Sign In Join 



Saturn Aura vs. Honda Accord

326 messages,  Last post on Dec 19, 2007 at 5:48 AM

You are in the Saturn Aura Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Saturn Aura, Honda Accord, Car Comparisons, Sedan


Messages Page 1 of 33
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
33
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#2 of 326
Aura vs. Accord by drwilsc
Sep 12, 2007 (5:11 pm)
Reply
I passed by the local honda dealer today after hours and spotted two 2008 Accords (the newly redesigned ones). I was able to sit in one of them as it was unlocked. It was a stripped down model that stickered at $22,100 and had a 4-cyl. and cloth. I was underwhelmed. The dashboard layout was not as nice as the Aura's and the entire car did not feel as 'substantial'. The other one stickered around $28,700 (well above a decked-out XR, especially with the rebates) and still had just a 4-banger, but did have leather and a navigation system.
Although obviously I did not drive the Accord, I came away from the experience glad I went with the Aura. It just seems like more car for less money.
#3 of 326
Re: Aura vs. Accord [drwilsc] by 1487
Sep 13, 2007 (4:54 am)
Reply

Replying to: drwilsc (Sep 12, 2007 5:11 pm)

most cars in this class are relatively equal. The Accord gives you better V6 mileage (19/29 vs 17/26) but is more costly and not nearly as attractive. Basically the Accord EX-L without nav is equipped closely to an Aura XR with leather, sunroof and XM radio. The Accord is over $28K at that price while the Aura is at $27k or so before rebates. Of course that $28k Accord has gooseneck hinges, no manumatic, no Onstar, no split folding seat, 17" wheels, smaller trunk, and no remote start.
#4 of 326
Re: Aura vs. Accord [1487] by mitchflorida
Sep 22, 2007 (4:58 am)
Reply

Replying to: 1487 (Sep 13, 2007 4:54 am)

I test drove a Saturn Aura XR yesterday. Can't say I was very impressed. Not a smooth engine or ride like the Accord. Also the Interior seemed cheaper and leather was vinyl like.
 
I don't think that the the Aura is in the same league as the Accord, sorry.
#5 of 326
Re: Aura vs. Accord [mitchflorida] by phaetondriver
Sep 22, 2007 (8:44 am)
Reply

Replying to: mitchflorida (Sep 22, 2007 4:58 am)

U'r right about one thing, the Saturn XR is not in the same league as the Accord. More comparable to the Acura TL I think.
You must have driven an XE and thought it was an XR. The DOHC 3.6 in my XR is as smooth as any Acura or BMW V6 out there.
What I love is passing tractor trailer trucks on a two lane. It pulls from 60 to 100 by the time I have cleared the cab (about 7 seconds). Can your Accord do that? I think not.
 
Sorry you didn't have as great a test drive as I did. Once I drove it and saw the price I had to take it home. I have over 12000 miles on it now and love it even more than ever. Saturns aren't for everyone, and I am sure you are/will be happy with you accord.
#6 of 326
Re: Aura vs. Accord [phaetondriver] by shipo
Sep 22, 2007 (7:38 pm)
Reply

Replying to: phaetondriver (Sep 22, 2007 8:44 am)

"You must have driven an XE and thought it was an XR. The DOHC 3.6 in my XR is as smooth as any Acura or BMW V6 out there."
 
I'll grant you that, the Aura's V6s (yes both of them) are WAAAAAY smoother than any BMW V6 ever built. Then again, BMW has never built a V6 so I guess the point is moot.
 
As for comparing any V6 (from Acura, Saturn or anybody else for that matter) to a BMW I6 for smoothness, don't be silly; no V6 in history is as smooth as even a coarse I6. Why? Well, V6s by the nature of the beast are inherently unbalanced, regardless of the degree of the vee. Yes, balance shafts and isolation damping engine mounts can help, but they're still shakers at heart. Engines built in the I6 configuration are naturally in perfect balanced for all rotational and vibrational forces.
 
Best Regards,
Shipo
#7 of 326
Re: Aura vs. Accord [shipo] by 1487
Sep 24, 2007 (6:59 am)
Reply

Replying to: shipo (Sep 22, 2007 7:38 pm)

The point is the Aura's V6 stacks up well against any comparable DOHC v6s. It may even be more refined than the Nissan VQ which is often criticized for being more coarse than its Honda and Toyota counterparts.
#8 of 326
Re: Aura vs. Accord [mitchflorida] by 1487
Sep 24, 2007 (7:02 am)
Reply

Replying to: mitchflorida (Sep 22, 2007 4:58 am)

"I don't think that the the Aura is in the same league as the Accord, sorry."
 
I dont think anyone comparing the cars in an objective manner could make such a claim, sorry. The Aura's ride and handling are definitely in the same league as the Accord as noted by many test drive reviews and owners who have driven both cars. If you werent impressed I would say its likely because it was a Saturn and you were leaning towards the Honda anyway.
#9 of 326
Aura vs Accord by drwilsc
Sep 22, 2007 (10:30 am)
Reply
Some of it is simply a matter of personal taste. Both are great cars. I chose the 07 Aura XR partly because of the $2500 rebate I received. A similarly equipped Accord would have been considerably more money. You know the dealers aren't going to budge on such a new model. For the record, my wife has a 2003 Honda Odyssey that (knock on wood) has given us no problems and is a very nice vehicle.
#10 of 326
Leather by drwilsc
Sep 22, 2007 (3:24 pm)
Reply
The comment about the Aura's 'vinyl-like' leather sparked my interest. So I went to the Honda dealer today and sat in a 2008 Accord with leather. To be honest, it was only marginally better than Saturn's. You wouldn't mistake either them for the rich, soft leather in, say, a Mercedes.

Messages Page 1 of 33
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
33
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement