Sign In Join 



Buying Luxury used cars

411 messages,  Last post on Jul 13, 2009 at 10:22 AM

You are in the Classic Cars Forum. Your Host is mr_shiftright

What is this discussion about? Classic Cars, Coupe, Convertible, Truck, Sedan, Wagon


Messages Page 13 of 42
1
...
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
...
42
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#118 of 411
Why, of Course...(lemko) [andre1969] (Mr_Shiftright) by hpmctorque
Jan 07, 2009 (2:40 am)
Reply
"If Buicks were 'luxury' than what are Mercedes, Lexus, 7 Series BMWs, Bentley, etc. 'Super Luxury'? 'Ultra Luxury'?"
  
If Buick Park Avenue is luxury, then PA Ultra represents "Ultra Luxury." How could it be otherwise? Not ready to pass the Grey Poupon quite yet? Okay, then, if PA isn't quite luxury, but merely near-luxury, then PA Ultra crosses the line into luxury, no?
  
I'd say PA Ultra meets the definition of American luxury. As for "Super Luxury," Buick once had a "Super" in its lineup, but since it was less super than the mighty Roadmaster, then maybe it could have been categorized as "almost near-luxury."
#119 of 411
Re: Why, of Course...(lemko) [andre1969] (Mr_Shiftright) [hpmctorque] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Jan 07, 2009 (9:11 am)
Reply

Replying to: hpmctorque (Jan 07, 2009 2:40 am)

Luxury to me means rich, unattainable, special. The PA is just a mass-produced Buick with softer seats. I don't get the luxury part. How can luxury be common and ordinary? Makes no sense. Will we be talking about the luxury of the Malibu next? Hope not
#120 of 411
Re: Why, of Course...(lemko) [andre1969] (Mr_Shiftright) [hpmctorque] [Mr_S by andre1969
Jan 07, 2009 (10:10 am)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Jan 07, 2009 9:11 am)

Luxury to me means rich, unattainable, special. The PA is just a mass-produced Buick with softer seats. I don't get the luxury part. How can luxury be common and ordinary? Makes no sense.
 
I think the 70's, and the push for more luxurious cheaper cars, probably muddled a lot of people's ideas of what a luxury car should be. Also around that time, sales of more expensive cars just exploded. Lincoln and Cadillac both had some record sales years.
 
The main reason I'll still defend something like Lemko's Park Ave and my '79 New Yorker is because their forebears were luxury cars. Or at least, IMO they were. If you go back to, say, 1955, a New Yorker or Buick Roadmaster were very luxurious cars. They were still a step below a Cadillac or Imperial in price, although there was a bit of overlap with Lincoln. Well I always considered a Caddy, Lincoln, or Imperial to be a luxury car, so because the NYer and Roadmaster were close enough in price, I'd just lump them in as well, as the bottom end of the luxury market.
 
Back in those days, the Olds 98, while the top Olds, had very little in common with the Roadmaster. The Roadmaster shared the big C-body with the Cadillac. Actually the Super did as well, but it was much lower in price and not as well-appointed. More akin to a DeSoto Fireflite or Chrysler Windsor in price, IIRC. In contrast, the Olds was on the B-body, same as the 88 and the Buick Special/Century. They stretched the wheelbase to make it look more impressive, but managed to do it in a way that yielded no more interior room (a common trait back then ) The 98 was also priced more in the middle of the market in those days, again about on par with a DeSoto Fireflite.
 
As the years went on, though, the cheaper cars got nicer, while the nicer cars got cheaper. The Roadmaster was replaced by the Electra for 1959. That same year, the 98 went from the B-body to the C-body, so it became more of an equal to the senior Buick, and at the point I'd consider it a luxury car. But soon, cars like the Caprice, LTD, and VIP would be on the scene, with interiors that were as plush or plusher than some of the base trim levels of the Electra/98 and New Yorker. And when equipped with the right engine, performance would be as good or better.
 
The 1970's was when it really got convoluted, though. Ford launched the tacky, pretentious Granada, which was an instant hit. Mopar issued the Dart SE and Valiant Brougham, which had enough velour, shag, and thickly padded vinyl to out-rival a Cadillac or Lincoln. And they'd do more of the same with the Aspen SE and Volare Premier. GM put out luxury versions of the Nova, Skylark, et al. The impudence probably peaked with 1977, and the Lincoln Versailles. IIRC it was the priciest Lincoln that year, yet it was little more than a tarted up Granada, which itself was based on the humble Maverick...and I hear that can even be traced back to the Falcon.
 
People were definitely demanding more luxurious cars in the 1970's, especially in the later years. In the past, cars like the Chevrolet Caprice and Pontiac Bonneville had been relatively scarce compared to the mainstream Impala and Catalina. Yet in 1977, the market shifted and the Caprice and Bonneville were outselling the cheaper Impala and Catalina. Similarly, with Olds and Buick, the higher trim levels of the Delta 88 and LeSabre were outselling the cheaper models.
 
I guess that for all the whining about what a bad era that was, car buyers had enough disposable income to get into those pricier models. And while they were still upscale, plush cars, they were no longer relatively scarce, as they had been in the past. If anything, it was the more base level cars that were becoming the rarities.
#121 of 411
Re: Why, of Course...(lemko) [andre1969] (Mr_Shiftright) [hpmctorque] [Mr_S [andre1969] by texases
Jan 07, 2009 (10:14 am)
Reply

Replying to: andre1969 (Jan 07, 2009 10:10 am)

"I think the 70's, and the push for more luxurious cheaper cars"
 
Here's a question - I remember reading somewhere that Chevy/Olds/Buick fullsize cars added lots of available luxury features when the edict came down at GM that all division executives had to drive cars from their division. This created a need for 'luxurious' models. Does anyone know if there's any truth to this? (wish I could remember where I read it )
#122 of 411
Re: Why, of Course...(lemko) [andre1969] (Mr_Shiftright) [hpmctorque] [Mr_S by andre1969
Jan 07, 2009 (10:31 am)
Reply

Replying to: texases (Jan 07, 2009 10:14 am)

Yeah, I've heard that as well, that they required division execs to drive cars from their own divisions. That's the reason Pontiac ended up getting the Grand Ville, which was supposed to be in the same league as the Electra and 98. However, it was actually a bit of a sham. Instead of just taking a real C-body and putting Pontiac sheetmetal on it, they instead took a B-body, which has a smaller passenger cabin, and did their best to graft the C-body roof onto it. So you ended up with a car that looked more formal and upscale, but was no bigger inside than a Bonneville, Catalina, or Impala/Caprice.
 
IMO, the car didn't really accomplish anything that the old Bonneville Brougham couldn't have done. In fact, once the Grand Ville name was retired, Pontiac brought back the Bonneville Brougham.
 
As for the Chevy Caprice, IMO the 1970's models really weren't any more luxurious inside than the 1960's models, so I guess Chevy's division execs got the short end of the stick! That mandate may have been the reason that the 1971 Chevies had sort of a Cadillac-ish looking front end, though.
 
I don't think you could get leather in a Grand Ville or Bonneville Brougham back in those days, and I'm positive that the Caprice didn't offer it, so that was another area where the Chevy/Pontiac execs would've been screwed by that mandate.
 
Eventually, I think the downsized Bonneville offered leather, or maybe it was the 1983-86 Parisienne. I don't think you could get leather in a Caprice until around 1987.
 
Market saturation of various features is something else, I guess, that dilutes the meaning of a luxury car as time goes by. For instance, once upon a time, air conditioning was a luxury item. So were power windows and leather. These days though, it's almost impossible to find a new car without a/c and power windows. And leather is available in just about everything but the cheapest cars.
#123 of 411
Re: Why, of Course...(lemko) [andre1969] (Mr_Shiftright) [hpmctorque] [Mr_S [andre1969] by circlew
Jan 07, 2009 (11:22 am)
Reply

Replying to: andre1969 (Jan 07, 2009 10:31 am)

Perhaps that's why GM went into the tank...the Top Floor guys forgot to test their cars and drove Mercedes instead!
 
Regards,
OW
#124 of 411
Re: Why, of Course...(lemko) [andre1969] (Mr_Shiftright) [hpmctorque] by euphonium
Jan 07, 2009 (11:29 am)
Reply

Replying to: hpmctorque (Jan 07, 2009 2:40 am)

"Buick once had a "Super", but there was nothing "SPECIAL' about it.
 
The first qualification of a luxury car is that it be an uncommon and rare motor car. A car you don't frequently see in the shopping mall parking lot. A car sold only in the cities large enough to support an NFL or MLB team. As of yet, such is not manufactured in the USA, the Orient, or Norway.
#125 of 411
Re: Why, of Course...(lemko) [andre1969] (Mr_Shiftright) [hpmctorque] [euphonium] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Jan 07, 2009 (11:52 am)
Reply

Replying to: euphonium (Jan 07, 2009 11:29 am)

Well Obama is getting a Cadillac limo...a hideously *ugly* Cadillac limo, but it's probably pretty luxurious inside.
 
Is armor plate considered "luxurious"?
 
And Detroit supports an NFL team.....if you can call it that.
 
Poor Detroit....poor, poor Detroit...
 
median home price San Francisco $500,000
 
median home price Detroit: $80,000
#126 of 411
GMPatriot by gmpatriot
Jan 07, 2009 (4:15 pm)
Reply
Why do people getoff badmouthing anything American? We have a bunch of people who love to tell you how they are patriots ,but they're the same ones driving up our competitors economy and handing your brother his pink slip. The bailout we truely need is for Americans to support their own jobs. The mentality of today vs. post WW2 is 180 degrees out. People learned to adjust habits and purchases that show support beyond their big mouths. Checkout the showrooms as they are beating the comp in almost every category except sales.
#127 of 411
Re: GMPatriot [gmpatriot] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Jan 07, 2009 (4:36 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gmpatriot (Jan 07, 2009 4:15 pm)

This aspect of the American auto industry is really a different topic.
 
 We in the "Classics" Forum are trying, in this particular forum topic, to focus on the problems and pitfalls of buying older, used luxury cars.
 
You might want to scan the list of topics in "Automotive News" forum, many of which deal with the very issues you are bringing up. I pulled it up for you:
 
List Containing Topics on the State of the American Automotive Industry
 
thanks!
 
MrShiftright
Host

Messages Page 13 of 42
1
...
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
...
42
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement