Sign In Join 



GM News, New Models and Market Share

8078 messages,  Last post on Nov 11, 2009 at 9:27 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Automotive News


Messages Page 196 of 809
1
...
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
...
809
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#1943 of 8078
Couple of things by anythngbutgm
Nov 11, 2008 (6:09 am)
Reply
There are still some fishy things going on with this whole "GM in trouble" thing that don't make sense.
 
First, if GM is in such bad shape, why is 95% of the ad space here at Edmunds sponsered by them? I mean, it's been nothing but GM ads on here for at least the past year. Same goes for the other car sites I visit. Surely, they still have a large advertising budget?
 
Second, GM also just announced a new plant opening in Russia to the tune of 300 million dollars to pump out Cruzes and SUV's. Where is this money coming from?
 
Also, (This one irks me the most) why is it that now that GM is supposedly "in trouble", the fear mongering is rampant calling for a "total collapse of the American economy" or (Lemko's apocolypse come true) yet when the news of Chryslers eminent demise/sale/dismantling not even 1 month ago, the reactions were nothing more than
 
...meh, Chryslers done for, so what
 
Are they just not that vital to the American economy as much as the General is? How come their demise would have next to zero effect while the loss of GM in this country would turn this place into a third world disaster area?
 
Same goes for Ford, whom over the years has had its own share of ups and downs yet, nobody is dreading it's demise and the effects it would have on the economy or the thousands of its employees?
 
Are both of these companies expendable?
 
Anyways, I'm not rooting for anybody to go out of business, and would like to see a bright future for the American automakers, even if it means doing the right thing and restructuring through BK but sometimes the priorities on this dilema can be downright baffling.
#1944 of 8078
Re: Couple of things [anythngbutgm] by bvdj84
Nov 11, 2008 (7:14 am)
Reply

Replying to: anythngbutgm (Nov 11, 2008 6:09 am)

The bummer part is, GM is going to pinch pennies, and guess where they are going to use those pennies from? Yes, more than likely taking the quality they have on their cars, which is little, and saving money on parts.lol. Honestly, only a few cars they offer have definitive quality, the rest all feel like rentals.
 
Like I stated before, now is not the time to introduce a new car, they need a restructure first.
#1945 of 8078
Re: Couple of things [anythngbutgm] by 62vetteefp
Nov 11, 2008 (7:15 am)
Reply

Replying to: anythngbutgm (Nov 11, 2008 6:09 am)

Chrysler is important but is such a small player (volume wise) that they would not have the impact GM would. Also the fact that it is owned by a Cererbus, an investment company which seems to have a lot of money, also probably takes some of the media off it.
 
The entire industry was caught by surprise 3 months ago by the credit issue. This came on suddenly. Even Toyota is very surprised at the loss in business and they may even make no money this coming year in the US.
 
So everyone was going forward with their business such as opening a plant in Russia where sales are going gonzo. One year ago inside GM everything was looking up. The UAW issue was evened out with the competitors, the health care issues were evening up, the quality was evened up and MPG was evened up.
 
But with sales suddenly in the dumper all the cash flow to pay the bills stopped. No credit is really killing the entire market. Even the $700 Billion is doing little because the companies that got it are sitting on it. I think it was a mistake to give it to them because they did not do anything with it as the were supposed to. Our wise congress jsut gave them free money with what looks like no strings attached.
 
So the bottom line is our entire industry, and our entire country was surprised by what happened. No one is buying anything. We are going into a world wide depression if it goes much further.
 
As far as the marketing, Marketers make media buys months in advance. Money is already spent.
 
Now Ford is in a better position because they "sold" all their assets (plants, buildings, etc.) a year ago for credit. They are now living on all that credit. GM still owns everything but in todays credit crunch they cannot get anything for them.
#1946 of 8078
Re: Couple of things [bvdj84] by 62vetteefp
Nov 11, 2008 (7:19 am)
Reply

Replying to: bvdj84 (Nov 11, 2008 7:14 am)

Which cars are rentals to you? Most all GMs vehicles are now competitive in both interior appearance and overall quality. I will again list the ones I feel that are not competitive and they are the old vehicles that need redoing.
 
G6, mid sized Pick ups
 
Everything else is at least competitive with the top players.
#1947 of 8078
Re: my take [cooterbfd] by gagrice
Nov 11, 2008 (7:43 am)
Reply

Replying to: cooterbfd (Nov 11, 2008 5:50 am)

Remember, the first $25 billion is meant more as a "grant" for improved technologies like battery storage systems
 
Yes the first $25 billion was offered just as you say as part of the Energy bill. It did have specific ties. Refurbishing old plants in the USA & alternative technologies to be built in the USA. It was not specific for the Big 3. HonToy could also apply for money from that pool if they met the criteria.
 
The $50 billion is a bailout and I have not seen any mention of paying it back. Other than it may be considered part ownership. I would say the Big 3 bailout is not going to happen now that Obama has leaked details of his meeting with Bush. The Big 3 can lay everyone off over the holidays to try and keep enough cash flowing. If the UAW will not agree they can just file for chapter 11 and let the chips fall where they will. They have plenty of stock at the dealers to last several months. Maybe a lot longer. See what sells over Christmas and reopen the plants that are building what the people are buying. With the economy and the warnings I would think that most of the Big 3 employees would have saved enough to last 6 months without a paycheck. We are in for some hard times and 30% or 40% of nothing is still nothing. That is about where the Big 3 are sitting.
#1948 of 8078
Re: Couple of things [anythngbutgm] by plekto
Nov 11, 2008 (8:05 am)
Reply

Replying to: anythngbutgm (Nov 11, 2008 6:09 am)

First, if GM is in such bad shape, why is 95% of the ad space here at Edmunds sponsored by them? I mean, it's been nothing but GM ads on here for at least the past year. Same goes for the other car sites I visit. Surely, they still have a large advertising budget?
  
Second, GM also just announced a new plant opening in Russia to the tune of 300 million dollars to pump out Cruzes and SUV's. Where is this money coming from?

 
Exactly. They are doing *GREAT* in Europe and Asia. It's the U.S. market and Faustian deals they made with the UAW decades ago that are sucking them dry.
 
That money? It's all going overseas to increase profits where they are currently making said profits unless there's some real teeth in the package. But I fear that instead, we'll be left holding the bill and wondering what happened as plants still keep closing and everything is moved overseas.
 
In simple terms - GM and Ford are most likely planning to use this money to close everything in the U.S. and more it all to Europe, Mexico, and China(or Russia). That 25 billion with no strings attached? Probably will be used to pay off the pension fund so that they can be free of everyone as they close the last plants in the U.S.
 
Man our leaders are such idiots. This happened with electronics and computers and now it's happening with our vehicles.
#1949 of 8078
Re: my take [gagrice] by cooterbfd
Nov 11, 2008 (8:09 am)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Nov 11, 2008 7:43 am)

"..........The Big 3 can lay everyone off over the holidays to try and keep enough cash flowing. If the UAW will not agree they can just file for chapter 11 and let the chips fall where they will"
 
Do they really have that many days supply left????
 
Either way, they are between a rock and a hard place. I fear that a massive layoff, bankruptcy, or any such action will stifle sales, and sound a death knell.
 
But if somehow they could wrest 2% of GMAC from Cerebus........
#1950 of 8078
80 percent say no by xrunner2
Nov 11, 2008 (8:12 am)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Nov 11, 2008 7:43 am)

If the UAW will not agree they can just file for chapter 11 and let the chips fall where they will. They have plenty of stock at the dealers to last several months.
 
But, who will buy the vehicles. Saw an interview given last week by Wagoner. He talked about a number of studies done on consumers about bankruptcy. He said that 80 percent of potential car buyers would not buy a car from a company that announced bankruptcy.
#1951 of 8078
Re: 80 percent say no [xrunner2] by gagrice
Nov 11, 2008 (8:29 am)
Reply

Replying to: xrunner2 (Nov 11, 2008 8:12 am)

He said that 80 percent of potential car buyers would not buy a car from a company that announced bankruptcy.
 
That is encouraging. Only 20% of buyers are stupid. Or plan to get a car for half price and take their chances. I might give 50 cents on the dollar for a GM vehicle today. Knowing that I am on my own as far as service and repairs. How many dealerships are going to do warranty work if GM is in bankruptcy? They will be lucky to get rid of inventory. Rocky's brother bought an Impala, one of their better cars, for 35% off of MSRP. That dealer was tired of paying the flooring cost. Several big dealers are already in bankruptcy. $25 billion will only be a band-aid that prolongs the agony another few months.
#1952 of 8078
Re: Couple of things [62vetteefp] by kernick
Nov 11, 2008 (8:35 am)
Reply

Replying to: 62vetteefp (Nov 11, 2008 7:15 am)

The entire industry was caught by surprise 3 months ago by the credit issue.
 
Let's put this in terms of GM being a ship and the executives of GM being the officers.
 
The ship was in poor shape when the weather was good (economy growing), as it was sleaking water (losing money on daily operations and market-share declining). Now you're telling me the captain is surprised when the officers could see stormclouds gathering and a storm comes which is a normal occurrence (economic downturns occur every decade or 2). Yes it is bad storm, but the captain, officers and crew should have prepared for it. The consequences of bad leadership, planning, and execution are failure. They all need to go; we should not reward incompetence (or whatever you call it) and let it continue.

Messages Page 196 of 809
1
...
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
...
809
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement