Sign In Join 



Suzuki SX4 Crossover

138 messages,  Last post on Dec 02, 2009 at 1:07 PM

You are in the Suzuki SX4 Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Suzuki SX4, Hatchback, Wagon, SUV


Messages Page 12 of 14
1
...
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#108 of 138
AWD "needed" by arkainzeye
Aug 10, 2009 (5:26 am)
Reply
ive been seriously thinking about getting a sx4 crossover. im just waiting on the right deal. well i see a man at my local gym that has a 2007 sx4. i asked him all about it. he said he Loved it. i asked him how is the all wheel drive he said.. I NEVER USE IT.. that made me think about things a little different. the main selling point of the Sx4 is the all wheel drive. i live in South West PA. i have a 2004 chevy tracker zr2 and i only used my 4x4 1 time last year and it was to go off roading. so if the sx4 didnt have all wheel drive would you still own one? Btw my tracker is rear wheel drive until put into 4x4 and i never had a problem on the roads since i got it in 2006. Im wondering if i will be paying for something i wont really use? I wondering if there is other cars out there with same features Minus the awd that will get better MPG ?
 
also get this. i will not mention the forum as it is in BAD taste to do that. you can do a search yourself and find this. but i was reading on a all sx4 forum where the 100k warranty is powertrain only and eveything else is 36k miles or 36 months. there were a group of sx4 owners that had their AC units fail on them at around 40k miles and suzuki did not cover them. there was also ALOT of air bag issues and rear axle leaks. suzuki covered them two. but alot of people had to wait for parts. im not bashing.. i love suzuki. my tracker is made by them. im just stating a few facts and i am embarrassed i didnt look into the warranty more. i didnt know it is only a 36k bumper to bumper warranty. i think others like kia is 60K. ? i would like to hear others thoughts on this.. btw the ac units that failed were $2000 to replace
#109 of 138
Re: AWD "needed" [arkainzeye] by perry99
Aug 10, 2009 (6:53 am)
Reply

Replying to: arkainzeye (Aug 10, 2009 5:26 am)

First, in regard to the warranty, you don't need to go by some nameless forum. Suzuki is very clear that the 100k is only for powertrain, Suzuki Warranty info and that the bumper to bumper is 36k/36 month. The main benefit is that, unlike many companies, the powertrain warranty is fully transferable.
 
As for the AWD, I've had my SX4 Crossover for over 2 years. I've certainly engaged the AWD when it's been very rainy and once or twice in the snow. I haven't used it in very rough conditions, but the car has certainly handled excellently in heavy rain on slick roads, and on snow-covered roads.
 
I believe that they now offer the SX4 Crossover in a non-AWD version.
#110 of 138
Re: AWD "needed" [perry99] by arkainzeye
Aug 10, 2009 (7:11 am)
Reply

Replying to: perry99 (Aug 10, 2009 6:53 am)

if they offer it in a non awd i might look into it. as i have a 4x4 and havent NEEDED to engage it since i bought it. Unless going off road. and as i said before it is rear wheel drive. my main point about the warranty was the Air conditioning units that failed on that forum and since it was past 36,000 miles Suzuki said NOPE not covering it. as they shouldnt. It just makes me rethink a few things. cause to be 100% honest i have had 2 suzuki and BOTH had ac issues. one failed and one right Now is starting to cool less and less, and it was just recharged. My sisters aerio did the samething! i thought that would have been resolved in the sx4 but from the forum i was on with people with higher mileage 40K plus now its ugly head it starting to poke back out... When i first heard about this problem and i had my tracker (suzuki) i thought this wont happen to me cause i take care of my cars. then one year goes by then two. NOTHING. but on yr 3 AC FAILED. they wanted close to $2000 to repair it, i opted to Not have it repaired.. i wonder if suzuki sales a warranty that you can UP the 36k to something alot better.
#111 of 138
Re: AWD "needed" [arkainzeye] by jbrew7
Aug 10, 2009 (9:27 am)
Reply

Replying to: arkainzeye (Aug 10, 2009 5:26 am)

I live in the Sierra Nevada mountains and my SX4 handles the snow with ease. It's amazing what this car can do with large amounts of snow. I haven't had any mechanical problems (knock, knock). My only issue is it looks like I need brand new tires after 22k miles.
#112 of 138
Re: AWD "needed" [arkainzeye] by gregg_vw
Aug 10, 2009 (9:28 am)
Reply

Replying to: arkainzeye (Aug 10, 2009 7:11 am)

Wait for the 2010 FWD Crossover. It is a bit lower (no roof rack), a bit more hp, better mileage, nice amenities. The Crossover and Sport handle like go-karts, though the ride is a bit rough.
#113 of 138
Re: AWD "needed" [gregg_vw] by arkainzeye
Aug 10, 2009 (10:05 am)
Reply

Replying to: gregg_vw (Aug 10, 2009 9:28 am)

i think the FWD is a great choice for MOST people. like i said i have 4x4 and NEVER USE IT... i took a kia soul for a test ride today. im not sure how i feel about it. but it did come with a power moon roof sirius radio INSTALLED and active for 3 months free. bluetooth , IPOD connection Included! cup holders all over the place, 18 inch wheels,ton of rear legs room in the back. it was $17900 NO awd though... i liked the 60000 mile Bumper to Bumper warranty! i played with the power moon roof that was GREAT! one button. but like i said NO awd.. so.....
#114 of 138
Re: AWD "needed" [arkainzeye] by gregg_vw
Aug 11, 2009 (4:39 am)
Reply

Replying to: arkainzeye (Aug 10, 2009 10:05 am)

The new Kia Forte blows the FWD Suzuki Forte away.
#115 of 138
Re: AWD "needed" [gregg_vw] by arkainzeye
Aug 11, 2009 (12:58 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gregg_vw (Aug 11, 2009 4:39 am)

im going to a kia/suzuki dealer tonight. they sell Both! imagine that.. lol im going to really compare warranties. features etc. basically most bang for the buck.
#116 of 138
Re: AWD "needed" [arkainzeye] by gregg_vw
Aug 11, 2009 (3:00 pm)
Reply

Replying to: arkainzeye (Aug 11, 2009 12:58 pm)

I'm betting on the Forte, and I love my Suzuki!
#117 of 138
Re: AWD "needed" [arkainzeye] by stinson108
Sep 06, 2009 (8:10 pm)
Reply

Replying to: arkainzeye (Aug 11, 2009 12:58 pm)

Trying to respond to a few things in the recent posts: Following is based on limited time with my 2009 SX-4 AWD manual shift Crossover, Tech version......
 
The navigation device (a very nice unit made by Garmin) lives in a flip up compartment on top of the dash. It is easily removed to safeguard it. My dealer suggested leaving the empty mount in the open position so that a thief can see it is not installed in the car and hopefully will not break in. The unit, by the way, has built in batteries, and when you take it out it remembers the location where you took it out of the car. You can use the unit (in pedestrian mode) to get back to your car if you leave it in a big parking lot or on a side street in a big city. Neat feature.
 
The fuel milage is a little low for a small car, but is WONDERFUL for an all wheel drive car. There is no point comparing this car's milage to various Mazda 3, Mini, Ford Focus type cars. They are a different class of vehicle. Compare this car to the Toyota Matrix, Ford Escape, Pontiac Vibe type of cars. The SX-4 shines in that crowd.
 
Do you really need/want AWD? That is a question you need to answer before you decide what class of cars to shop in, and what group of cars to compare fuel milage, quality and quantily of options, etc among. As far as the question of do you really NEED AWD, I live in northern New Hampshire, which is serious snow and hill country. I drove a Jeep in the winter until I got the SX-4 and only used the Jeep's four wheel drive because of snow maybe ten to fifteen times in five years. But baby, when I needed it, I needed it badly. So, if you live in snow country, the question is do you want to be ready for those very few times when the AWD will save your bacon, or are you willing to be stranded at those times? Life is full of choices. I choose to carry the extra driveline components around and pay the slight fuel milage penalty to be ready for those few times each winter when the AWD will save my bacon.
 
By the way, and this is important, DO NOT let the ability of an all wheel drive vehicle to go in the snow make you cocky. It can go better than regular cars, but it cannot stop or steer better than other cars in slippery conditions. After a snow storm up here, almost all the cars in the ditch or upsidedown in the median are various all wheel drive vehicles. People get waaaayyy to confident because they can go so well, and go faster than conditions warrant. You still need to steer and stop, and AWD does you no good in that area. Be careful.
 
My car has been trouble free, but is is only a couple of months and four thousand mile old. Time will tell...........

Messages Page 12 of 14
1
...
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement