Sign In Join 



Will the Chevy Volt Succeed?

545 messages,  Last post on Dec 02, 2009 at 12:57 PM

You are in the Chevrolet Volt Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Chevrolet Volt, Automotive News, Hybrid Cars, Coupe, Hatchback, Truck, Sedan, SUV


Messages Page 38 of 55
1
...
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
...
55
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#370 of 545
Re: please dont drive on highway 40 miles [peralta] by eaton53
Sep 25, 2008 (3:09 am)
Reply

Replying to: peralta (Sep 24, 2008 7:26 pm)

"I would guess that driving the volt with the ICE and with empty battery would be a terrible waste of fuel especially on the highway. Much worse than a regular car."
 
They're saying 50mpg. If it hits that number it will be much better than a regular car.
 
There is also talk of using On-Star so your Volt will always know how far it is away from home and attempt to to optimize its operation.
 
I have a 19.2 mile each way commute... a nearly ideal Volt distance. I'm sure the engine would run occasionally, which is not necessarily a bad thing. It keeps things lubed and the gas fresh. Volts should have a program that runs them occasionally for that reason, even if you never exceed battery range.
 
I'd think people considering Volts would ask themselves how often they would go over 40 miles without having charge access. For something like 80% of the population the answer would be "not often".
#371 of 545
Re: please dont drive on highway 40 miles [peralta] by tpe
Sep 25, 2008 (4:50 am)
Reply

Replying to: peralta (Sep 24, 2008 9:58 pm)

The ICE would even be more efficient with almost 100% transmission efficiency if there is a clutch for direct mechanical drive, ideal for indefinite highway driving.
 
That would be the most efficient way to use the ICE but I think it would add complexity, weight and cost. The ICE is not going to be powerful enough to be the sole source of propulsion in some driving conditions, eg accelerating, going up a grade. So you'd need the capability of being able to supplement the ICE with the electric motor. I think your previous suggestion where the ICE generator directly powers the electric motor and uses it's occasional surplus to keep the batteries at 30% SOC has a lot of merit and it doesn't sound like a monumental engineering feat to accomplish this. Who knows, maybe the Volt will be doing this to some extent. In addition to it's greater efficiency it would reduce charge cycles on the battery pack. However you'd still want to only operate the ICE in a narrow power range that represented it's peak efficiency.
#372 of 545
Re: please dont drive on highway 40 miles [tpe] by peralta
Sep 25, 2008 (7:29 am)
Reply

Replying to: tpe (Sep 25, 2008 4:50 am)

"That would be the most efficient way to use the ICE but I think it would add complexity, weight and cost"
 
Not necessarily. Things quickly becomes complicated if it is multispeed transmiision but not in a single speed gear reduction system. Single speed gear reduction system is almost always used by electric motors to power the wheels (except for in-wheel motors). That same gear reduction can be shared with the ICE.
 
"However you still want to only operate the ICE in a narrow power range that represented it's peak efficiency. "
 
A 1.4 L turbo gas engine will probably make efficient horsepower from maybe 15 hp to 70 hp. Below 15 hp requirement as in stop and go, that is taken cared by the battery power and the engine is off (like the prius).
 
Steady highway speed needs 15-30 hp. Assuming it has one fixed mechanical gear (as in top gear of a regular transmission), the electric motor will shoulder the extra boost needed for acceleration.
 
In that case. say you want to drive all day long. The distance all day would probably 600 miles (60mph average over 10 hours).
 
40 miles of that distance will be handled by battery and 560 miles will be petrol. The battery part will take care of the stop and go situations and also on the occasional additional boosts on the highway.
#373 of 545
Re: please dont drive on highway 40 miles [peralta] by eaton53
Sep 25, 2008 (8:31 am)
Reply

Replying to: peralta (Sep 25, 2008 7:29 am)

I'm pretty sure it's the way it is because future Volts won't have an engine if fuel cells become viable.
#374 of 545
Re: please dont drive on highway 40 miles [eaton53] by tpe
Sep 25, 2008 (8:34 am)
Reply

Replying to: eaton53 (Sep 25, 2008 8:31 am)

That's a good point. But the fuel cell could still send some of it's electricity directly to the motor and bypass the battery.
#375 of 545
Re: please dont drive on highway 40 miles [peralta] by tpe
Sep 25, 2008 (8:45 am)
Reply

Replying to: peralta (Sep 25, 2008 7:29 am)

In the configuration you are describing the Volt would actually have more available power after the first 40 miles because now it could tap into the electric motor and the ICE for propulsion. Unless you are suggesting that the car also be able to access the ICE during the first 40 miles. The whole point of this car is to burn zero gasoline for most trips so I don't see that happening. Plus this car would correctly be called a hybrid at this point, which would probably disqualify it from some of the tax credits now being considered.
#376 of 545
Re: please dont drive on highway 40 miles [tpe] by eaton53
Sep 25, 2008 (11:12 am)
Reply

Replying to: tpe (Sep 25, 2008 8:34 am)

I'd think most of the power will go to the motors and some to the battery to maintain a minimum charge. At that point the battery should be there to smooth out the highs and lows and capture free braking energy. If an engine is the power source since you really want to run it in a narrow, very efficient range.... hopefully one where the use of HCCI becomes possible.
#377 of 545
Re: please dont drive on highway 40 miles [eaton53] by tpe
Sep 25, 2008 (11:40 am)
Reply

Replying to: eaton53 (Sep 25, 2008 11:12 am)

I think you are right. Until recently I was under the impression that all the power generated by the ICE went straight to the battery pack, which would have been horribly inefficient. On the other Volt thread I was directed to a link which confirms what you're saying. For some reason it seems that there are Volt enthusiasts who feel somehow duped by the fact that the ICE will only maintain a charge rather than recharging the battery pack. I can't understand why anyone would object to that.
 
With that said I don't quite understand the significance of OnStar or using GPS for calculating the distance to your destination/home. If once the battery pack is depleted to 30% it is maintained there what does it matter how far you are from home?
#378 of 545
Re: please dont drive on highway 40 miles [tpe] by eaton53
Sep 25, 2008 (1:54 pm)
Reply

Replying to: tpe (Sep 25, 2008 11:40 am)

Apparently if the battery has reached its charging threshold and OnStar determines you are within a predetermined distance of your home and proceeding in that direction it will be able to delay kicking the engine on until you get there. Every little bit helps, I guess.
 
"I can't understand why anyone would object to that."
 
Only if they're irrational. I know I would not want to arrive home ready to plug in only to find out my car was fully charged. I want to use cheap electricity, not expensive gasoline!
#379 of 545
Re: please dont drive on highway 40 miles [tpe] by peralta
Sep 25, 2008 (2:19 pm)
Reply

Replying to: tpe (Sep 25, 2008 11:40 am)

"With that said I don't quite understand the significance of OnStar or using GPS for calculating the distance to your destination/home. If once the battery pack is depleted to 30% it is maintained there what does it matter how far you are from home? "
 
If you travel 40 miles or less everyday, then you don't even need the ICE. You might as well add maybe 50-100 lbs of reserve battery and delete the ICE altogether.
 
The ICE is a range extender, nothing more, but it is somehow expensive and still pollutes the air.
 
The goal is to use grid electricity to charge the battery where it is cheaper rather than the ICE. If you travel say 200 miles, then it is best to use 1) battery power where it is most efficient and also 2) ICE where it is most efficient.
 
1) Battery is most efficient (financially) when it gets it's charge from the grid and not from ICE. It is also best for stop and go application portion of the long distance travel. It is also efficient on steady speed but it has limited range.
 
2) The ICE is most efficient if it powers the electric motors exclusively, and bypassing the batteries. It is also best if the car is already in motion and not stationary.
 
With those presumptions, it is best that the battery will be depleted just in time when you arrive home for grid recharge.
 
Going back to the subject of deleting the ICE. How much would it cost if you remove the ICE and in it's place, put additional 100 lbs of reserve battery (or shall we say range extender battery?)?
 
Will it be cheaper and make more sense to go pure EV?
 
By the way, the 1999 model Toyota electric RAV4 had a range of 120-130 miles per charge and it did not even used lthium batteries. It used EV95 NiM hydride batteries where the patent rights was then purchased by TEXACO. TEXACO subsquently denied production of more EV95 batteries and threatened the companies with electric vehicles on the road.
 
No wonder, the car companies were scared and crushed their EV's despite public protest from leasee, owners and treehuggers.
 
Speaking of EV RAV4, there are still some of them running and escaped the crushing. Some have more tha 150,000 miles on the odometer without battery problems.

Messages Page 38 of 55
1
...
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
...
55
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement