You are here: Forums SUVs Suzuki SX4 Suzuki SX4 Crossover

Suzuki SX4 Crossover

138 messages,  Last post on Dec 02, 2009 at 1:07 PM

You are in the Suzuki SX4 Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Suzuki SX4, Hatchback, Wagon, SUV

Messages Page 7 of 15 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 15 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

#56 of 138 Gas Pedal Comfort and SX4 Options by lpkay Jun 02, 2008 (1:42 pm)
Make no mistake I bought this car because: AWD, high-driving position, cuteness, price. In general I like it very much, however.....   Is anyone having problems with the gas pedal position? I recently purchased a 2007 JLX (Canada) and it feels like the gas pedal is too close to the seat, not something I picked up during the test drive. I'm 5' 8". If I move the seat back the steering wheel is too far away. Without a height adjust for the seat will I need to get a cusion to support my thigh? Does anyone have suggestions?   Pet peeves: Model name differences between countries.   Option/accessory differences between countries. Available elsewhere: driver seat height adjustment, clear hood and light protectors, reverse parking sensor, tow bar, tow bar mounted bike holder, tailored sunshade set for rear/rear-side windows, hands free or bluetooth cellphone kit, ipod dock, a big center armrest. Would you believe that in Canada there is no remote start option available?   Why is not only the car but the accessories so much more expensive in Canada vs USA? Sun Shade = $83? As if. Replies to this message: gregg_vw (Jun 03, 2008 5:26 am)
#57 of 138 Re: Gas Pedal Comfort and SX4 Options [lpkay] by gregg_vw Jun 03, 2008 (5:26 am)
Replying to: lpkay (Jun 02, 2008 1:42 pm) I'm 5'7" and have no problem. However, I have gotten used to driving in an arms extended position. Safer. Too many people drive in a position too close to the airbag.
#58 of 138 Head restraint comfort. FYI by lpkay Jun 09, 2008 (7:09 pm)
I was researching a problem one of my friends was having with an uncomfortable active head restraint. Some people are ok with it, others can't stand it.   NHTSA knows about the complaints lodged under many makes and models such as "VERY POOR-DOESN'T ALLOW ME TO SIT TALL W/GOOD SPINAL POSTURE-HITS BACK OF HEAD WHEN I TRY TO SIT TALL. IT'S NOT ADJUSTABLE, I REMOVED AND REINSERTED IT FACING 180 DEGS FROM ITS INTENDED POSITION."   We found this cushion and it works for her.   link title   Replies to this message: mikus (Jun 15, 2008 10:02 am)
#59 of 138 Re: Head restraint comfort. FYI [lpkay] by mikus Jun 15, 2008 (10:02 am)
Replying to: lpkay (Jun 09, 2008 7:09 pm) Do you know the difference between head restraint and headrest? Head restraints are there to protect your head in case of an accident, not for resting your head on it.
#60 of 138 Crossover on Sand by ajg33 Aug 20, 2008 (6:27 pm)
Has anyone taken their Crossover on sand? I'm wondering if the AWD is strong enough to handle driving on sand dunes...thanks.
#61 of 138 Real Crossover MPG by wads1 Nov 09, 2008 (1:28 pm)
HI, I am thinking of getting a 2009 SX4 Crossover with MT, I have heard that it is a great car. I am a bit concern about the MPG, I have heard that it does not get the rating that is on the sticker, and that it can be as low as 22mpg, I hope to be doing a lot of road trips in this car, so MPG is important to me. I do mostly mixed city/highway, I am also looking at the Fit. Also I would love to hear any other thoughts on the 2009. I am new to this forum and look forward to hearing from you all. Thanks Replies to this message: satguy84 (Nov 09, 2008 1:42 pm) squirtee (Nov 09, 2008 8:14 pm) gregg_vw (Nov 10, 2008 6:02 am) highmiler650 (Dec 03, 2008 7:44 am) gregg_vw (Dec 03, 2008 9:15 am)
#62 of 138 Re: Real Crossover MPG [wads1] by satguy84 Nov 09, 2008 (1:42 pm)
Replying to: wads1 (Nov 09, 2008 1:28 pm) I've had my 2008 SX4 since march of this year. I run service calls (TV) and average about 26.5 MPG in a 50/50 average of city/highway driving. I consider the mileage average, but with all the extras you get on this car PLUS AWD and stability control (I have the Touring package and manual transmission) you can't beat this car. Others have described the acceleration as "lackluster", but with the safety features (beams in the doors) and the AWD and the weight they add, I think it does just fine. It's just as good as my 91 corolla 1.6 liter was. Again, I don't think you can beat this car for the money. Plus, you'll get the built in Navi, something I missed by about 4 months.
#63 of 138 Re: Real Crossover MPG [wads1] by squirtee Nov 09, 2008 (8:14 pm)
Replying to: wads1 (Nov 09, 2008 1:28 pm) Just yesterday I took a rare short trip (156 miles round) in my 2008 SX4 crossover, and since I just phoned in my statistics-haha- to my husband, he figures 33-34mpg. These were all interstate miles and I used the cruise control ALOT (set at 70mph). I mainly use my great little car for back & forth to work (only 2 miles each way), so needless to say it doesn't have many miles on it. I purchased this car exactly a year ago on Halloween and never have regretted it. I didn't get to use the AWD last winter here in Western PA, but one of my co-workers did frequently and never had any problems out on snow covered country roads.. ( I convinced her to buy a SX4 a few months after I bought mine) FYI- she also gets 32-33mpg highway too. I'd go for the suzuki- you can't beat the warranty either! Hope that helps you!
#64 of 138 Re: Real Crossover MPG [wads1] by gregg_vw Nov 10, 2008 (6:02 am)
Replying to: wads1 (Nov 09, 2008 1:28 pm) My 2008 Crossover AWD Touring 2 MT consistently does better than the 2008 (low) EPA estimates. Look at the 2007 estimates for a better picture. Overall, I have averaged 29-30 mpg figuring from day one, and the mileage has improved a bit with a few thousand miles under its belt. The 2008/9 MT is geared better for highway mileage than the 2007 was, but in the real world, the MT does better than the 4 speed automatic, despite what the EPA says. You cannot find better mpg on an AWD vehicle. If you don't want or need AWD, then you may want to look at something else. Replies to this message: highmiler650 (Dec 03, 2008 7:44 am) gregg_vw (Dec 03, 2008 9:15 am)
#65 of 138 Re: Real Crossover MPG [gregg_vw] by highmiler650 Dec 03, 2008 (7:44 am)
Replying to: gregg_vw (Nov 10, 2008 6:02 am) With a 2009 with AT and AWD, I have averaged 33.6 MPG this week on my daily commute of 80 miles, 50% city and 50% highway. Considering the low temps I think this mpg is outstanding! Replies to this message: gregg_vw (Dec 03, 2008 9:15 am)

Messages Page 7 of 15 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 15 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

You are here: Forums SUVs Suzuki SX4 Suzuki SX4 Crossover