- #129 of 135
-
Re: AWD "needed" [tidester]
by highmiler650
-
Oct 30, 2009 (9:00 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: tidester (Oct 28, 2009 9:26 pm)
I have done that. I was interested in this particular owners experience.
|
- #130 of 135
-
Re: AWD "needed" [highmiler650]
by nssx4driver
-
Oct 30, 2009 (12:30 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: highmiler650 (Oct 30, 2009 9:00 am)
My experience is much the same as others. I drive it fairly hard but get 20 city - 30hwy most of the time. On a long trip from Ottawa ON to NS I got 32-33. Lot of flat country through Ontario and Quebec on the TransCanada.
|
- #131 of 135
-
Re: AWD "needed" [highmiler650]
by djs069
-
Nov 09, 2009 (11:05 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: highmiler650 (Oct 28, 2009 1:54 pm)
24-29 mpg
2008 AWD
|
- #132 of 135
-
Re: AWD "needed" [djs069]
by highmiler650
-
Nov 09, 2009 (2:50 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: djs069 (Nov 09, 2009 11:05 am)
Thank you. Considering the 4wd capability this is not bad at all.
|
- #133 of 135
-
Re: AWD "needed" [highmiler650]
by gregg_vw
-
Nov 09, 2009 (5:58 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: highmiler650 (Nov 09, 2009 2:50 pm)
And I regularly get 29-31 with my 2008 AWD crossover. But it is mostly highway miles.
|
- #134 of 135
-
miles and miles
by steve_ HOST
-
Nov 17, 2009 (9:34 pm)
-
|
Some complain about the range but few complain about the view - that goes on for miles.
2009 Suzuki SX4: I Can See for Miles and Miles (Inside Line)
|
- #135 of 135
-
Re: miles and miles [steve_]
by perry99
-
Nov 18, 2009 (7:44 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: steve_ (Nov 17, 2009 9:34 pm)
So true! It is a great looking car. And speaking of the "view," that's one of the huge advantages of the SX4 Crossover: the visibility. So many cars these days have low rooflines in the back with thick C pillars (the rear ones) so it can be hard to see well behind you. But the SX4 has relatively thin C pillars a big wide windows, even in the back, so visibility is excellent 360 degrees. A definitive plus when it comes to driving safety.
|