Sign In Join 



GM News, New Models and Market Share

8603 messages,  Last post on Dec 05, 2009 at 7:41 AM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Automotive News


Messages Page 140 of 861
1
...
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
...
861
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#1384 of 8603
Re: 2007 -2008 Sports Sedans [circlew] by sls002
Sep 13, 2008 (11:29 am)
Reply

Replying to: circlew (Sep 13, 2008 8:16 am)

22 is not very good for the size of car that the 3-series is. Only marginally better than my SRX.
#1385 of 8603
Re: 2007 -2008 Sports Sedans [sls002] by circlew
Sep 13, 2008 (11:38 am)
Reply

Replying to: sls002 (Sep 13, 2008 11:29 am)

I get 27 on the highway. The SRX?
 
Got 29 round trip doing hypermiling on a trip to Penneylvania last month with 3 passengers. You?
 
Regards,
OW
#1386 of 8603
Re: 2007 -2008 Sports Sedans [circlew] by cooterbfd
Sep 13, 2008 (11:51 am)
Reply

Replying to: circlew (Sep 13, 2008 11:38 am)

I got 30 with 4 people in my Ultra going back and forth to Maine. Any Corolla sized car getting 29 is pathetic.
#1387 of 8603
Re: 2007 -2008 Sports Sedans [cooterbfd] by circlew
Sep 13, 2008 (12:05 pm)
Reply

Replying to: cooterbfd (Sep 13, 2008 11:51 am)

Yeah, but you slide completely off the road in a decreasing radius turn that is a breeze in this 330rolla. You get to .73 g and slide off! And your resale pays for my gas for about 3 months!
 
Regards,
OW
#1388 of 8603
Re: 2007 -2008 Sports Sedans [circlew] by cooterbfd
Sep 13, 2008 (12:14 pm)
Reply

Replying to: circlew (Sep 13, 2008 12:05 pm)

Nah, I got Portugese Stability control (my wife's fingernails) if I go over .68g. As for resale, a tan car w/ a green fender won't command much anyway. Besides, I like to get where I'm going in comfort.
#1389 of 8603
Re: 2007 -2008 Sports Sedans [circlew] by sls002
Sep 13, 2008 (12:42 pm)
Reply

Replying to: circlew (Sep 13, 2008 11:38 am)

My SRX can be found on the EPA website if you are interested.
So what was the 22 that you posted before, a typo or are you just incompetent.
#1390 of 8603
Re: 2007 -2008 Sports Sedans [cooterbfd] by circlew
Sep 13, 2008 (12:45 pm)
Reply

Replying to: cooterbfd (Sep 13, 2008 12:14 pm)

I gotta agree. My Mom's '01 BPA is a smooth ride and economical.
 
Regards,
OW
#1391 of 8603
Re: 2007 -2008 Sports Sedans [sls002] by circlew
Sep 13, 2008 (12:46 pm)
Reply

Replying to: sls002 (Sep 13, 2008 12:42 pm)

The 22 MPG is tank to tank economy for the 41K miles I've driven to date. A combined number, so to speak.
 
Regards,
OW
#1392 of 8603
Car and Driver Benchmark by circlew
Sep 14, 2008 (11:18 am)
Reply
2008 BMW 3-series

Elevating the benchmark.
 
Last year this bread-and-butter family of Bimmers scored its 16th-straight 10Best trophy, a record unmatched in the history of this event. And en route to its 17th-straight appearance, the 3-series added a new model, BMW’s first-ever hardtop convertible, and took top honors in two comparison tests: “Winds of Change?” [April 2007] and “40-Somethings” [June 2007].
 
The formula for these cars seems disarmingly simple: Ample power from a pair of ultra-smooth straight-six engines, one of them force-fed to the tune of 300 horsepower and 300 pound-feet of torque; suspension tuning that confidently combines supple ride quality with autocross responses; classic coupe and sedan proportions that have evolved gracefully since the 325i made its first 10Best appearance in 1992; supportive seats that could serve a trans-Nebraska cruise on I-80 or a BMW-club track day.
 
Simple, right? But in 17 years, no other carmaker has quite managed to package these attributes as successfully as BMW, although many have tried. Which is precisely why the 3-series continues to be the perennial benchmark of the entry luxury-sports-coupe, -sedan, -convertible class.

 
Regards,
OW
#1393 of 8603
just for kicks... by andre1969
Sep 14, 2008 (11:22 am)
Reply
I checked the EPA ratings for the 4-cyl/6-speed auto Malibu/Aura/G6 for 2009. It's rated at 22/33. The 2008 Malibu with that setup is rated at 22/32. A small difference I know, but it does have me curious. Did GM actually do something to the cars to make the slight highway improvement, or did the EPA just round off differently? Or heck, could be that the car wasn't changed for 2009, but the EPA just happened to re-test and get a slightly better figure.
 
Using the old EPA figures (I still can't get used to these newer, downrated numbers, even if they are supposedly more realistic), I'd imagine that would have been something like 25/36...pretty impressive IMO for a midsized car. Especially if you look back a few years and see how far they've come. A 1999 Malibu, with the 4 cyl/automatic (only a 4-speed) was rated at 19/28 (new ratings) or 22/30 (original window sticker)

Messages Page 140 of 861
1
...
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
...
861
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement