Sign In Join 



Will the Chevy Volt Succeed?

545 messages,  Last post on Dec 02, 2009 at 12:57 PM

You are in the Chevrolet Volt Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Chevrolet Volt, Automotive News, Hybrid Cars, Coupe, Hatchback, Truck, Sedan, SUV


Messages Page 44 of 55
1
...
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
...
55
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#425 of 545
Re: Not at $40K it won't [irismg] by eaton53
Oct 18, 2008 (8:28 am)
Reply

Replying to: irismg (Oct 11, 2008 7:06 am)

"Stylistically, I love the looks, but would prefer a wagon or hatchback for added utility."
 
The Volt is a hatchback.
 
"From the non-enthusiast perspective, there's no way I'd buy any car of any brand at $40K. I'm someone who wants to spend as little as possible on my transportation, and a person shouldn't have to pay through the nose for several years just to save the Earth. The Earth belongs to low and middle-income people, too"
 
Congress has passed a $7500 tax credit on the Volt, it's a done deal. You may pay $40K up front but then you will get a big chunk of it back.
 
I expect early adopter types and well-to-do greenies will quickly snap up the available Volts and those who want cheap will just have to wait until the price comes down, like they did with plasma TVs and Blu-Ray players.
 
"Chevrolet is traditionally the poor man's (and woman's) car in that we get reasonable quality at a reasonable price."
 
For a number of years Chevrolet was the #1 "true luxury" brand... true luxury being defined as a vehicle with an MSRP over $40K. People don't have an aversion to paying $40K for a Chevrolet as long as it's a good one.
#426 of 545
Re: Not at $40K it won't [eaton53] by stephen987
Oct 20, 2008 (6:35 am)
Reply

Replying to: eaton53 (Oct 18, 2008 8:28 am)

For a number of years Chevrolet was the #1 "true luxury" brand... true luxury being defined as a vehicle with an MSRP over $40K.
 
Huh? When?
#427 of 545
plug-in mini cooper by tpe
Oct 20, 2008 (9:03 am)
Reply
mini ev
 
What I find most interesting here is that there really hasn't been much news about BMW's EV program yet they seem like they'll be the first to have a sizeable test fleet here in the US. You listen to talk from GM and Toyota and they both seem to state that significant engineering hurdles are still left to be cleared before even 40 mile electric range can be offered.
 
The Volt isn't going to be a money maker for GM for quite some time, if ever. IMO they would have been far better off getting it on the road as soon as possible through a very limited number of leases like what BMW plans to do. Or what GM is doing with it's fuel cell Equinox. From a PR perspective it would have been valuable and you'd minimize your liability, After a couple years GM would have gathered a lot of real world data allowing them to work out the initial bugs and have a better sense of the battery pack's longevity before going into full production.
#428 of 545
Re: plug-in mini cooper [tpe] by reddroverr
Oct 25, 2008 (12:42 pm)
Reply

Replying to: tpe (Oct 20, 2008 9:03 am)

Tough one, tpe. GM lost 15.5 billion last quarter. They need a home run. They are banking that they can pull it off. Maybe it is swinging riverboat gambling. Senor Obama and the mighty ORP syndicate will probably subsidize the hell out of this car. I think a fuel cell at this point is pie in the sky several years to come and no small part of that being the fueling infrastructure. So, it is a different animal and standard production would be insanity. However, a partial batter car seems fully doable...if more complicated than many think. I don't know if they think the battery will realistically come down in price with improvements and larger production runs...I would hope so or it is quite possibly a foolish move. Despite what is happening now, unless it is the end of world, I still think we will see much higher oil prices in a couple years.
#429 of 545
Re: plug-in mini cooper [reddroverr] by reddroverr
Oct 27, 2008 (11:08 am)
Reply

Replying to: reddroverr (Oct 25, 2008 12:42 pm)

I just read that GM is cutting the first year production waaaaaay back. Just bring the g*dd*mn high mileage diesels over here. PLEASE!
#430 of 545
Reality by pf_flyer HOST
Nov 05, 2008 (6:10 am)
Reply
GM has to deal with the realities of the market. Can't base your production on thinking the market hasn't changed.
 
I think that's the kind of thing that got GM to this point in the first place
#431 of 545
Re: Reality [pf_flyer] by reddroverr
Nov 06, 2008 (12:55 pm)
Reply

Replying to: pf_flyer (Nov 05, 2008 6:10 am)

Lutz:
 
A: It’s clear the thing is going to cost many thousand dollars more than we had hoped for the first generation technology. So what do we do about that?
 
Initially there will be enough demand from rich people, so there won’t be a worry for the first year or two. But if we want to generalize the technology the price has to come down.
 
I agree
 
Q: Assuming the Volt delivers on expectations and is well-received by consumers, what else could derail GM’s efforts?
 
A: Let us say that over the next 18 months the world goes into a major recession, car sales and fuel use drop dramatically, the steel companies produce less steel and therefore use less energy, China finds its main export markets drying up, so they are into a contraction and use less steel and aluminum and plastic. And at the same time Canadian tars sands come on stream, and coal-to-liquids come on stream. All of a sudden there is a reduction in primary demand in petroleum plus all these additional new supply sources, which were started at the time of $140 a barrel, suddenly coming on stream. And oil drops to $25 a barrel and we’re looking at gas pump prices at $1.25 a gallon. I personally don’t think that’s going to happen, but that would be a dramatic event for the Volt because everybody would say, 'Ha! Why
should I bother?’
 
I agree
 
If I recall they were talking about 6k cars in 2010. I guess that makes sense and the production continues into 2011 where they hopefully meet the 50k or whatever the initial targets were.
 
http://www.thestar.com/comment/columnists/article/501213
#433 of 545
Do they got TO the Volt intact? by pf_flyer HOST
Nov 12, 2008 (5:22 pm)
Reply
When the Volt was announced, 2010 didn't look all that far away as far as getting things done in time to have the car ready. Now it's looking like a long time only because of what GM seems like it's going to have to get through just to make it to that 2010 date for release.
#434 of 545
Buzz? by pf_flyer HOST
Nov 20, 2008 (12:05 pm)
Reply
HispanicBusiness.com had a chance to check out the production version of the Volt at the Los Angeles Auto Show. While we weren't allowed to actually take a seat in it, we can't deny the "wow" factor in the outward design of the car.
http://www.hispanicbusiness.com/news/newsbyid.asp?idx=135644&cat1=auto&cat2=cutt- ingedge
 
Color me skeptical, but what the Volt looks like isn't nearly as important as how it performs.

Messages Page 44 of 55
1
...
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
...
55
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement