- #106 of 138
-
Re: SX4 reliability record [arkainzeye]
by gregg_vw
-
Aug 08, 2009 (12:04 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: arkainzeye (Aug 07, 2009 5:17 pm)
It is real (summer) overall mileage, calculated by the tank. However, I do drive to get good mpg. I rarely go over 70 mpg, I brake less than most people and take corners a bit faster than most (not as much acceleration to do once through it), and I emphasize that this is mileage in warm weather. Bad weather and cold weather cut into it and 22 mpg city is about all I get too. I don't think that is bad though. Our cities are poorly designed for traffic and people still resist traffic circles, despite that there is no sitting at lights (which saves gas), not to mention that they are safer.
|
- #107 of 138
-
Re: SX4 reliability record [gregg_vw]
by arkainzeye
-
Aug 09, 2009 (1:35 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: gregg_vw (Aug 08, 2009 12:04 pm)
more than likely the use of more fuel in the winter is caused by how much more dense the air is in the winter so the fuel injecton has to match the dense air with More fuel therefor causing you to use more fuel for the same type of driving. one plus is, you should have more pick up and go.
|
- #108 of 138
-
AWD "needed"
by arkainzeye
-
Aug 10, 2009 (5:26 am)
-
|
ive been seriously thinking about getting a sx4 crossover. im just waiting on the right deal. well i see a man at my local gym that has a 2007 sx4. i asked him all about it. he said he Loved it. i asked him how is the all wheel drive he said.. I NEVER USE IT.. that made me think about things a little different. the main selling point of the Sx4 is the all wheel drive. i live in South West PA. i have a 2004 chevy tracker zr2 and i only used my 4x4 1 time last year and it was to go off roading. so if the sx4 didnt have all wheel drive would you still own one? Btw my tracker is rear wheel drive until put into 4x4 and i never had a problem on the roads since i got it in 2006. Im wondering if i will be paying for something i wont really use? I wondering if there is other cars out there with same features Minus the awd that will get better MPG ?
also get this. i will not mention the forum as it is in BAD taste to do that. you can do a search yourself and find this. but i was reading on a all sx4 forum where the 100k warranty is powertrain only and eveything else is 36k miles or 36 months. there were a group of sx4 owners that had their AC units fail on them at around 40k miles and suzuki did not cover them. there was also ALOT of air bag issues and rear axle leaks. suzuki covered them two. but alot of people had to wait for parts. im not bashing.. i love suzuki. my tracker is made by them. im just stating a few facts and i am embarrassed i didnt look into the warranty more. i didnt know it is only a 36k bumper to bumper warranty. i think others like kia is 60K. ? i would like to hear others thoughts on this.. btw the ac units that failed were $2000 to replace
|
- #109 of 138
-
Re: AWD "needed" [arkainzeye]
by perry99
-
Aug 10, 2009 (6:53 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: arkainzeye (Aug 10, 2009 5:26 am)
First, in regard to the warranty, you don't need to go by some nameless forum. Suzuki is very clear that the 100k is only for powertrain, Suzuki Warranty info and that the bumper to bumper is 36k/36 month. The main benefit is that, unlike many companies, the powertrain warranty is fully transferable.
As for the AWD, I've had my SX4 Crossover for over 2 years. I've certainly engaged the AWD when it's been very rainy and once or twice in the snow. I haven't used it in very rough conditions, but the car has certainly handled excellently in heavy rain on slick roads, and on snow-covered roads.
I believe that they now offer the SX4 Crossover in a non-AWD version.
|
- #110 of 138
-
Re: AWD "needed" [perry99]
by arkainzeye
-
Aug 10, 2009 (7:11 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: perry99 (Aug 10, 2009 6:53 am)
if they offer it in a non awd i might look into it. as i have a 4x4 and havent NEEDED to engage it since i bought it. Unless going off road. and as i said before it is rear wheel drive. my main point about the warranty was the Air conditioning units that failed on that forum and since it was past 36,000 miles Suzuki said NOPE not covering it. as they shouldnt. It just makes me rethink a few things. cause to be 100% honest i have had 2 suzuki and BOTH had ac issues. one failed and one right Now is starting to cool less and less, and it was just recharged. My sisters aerio did the samething! i thought that would have been resolved in the sx4 but from the forum i was on with people with higher mileage 40K plus now its ugly head it starting to poke back out... When i first heard about this problem and i had my tracker (suzuki) i thought this wont happen to me cause i take care of my cars. then one year goes by then two. NOTHING. but on yr 3 AC FAILED. they wanted close to $2000 to repair it, i opted to Not have it repaired.. i wonder if suzuki sales a warranty that you can UP the 36k to something alot better.
|
- #111 of 138
-
Re: AWD "needed" [arkainzeye]
by jbrew7
-
Aug 10, 2009 (9:27 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: arkainzeye (Aug 10, 2009 5:26 am)
I live in the Sierra Nevada mountains and my SX4 handles the snow with ease. It's amazing what this car can do with large amounts of snow. I haven't had any mechanical problems (knock, knock). My only issue is it looks like I need brand new tires after 22k miles.
|
- #112 of 138
-
Re: AWD "needed" [arkainzeye]
by gregg_vw
-
Aug 10, 2009 (9:28 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: arkainzeye (Aug 10, 2009 7:11 am)
Wait for the 2010 FWD Crossover. It is a bit lower (no roof rack), a bit more hp, better mileage, nice amenities. The Crossover and Sport handle like go-karts, though the ride is a bit rough.
|
- #113 of 138
-
Re: AWD "needed" [gregg_vw]
by arkainzeye
-
Aug 10, 2009 (10:05 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: gregg_vw (Aug 10, 2009 9:28 am)
i think the FWD is a great choice for MOST people. like i said i have 4x4 and NEVER USE IT... i took a kia soul for a test ride today. im not sure how i feel about it. but it did come with a power moon roof sirius radio INSTALLED and active for 3 months free. bluetooth , IPOD connection Included! cup holders all over the place, 18 inch wheels,ton of rear legs room in the back. it was $17900 NO awd though... i liked the 60000 mile Bumper to Bumper warranty! i played with the power moon roof that was GREAT! one button. but like i said NO awd.. so.....
|
- #114 of 138
-
Re: AWD "needed" [arkainzeye]
by gregg_vw
-
Aug 11, 2009 (4:39 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: arkainzeye (Aug 10, 2009 10:05 am)
The new Kia Forte blows the FWD Suzuki Forte away.
|
- #115 of 138
-
Re: AWD "needed" [gregg_vw]
by arkainzeye
-
Aug 11, 2009 (12:58 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: gregg_vw (Aug 11, 2009 4:39 am)
im going to a kia/suzuki dealer tonight. they sell Both! imagine that.. lol im going to really compare warranties. features etc. basically most bang for the buck.
|
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
SUVs 
