Sign In Join 



Will the Chevy Volt Succeed?

544 messages,  Last post on Oct 28, 2009 at 1:11 PM

You are in the Chevrolet Volt Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Chevrolet Volt, Automotive News, Hybrid Cars, Coupe, Hatchback, Truck, Sedan, SUV


Messages Page 47 of 56
1
...
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
...
56
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#452 of 544
Re: A little high? [dmathews3] by stephen987
Feb 15, 2009 (9:03 pm)
Reply

Replying to: dmathews3 (Feb 15, 2009 12:03 pm)

Also whoever is spreading the word of the Volt being built in England is I think way wrong.
 
I think the plan is to build them in the US for American buyers, and in England for European buyers. Make sense now?
#453 of 544
Re: A little high? [stephen987] by dmathews3
Feb 16, 2009 (5:11 am)
Reply

Replying to: stephen987 (Feb 15, 2009 9:03 pm)

yes it does.
#454 of 544
by ingvar
Feb 16, 2009 (8:06 am)
Reply
For 40K+ I better get 135d European Delivery
#455 of 544
Utility rates will kill volt without solar on roof. by option7
Mar 05, 2009 (11:14 pm)
Reply
The base rate in Southern California is 12 cents per KWH up to 10KWH average dailey use. If you use the Volt every day and add 8KWH per day to charge it for a max of 40 miles you will push up your home power useage into tier 3 at 21 cents/KWH, tier 4 at 25 cents or tier 5 at 27 cents. These rates are expected to rise 20% in 2009. This means you will pay at least $2 to $2.40 for every 40 miles in a perfect world. The Volt will need to do better than this to get my buy in. This makes a Honda or Toyota Hybrid much more attractive but still not worth it. The only way to make the numbers work is if the roof has photovoltaic cells on it to charge the batteries off grid. Electric car charging demand will force up utility rates to match closely the value of gas as it rises. Even swap from being held hostage by oil companies to being held up by power utilities......unless you generate DC to charge yourself !
#456 of 544
Re: Utility rates will kill volt without solar on roof. [option7] by dmathews3
Mar 06, 2009 (7:20 am)
Reply

Replying to: option7 (Mar 05, 2009 11:14 pm)

I was all for a Volt until I found out it is 2" shorter than a Cobalt. For the 20K difference I can buy a heck of a lot of fuel. Besides it looks like GM is on its way out. As a GM retired I'm not looking forward to that as it will take my health care and before it is over some of my pension. There are millions of us retired people in this fix and at my union hall none of the retired will ever buy GM again if we lose out. I for one will never buy American in anything again, not even a foreign car built here. And this is from someone who buys American all I can, my tennis shoes, to clothes are all american but no more. No one else in this country cares so why should I?
#457 of 544
IT WON"T SUCCEED AT $40k by 9394
Mar 09, 2009 (12:14 pm)
Reply
Who would pay $40k for a small car that looks like a Civic.
 
I don't have a degree in marketing, but it makes much more sense to me that GM should aim for lower profit / higher volume so that more cars can be produced to keep the workers employed.
#458 of 544
Re: IT WON"T SUCCEED AT $40k [9394] by stephen987
Mar 09, 2009 (1:04 pm)
Reply

Replying to: 9394 (Mar 09, 2009 12:14 pm)

I don't have a degree in marketing, but it makes much more sense to me that GM should aim for lower profit / higher volume so that more cars can be produced to keep the workers employed.
 
GM isn't in business to keep the workers employed, though. Right now the only thing keeping GM in business is the hope of a multi-year federal bailout. Politically speaking, they have to be able to demonstrate the capability for innovation. The Volt shows that capability much more effectively than, say, the Malibu or Cobalt, no matter how excellent (or how profitable) those cars may be.
#459 of 544
Volt battery testing by larsb
Jun 10, 2009 (8:46 am)
Reply
This one is for those who doubt (ahem, Gary) that GM or Toyota can put a safe, well-tested Li Ion battery on the road, read this:
 
link title

As the company completes work on the battery for the first-generation Volt, it's also developing batteries for the second and third generation of the vehicle, which involves evaluating different battery materials and cells to find ones that store more energy, making it possible to use fewer of them.
 
The lab has two main sections: one for evaluating battery cells from various suppliers, and one for evaluating the performance of battery packs--cells packaged with electronics and systems for cooling and heating the cells to keep them at an optimal temperature range. The battery packs contain a type of lithium-ion cell that can be degraded by extreme temperatures.
 
Inside the lab, the packs are charged and discharged while being subjected to high and low temperatures as well as extremes of humidity. Engineers can also simulate different altitudes by placing the packs in barometric chambers. So the engineers can simulate conditions along a humid, hot coastline at sea level, or atop an arid and cold mountain. They can also mimic road conditions with a machine that shakes the battery packs. Elevated temperatures, which speed up the aging process of battery materials, are being used to confirm a ten-year lifetime for the batteries with about two years' worth of tests. In addition to being tested in the battery lab, the packs are being subjected to tests in actual vehicles both on the road and in a climate-controlled wind tunnel. So far, more than 100 battery packs have been built for testing.
#460 of 544
Re: Volt battery testing [larsb] by corvette
Jun 13, 2009 (8:00 am)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Jun 10, 2009 8:46 am)

I will say this: It used to be that lithium ion laptop and cell phone batteries would degrade significantly within about 18 months after they were manufactured. Newer models seem to have a longer lifespan. My father has a 30 month old notebook that still holds 90% of its rated charge. Apple introduced a new notebook last week and claimed a five-year lifespan on the battery.
#461 of 544
Should GM take note? by pf_flyer HOST
Jul 14, 2009 (4:21 pm)
Reply
While it's not surprising that the lights in the Volt group have basically been switched off while GM reinvents itself (could resist the pun ), I think it illustrates that the Volt, or any other EV with limited range and a high price tag for that matter, is NOT the answer for what ails the North American auto market.
 
The Volt seems to be an answer to a question that nobody is asking.

Messages Page 47 of 56
1
...
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
...
56
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement