the spend. Regards, OW
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views GM News, New Models and Market Share
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
