Sign In Join 



Will the Chevy Volt Succeed?

544 messages,  Last post on Oct 28, 2009 at 1:11 PM

You are in the Chevrolet Volt Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Chevrolet Volt, Automotive News, Hybrid Cars, Coupe, Hatchback, Truck, Sedan, SUV


Messages Page 33 of 56
1
...
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
...
56
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#313 of 544
Re: Wake up [hoyahenry] by gagrice
Sep 18, 2008 (10:20 am)
Reply

Replying to: hoyahenry (Sep 18, 2008 4:36 am)

At $600/month incl insurance (and maint I think), the FCX is a win! Not in CA, I can't get one
 
You have to be a Hollywood star to get one. Or at least some kind of mogul. That is just a figure they get to eliminate the riff raff. The car still costs $100,000+ to build and an H station would probably not be feasible or given a permit for in CA at least. It is all a publicity move by Honda. GM has the same kind of thing going with their hydrogen SUV.
#314 of 544
Re: Wake up [gagrice] by larsb
Sep 18, 2008 (10:37 am)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Sep 18, 2008 10:20 am)

Gary says, "You have to be a Hollywood star to get one. Or at least some kind of mogul."
 
Typical generalization. Incorrect again. They did not lease all 200 of them to celebs or to moguls.
 
The first vehicles were delivered to select customers including Jamie Lee Curtis and her filmmaker husband Christopher Guest. Curtis and Guest have owned other alternative fuel and hybrid vehicles, and they continue to seek out ways to live and advocate a greener lifestyle.
 
Demand was greater than supply for these new vehicles so Honda developed criteria for fuel cell ownership, included proximity to hydrogen refueling stations, driving patterns and vehicle needs. Plans call for Honda to deliver 200 FCX Clarity vehicles to customers in the U.S. and Japan in the first three years of production and leases were initiated in July. About 200 go to consumers in the next three years. Most will be leased for $600 a month to average customers in Southern California who have other cars and live near one of three 24-hour public hydrogen stations.

 
More:
 
Honda Fuel Cell Vehicle Firsts
 
The original FCX became the first EPA- and CARB-certified fuel cell vehicle to also meet all safety standards in July 2002. The FCX was also the world's first production fuel cell vehicle, introduced to the U.S. and Japan in October 2002. Additional highlights include:
 
* The FCX was the first fuel cell vehicle to start and operate in sub-freezing temperatures (2003).
* The FCX was the first fuel cell vehicle placed in the hands of an individual customer, the Spallino family of Southern California (July 2005).
* The world's youngest fuel cell customer, 17-year-old actress Q'orianka Kilcher leased an FCX in March 2007, making her the first person ever whose first car was powered by hydrogen.
* Honda becomes the first auto manufacturer to manufacture a dedicated fuel cell vehicle on a production line solely dedicated to the production of hydrogen-powered fuel cell vehicles (2008)
* Honda becomes the first manufacturer to create a fuel cell vehicle dealer network

 
And:
 
The three-year leases cost $600 a month, which includes maintenance and collision coverage. The car has a range of about 270 miles per tank. Honda said it received 50,000 applications.
 
"You're not sacrificing anything, and actually for me it's an enhanced driving experience," said Jon Spallino, a Redondo Beach, Calif., businessman who previously drove an older version of the FCX and will lease the Clarity. "I think that's a misconception people have, that you're puttering around in an underpowered cramped little soapbox."

 
Sure, Honda used a little "star power" in their program. They want exposure and they want to be in the news. It's called MARKETING and EVERY COMPANY NEEDS IT.
#315 of 544
Re: Wake up [larsb] by tpe
Sep 18, 2008 (12:00 pm)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Sep 18, 2008 10:37 am)

According to GM if/when fuel cells become viable it will be a relatively simple modification to pull the ICE out of the Volt and replace it with a fuel cell stack. I'm not sure why Honda sees no value in pursuing this intermediate approach while simultaneously refining their fuel cell technology. Maybe their position will eventually take the same 180 degree turn that Toyota's took. Until about a year ago Toyota was adamentally opposed to the idea of a plug-in Prius. Now they are racing with GM to bring it to the market before the Volt.
#316 of 544
Re: There is a REASON that the Volt will not be here until 2010 [larsb] by coldcranker
Sep 18, 2008 (2:16 pm)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Sep 18, 2008 6:45 am)

larsb said: "And to produce 16 kwh on the fly?"
 
I think you mean kilowatts, a power measure, not kilowatt-hours, an energy measure. Energy is the accumulation or usage of power over time.
 
Your point about what the gas engine/generator would do when the batteries were way down on charge is a good one. I think Chevy may have a way to leak some amps over to the electric drive motor directly without going through the batteries first. This is needed because the point is to charge the batteries, and there is a heat loss if you route all amps through the batteries. My expertise is really mechanical/aerospace/software engineering, so maybe some electrical engineers or techs out there can set me straight if it is possible or advisable for some of the gas engine electricity to go directly to the electric motors under some circumstances. Like I said, this should prevent the kind of high-amp heat losses of going through the batteries during times when the electric motor needs amps that the batteries can't provide.
#317 of 544
Re: Wake up [larsb] by gagrice
Sep 18, 2008 (4:27 pm)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Sep 18, 2008 10:37 am)

Typical generalization. Incorrect again. They did not lease all 200 of them to celebs or to moguls.
 
And how many joe blows got one from the first batch? There is no guarantee they will ever build all 200 handmade cars. I think they have built less than 12 to date.
 
I was only responding to an individual that thought he could go to his local Honda dealer and lease one. It does not work that way.
 
The Volt should be much more of a practical vehicle than the FCX. Though I would expect the lease price to be about the same $600 per month.
#318 of 544
Don't want to burst your bubble... by keepinon
Sep 18, 2008 (4:44 pm)
Reply
I hope the Volt can deliver as advertised. That said, can I remind folks that fossil fuels (coal and oil) provide the energy to produce the electricity needed to recharge the Volt's battery in many areas? In other areas it is nuclear energy (which produces the most toxic substance on the planet as a by-product). So, don't get too enamored with the "green" technology. Just sayin.
#319 of 544
Re: [dave8697] by 2doorpost
Sep 19, 2008 (6:14 am)
Reply

Replying to: dave8697 (Sep 18, 2008 8:52 am)

After buying 20-plus GM cars brand new in the last 34 years, I am sure my efforts have put a little coin in GMs pockets.Never bought foriegn. They still rust around here- besides the draining the economy aspect.
 
The issue boils down to credibilty, along with a long record of misses and not hits.
Who here bought a Chevy Vega? A diesel Olds? A V8-6-4 Caddy?
 
Get the battery pack together - show me a car that I can drive to save real cash and I'll believe.
 
Think credibility- not credit.
#320 of 544
Re: Don't want to burst your bubble... [keepinon] by larsb
Sep 19, 2008 (6:21 am)
Reply

Replying to: keepinon (Sep 18, 2008 4:44 pm)

keepinon says, "That said, can I remind folks that fossil fuels (coal and oil) provide the energy to produce the electricity needed to recharge the Volt's battery in many areas?"
 
Well, you might remind us, but let me add these caveats to your attempted buzz kill:
 
The amount of fossil fuels which are being burned to produce electricity is going DOWN year by year as more renewable energy sources come online. Every year, that PHEV will be using cleaner and cleaner power.
 
And the amount of pollution created by the electricity that an electric vehicle uses is a very small percentage of the pollution directly created by burning fossil fuel in an engine on the vehicle itself. Even using coal, emissions are lower with EVs and moving the pollution away from population centers is a good thing. Utilities have plenty of excess generating capacity at night which could charge millions of plug-in cars. While electricity is getting cleaner and more renewable every year, even the cleanest gasoline car becomes ever more polluting. An electric car, on the other hand, just gets cleaner over time as the grid gets cleaner.
 
And nuclear energy is cleaner than you think. The by-product is being dealt with in responsible ways all over the world. France is the leader and they do not "glow in the dark" as of yet. The technology to store the nuclear waste is improving at a fast rate also, just as are most technologies in the area of energy production.
 
So yes, EVs do reduce pollution, and will continue each year to be even cleaner.
#321 of 544
Re: Don't want to burst your bubble... [keepinon] by tpe
Sep 19, 2008 (7:37 am)
Reply

Replying to: keepinon (Sep 18, 2008 4:44 pm)

Protecting the environment is not the only reason behind the renewed interest in EVs. Becoming energy self sufficient is another major factor. The US has the capability to produce all the electricity it needs to power a fleet of electric vehicles. We cannot now and never will be capable of producing enough oil to power a fleet of ICE vehicles.
#322 of 544
Re: [2doorpost] by coontie66
Sep 19, 2008 (7:51 am)
Reply

Replying to: 2doorpost (Sep 19, 2008 6:14 am)

WELL I am one of those owners of Chevys.. I had a 72 Vega and it was one of just two vehicles that I bought new that I couldn't get to 100,000 miles. I also owned a 80 VW Rabbit ---ugly little sucker.
 
The common thread is Consumer Report! Recommended by CR and I have not read their magazine since.
 
I now have a 06 Chev Silverado diesel... what a wonderful vehicle. Also own a 03 Buick Park Ave.. another wonderful vehicle with great gas mileage. 30-32 on the road...--its too bad GM didn't tell anyone. My OLD 91 Chev 1500 Chev 4 X 4 gets 22 on the road and can haul its weight in mulch and other STUFF.
 
Remember when you buy foreign EVEN if its built in TN or some other state the Profits still went back to Japan. Those profits were not spent on things in the USA but in Toyko or somewhere. I would like to see a Tundra pull up to my 5th wheel camper and pull it up Saluda Mtn on I 26 here in WNC.
 
Even my OLD Chevy gets better gas mileage than my buddy's and we drive them all the way across NC to the Outer Banks each fall and fish ON THE BEACH ... No rust on my OLD Chevy but its showing up on the Toyota already. SUPERIOR TRUCK?????????? I don't think so.

Messages Page 33 of 56
1
...
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
...
56
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement