Sign In Join 



GM News, New Models and Market Share

8065 messages,  Last post on Nov 11, 2009 at 3:04 AM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Automotive News


Messages Page 236 of 807
1
...
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
...
807
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#2347 of 8065
Re: Pontiac, Saab, Saturn [andre1969] by 62vetteefp
Nov 29, 2008 (6:24 pm)
Reply

Replying to: andre1969 (Nov 29, 2008 4:14 pm)

"Well, when Hertz, Avis, Rent-A-Wreck, etc buys a Buick, how do they get factored into the average buyer age? "
 
Very good point. The sales are retail only so if the sedans are 1/2 fleet then that really changes my calcs but in the end the average buyer for Buick retail is still 55. Fleet sales of Buick is way down but surely who knows with what has been happening lately. Perhaps the rentals are not even buying now due to lack of credit?
#2348 of 8065
Re: [m4d_cow] by 62vetteefp
Nov 29, 2008 (6:31 pm)
Reply

Replying to: m4d_cow (Nov 29, 2008 11:41 am)

"Kill all incompetent models. That means trash cars like Monte Carlo, Suburban and Equinox goes, as well as SRX, STS and XLR. Kill Hummer H3, Hummer fashionists expect Hummers to be big, tough and bad, the H3 doesnt deliver such image. "
 
Suburban incompetent? What are you talking about? One of the best vehicles on the market if you need a real hauler.
 
Monte Carlo has been gone a couple years now.
 
SRX was a great vehicle but just never had a real segment with volume. C&D 10 best vehicle. It is gone though with a more traditional SUV/CUV type vehicle replacing it.
 
Hummer is up for sale and will be gone soon.
 
"Traverse's 14 mpg will scare buyers off faster than Osama in downtown NY,"
Traverse will sell like mad as do the rest of the Lambdas.
#2349 of 8065
Re: What Buick needs to do... [carnaught] by iwant12
Nov 29, 2008 (6:46 pm)
Reply

Replying to: carnaught (Nov 29, 2008 2:50 pm)

Sadly, carnaught, you are right.
#2350 of 8065
Re: What Buick needs to do... [carnaught] by 62vetteefp
Nov 29, 2008 (6:50 pm)
Reply

Replying to: carnaught (Nov 29, 2008 2:50 pm)

If they kill Pontiac look for the G8 to be renamed GN.
#2351 of 8065
Re: [62vetteefp] by andre1969
Nov 29, 2008 (6:59 pm)
Reply

Replying to: 62vetteefp (Nov 29, 2008 6:31 pm)

Is the Equinox really that bad? I actually kinda like them, although I always thought the 3.4 was kind of a weak point? Couldn't you get them with the 3.5 for awhile? I just checked Edmund's listings, and now it looks like you can only get the 3.4 or the 3.6.
 
On the plus side, I thought the Equinox was really roomy, given its external dimensions. And the interior, while nothing to rave about, at least wasn't embarrassing. One of my friends was in the market for a smallish SUV a few years back, and I rode with him when he test drove an Equinox. It had the 3.4, but for as crude and underpowered as it's supposed to be, it seemed okay when he gunned it to get on the highway.
 
I drove an Equinox at a GM test drive event when they first came out. It was on a closed course where you could get a bit spirited with it. It did seem sort of wallowy in the turns, like something I could flip over if I really put my mind to it. Oddly, I put the Suburban and Tahoe through the same course, and they felt much more nimble. I wonder if that was just the RWD versus FWD thing going on? Plus, I'm sort of used to land yachts, so maybe I just felt more at home in one of those?
 
If Pontiac gets the axe, I hope Buick or someone else does pick up the G8. It's a bit out of my price range, and a little thirstier than I'd want if I bought a brand-new car, but for its size and power it's pretty impressive. And reasonably priced.
#2352 of 8065
Re: [andre1969] by gagrice
Nov 29, 2008 (7:36 pm)
Reply

Replying to: andre1969 (Nov 29, 2008 6:59 pm)

I drove an Equinox at a GM test drive event when they first came out.
 
I rented an Equinox for two weeks in April. They did not have a Trail Blazer for me when I arrived. They did discount it $91 for the two weeks so I survived. It is pure JUNK. Poor handling, poor braking, noisy and maybe 1-2 MPG better than the much nicer Trail Blazer. I wanted to rent an Escalade. They are always out when I want one. The Equinox would be tough with four people and luggage.
#2353 of 8065
Re: [62vetteefp] by torque_r
Nov 29, 2008 (8:29 pm)
Reply

Replying to: 62vetteefp (Nov 29, 2008 6:31 pm)

" SRX was a great vehicle but just never had a real segment with volume. C&D 10 best vehicle. It is gone though with a more traditional SUV/CUV type vehicle replacing it. "
 
I agree the SRX is a great vehicle. It never really sold well because it looks more of a station wagon than an SUV.
 
Now the sad part is this: GM seems to be doing to Cadillac what Ford did to Lincoln. Cadillac is sharing more platforms with Chevy. The 2010 SRX will be based on the Equinox/Vue/Terrain. Why? Why not the CTS platform? Is it to save cost in the typical GM way?
 
What's worse, Motor Trend is reporting that next Escalade will be the FIFTH Lambda.
#2354 of 8065
LOL!!! by nippononly
Nov 29, 2008 (10:11 pm)
Reply
They are seriously going to sell a fifth Lambda? And worse yet, call it a Cadillac?
 
I will second the opinion that Equinox was truly an awful vehicle, especially by comparison with its peers, even when it was new. There is a reason Escape has sold like crazy and the Equinox/Torrent has been a rental special since its inception.
 
Truly one of GM's worst efforts among the vehicles still available today. Of course it came out, what, 4 or 5 years ago? So perhaps that was the last of the OLD GM.
 
If they present this plan for the bailout and it goes ahead, I think GM will benefit tremendously. And Chevy could pick up the couple of Pontiacs that people might actually miss, like the Solstice and Vibe, which both should have been Chevys right from the beginning. The next thing on the horizon should be importing the Buicks from China to bring costs down.
#2355 of 8065
Picked up a Sonoma by dave8697
Nov 29, 2008 (11:40 pm)
Reply
V6 ext cab '99 model. The seller got an Equinox that I rode in. He was getting upper 20's for mileage. I got 25.5 mpg from the 4.3 powered ext cab truck with automatic on trip home from buying it (1200 miles). Trailblazers might squeeze out 24 hwy with 2WD with 4.0 L6. I always got 23mpg hwy from my 4.3 V6 Chev Astros, so I figure with 20 year newer engine tech and a smaller engine and smaller vehicle, the trailblazer could muster 1 more mpg.
#2356 of 8065
Re: [62vetteefp] by bpizzuti
Nov 30, 2008 (3:01 am)
Reply

Replying to: 62vetteefp (Nov 29, 2008 6:31 pm)

Suburban incompetent? What are you talking about? One of the best vehicles on the market if you need a real hauler.
 
The Suburban is an ancient replacement that is no longer needed, unless you need to carry seven passengers AND a ton of cargo AND tow a boat or something like that. That's a very niche market that not many will put up with after $5 per gallon gas (the few people I knew with Suburbans took them off the road during the spike...they couldn't afford to drive them).
 
Name one thing the Suburban can do better than a crew-cab truck or a 7 passenger Lambda...those that don't need towing will take the Lambda, and those that do need it will go grab an F-series from Ford. The Suburban is a concept who's time has passed I'm thinking. And think what dropping it would do for GM's CAFE too. Those things are what, 10 MPG highway? May as well sell them as Hummers...

Messages Page 236 of 807
1
...
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
...
807
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement