Sign In Join 



Will the Chevy Volt Succeed?

544 messages,  Last post on Oct 28, 2009 at 1:11 PM

You are in the Chevrolet Volt Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Chevrolet Volt, Automotive News, Hybrid Cars, Coupe, Hatchback, Truck, Sedan, SUV


Messages Page 2 of 55
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
55
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#5 of 544
Cooling not really a breakthrough by pf_flyer HOST
Sep 16, 2007 (3:42 am)
Reply
The batteries were overheating, they needed to be cooled. That's treating a symptom, not curing the disease.
 
It's possible that there isn't going to be much of a "cure" I suppose. A breakthrough would be finding a way to transfer energy to and from the battery without generating any heat (or significantly less heat), something like that.
 
I also agree the $30,000 price tag is too high. And if the goal of the Volt is to generate traffic in GM showrooms because they need that right now, then they're doing it for the wrong reason.
#6 of 544
Re: Cooling not really a breakthrough [pf_flyer] by gagrice
Sep 16, 2007 (5:33 am)
Reply

Replying to: pf_flyer (Sep 16, 2007 3:42 am)

Many people paid $30k plus for the Prius II when it was in short supply. So I think they can get the money from those that have more than they need. I agree that cooling the batteries with water is just another complex system added to an overly complex vehicle. KISS is still my motto. I think it is all part of the push by industry to generate throwaway products. Hybrids are a big step in that direction. Most electronics are throwaway now. GM in hindsight sees the success that Toyota has with hybrids and want to try and capture some of that fake green color.
#7 of 544
Will it succeed?...................... by daysailer
Sep 17, 2007 (8:55 am)
Reply
It is much too early to predict, since it is just a concept under development that won't be available until (at least)2010. The available info suggests that it at least is close to the ballpark, if not in it. $30K does seem a bit of a reach for a vehicle as described, but it's not otherworldly. I applaud GM for one of their rare forays into innovation, however, given their history, I wouldn't buy one 'til their reliability was proven.
#8 of 544
I certainly HOPE it succeeds by larsb
Sep 17, 2007 (9:13 am)
Reply
Here's one vote hoping the Volt is a smashing success, with hundreds of buyers on waiting lists at every GM dealer in the country.
 
(Not for the sake of GM, but for the sake of the environment.)
#9 of 544
Re: Cooling not really a breakthrough [pf_flyer] by tpe
Sep 17, 2007 (5:50 pm)
Reply

Replying to: pf_flyer (Sep 16, 2007 3:42 am)

The batteries were overheating, they needed to be cooled. That's treating a symptom, not curing the disease.
 
ICE's would overheat if it wasn't for radiators, fans, and oil. Do you consider that to be treating a symptom? It would be nice if batteries generated less heat because this represents wasted energy, which is why ICE's are so inherently inefficient.
 
I agree that $30k is a little steep. However if the driver can expect to save $1k/year in gasoline he might start seeing it as comparable to a $25k vehicle. If states and/or the feds offer $3k tax credits, which is likely, then it really is getting into the affordable range.
#10 of 544
It's too early to tell by nedzel
Sep 24, 2007 (9:21 am)
Reply
I sure hope that the Volt succeeds. The big question mark is the battery pack: how much will it cost, how long will it last, and what range will it provide in Minnesota during the winter, with the defroster running and the battery pack cold-soaked?
#11 of 544
Way Too Early by 1stpik
Nov 21, 2007 (11:09 am)
Reply
Since the words "General Motors" and "success" don't seem to go together anymore, I have to make this point: the Volt can only "succeed" if the GM actually MAKES the car. Right now, it's all hype.
 
Telling everyone in 2007 that you'll build a revolutionary car by 2010 means nothing. The Big Three have been playing this game since the 1950s. We're all hip to the scam now.
 
The Volt project only makes me wonder how advanced electric propulsion technology would ALREADY be if GM had not scrapped the EV-1 project a decade ago. The people who "killed the electric car" are now telling us they're going to build an even better one ..... in a few years.
 
Yeah, right.
 
I'll believe it when I see it.
 
#12 of 544
Alternate Route on the Volt by pf_flyer HOST
Nov 21, 2007 (11:29 am)
Reply
Charging Up
 
Still a big hurdle or two if Chevy is going to get the Volt to market by 2010
#13 of 544
Re: Way Too Early [1stpik] by tpe
Nov 21, 2007 (5:05 pm)
Reply

Replying to: 1stpik (Nov 21, 2007 11:09 am)

You can't compare GM's efforts regarding the Chevy Volt to their EV1. In the case of the EV1 they were mandated by CARB to produce this vehicle and they did so, kicking and screaming. The Chevy Volt is internally motivated and GM has promoted it to the extent that to not deliver would represent a major "black eye". I believe we will see the Chevy Volt. Whether or not GM meets their 2010 timeline will be dependent on battery technology, not their resolve. I believe that GM has seen the light and they realize the EV is the future. I think they also realize this is a chance to leapfrog Toyota and they aren't going to pass it by. I wish them success.
#14 of 544
Re: Way Too Early [tpe] by gagrice
Nov 21, 2007 (6:30 pm)
Reply

Replying to: tpe (Nov 21, 2007 5:05 pm)

I agree with that analysis. I do not know how CARB and the state of CA get off the hook on screwing up the EV-1 project. Must be the Hollywood crowd that want to make GM look bad and CA look good. I am cheering for GM and the Volt also.

Messages Page 2 of 55
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
55
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement