Sign In Join 



Hyundai Sonata vs Honda Accord - READ ONLY

664 messages,  Last post on Oct 12, 2007 at 3:33 PM

You are in the Hyundai Sonata Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Hyundai Sonata, Honda Accord, Car Comparisons, Sedan


Messages Page 66 of 67
1
...
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#645 of 664
Re: The fact is isellhondas... [kdshapiro] by backy
Oct 12, 2007 (11:21 am)

Replying to: kdshapiro (Oct 12, 2007 10:13 am)

How many of those Accord buyers have driven a Sonata?
#646 of 664
Re: The fact is isellhondas... [backy] by robertsmx
Oct 12, 2007 (11:23 am)

Replying to: backy (Oct 12, 2007 11:21 am)

How many times? How many miles? I drove one for a few days as recently as last week and see NOTHING that makes me want a Sonata over Accord.
#647 of 664
Re: The fact is isellhondas... [backy] by kdshapiro
Oct 12, 2007 (11:26 am)

Replying to: backy (Oct 12, 2007 11:21 am)

On paper the Sonata wins every time. That can't be refuted.
#648 of 664
Re: Quantum Leap [robertsmx] by backy
Oct 12, 2007 (11:29 am)

Replying to: robertsmx (Oct 12, 2007 9:54 am)

Then why does Hyundai cut the warranty in half if the first owner decides to sell?
 
They don't. The second buyer gets the full benefit of the remaining 5-year, 60,000 mile bumper-to-bumper warranty. Which is 2 years and 24,000 miles longer than the Accord's bumper-to-bumper warranty.
 
Say someone sells their three-year old Sonata with 36,000 miles on it. The next owner gets a factory bumper-to-bumper warranty for two years/24,000 miles. If an Accord owner sells his car after 3 years/36,000 miles, all the next owner gets is 2 years and 24,000 miles of powertrain warranty.
 
Question: who got the better warranty: the 2nd Sonata owner, or the 2nd Accord owner?
 
Extended warranties are available on used Sonatas also. So the fact you can buy one on an Accord--or pay more for a used Accord that has an extended warranty automatically applied--is not a big deal.
#649 of 664
Re: and yet [robertsmx] by backy
Oct 12, 2007 (11:36 am)

Replying to: robertsmx (Oct 12, 2007 10:11 am)

ACE (Advanced Compatibility Engineering) is about proper dispersion of forces against larger (higher) and heavier vehicles, that goes beyond simply running into a barrier for IIHS/NHTSA standardized tests. ... There are no standardized tests that account for these, ...
 
The sled used in the IIHS side impact test is designed to mimic the height and weight of a small truck or SUV--one reason it's a tougher test than the NHTSA's test.
 
To a normal person, ACE simply sounds like any other approach to doing better in crash tests.
 
I suppose that may be true... but it was not said by anyone here, except you just now. I do think there is a correlation between what Honda has done with the Accord's structure with ACE and its ability to get good scores on the standardized crash tests. If you disagree, fine. But it's clear that Honda cares very much about getting good crash test scores, so I have no doubt they were thinking about them when they designed the 2008 Accord. And I'm glad they did.
#650 of 664
Re: style and engineering [benjaminh] by backy
Oct 12, 2007 (11:40 am)

Replying to: benjaminh (Oct 12, 2007 10:16 am)

Good analysis, and I agree the Accord's engineering is slightly superior to that of the Sonata overall. But then, I would expect that for a car that debuted three years after the Sonata did. The car companies tend to leapfrog each other. How will Hyundai respond for the mid-gen refresh next spring, and the next generation in 2-3 years?
#651 of 664
Re: Quantum Leap [backy] by robertsmx
Oct 12, 2007 (12:23 pm)

Replying to: backy (Oct 12, 2007 11:29 am)

How could you forget THE warranty that Hyundai runs around with on a huge banner? And that is the 10-year/100K mile warranty. Why exactly does it get chopped in half for the new buyer? And this happens while Hyundai promotes long warranty as a big selling point (but I'm willing to bet, few buyers are aware of this fact). Let us take this to another level.
 
An Accord buyer sells his car after 4 years/50K miles and it goes for sale as a certified used car. The new owner gets 3-years/50K miles powertrain warranty (and 1-year/12K mile on everything else).
 
How about Sonata? Well, 50K miles disqualifies it from being considered as certified, as it has exceeded the maximum allowance of 4-years/48K miles.
 
Why?
#652 of 664
Re: Sales History [robertsmx] by targettuning
Oct 12, 2007 (12:28 pm)

Replying to: robertsmx (Oct 12, 2007 10:04 am)

What I actually said was that the 1971/72 Honda 600 was totally incompatible with the United States climate, driving conditions, and about everything else. It was also totally unloved. The first Civic was introduced in 1973 and did well because of the fuel shortage. Subaru had a small car (the 360) that flopped about the same time. A bigger Subaru was introduced in about 1975. Datsun had a few small cars also so Honda was not alone.
#653 of 664
Re: and yet [backy] by robertsmx
Oct 12, 2007 (12:56 pm)

Replying to: backy (Oct 12, 2007 11:36 am)

You've completely missed the point. Civic from pre-ACE era did just as well as the Civic w/ACE in crash tests. What changed? It is not something that shows up on the window sticker, or IIHS/NHTSA website. Also ACE isn’t about side protection.
 
ACE is about minimizing the impact from size difference between crashing vehicles, as well as incorporating pedestrian protection. It takes a lot more to do that (and something that won’t be reflected in crash tests) than to design a car around a standard sled.
 
Of course Honda would like to see good crash test results too, but that’s not why they came up with ACE. See my example on Civic above. Is there a difference in 5-star with ACE versus 5-stars without?
 
Just to give you an idea, Michelin Challenge Design at NAIAS had 260 entries from 51 countries. The theme was focusing on safety not only for the occupants of vehicles, but everyone who shares the road. From a related article:
 
“We asked participants to design vehicles, incorporating safety features not only for the vehicle occupants, but also for others who share the road. We challenged designers to consider how vehicles interact with vehicles of other sizes and types and to emphasize accident avoidance, occupant protection and pedestrian safety”
 
And that is where ACE comes into play. And in fact, ACE was a winner (Civic’s ACE structure was showcased). You won’t find this as a star ratings on the window sticker. It is more about awareness than a selling point, at least at this time.
 
But, seeing those stars (no pun intended) might not be telling you everything. For example, 2003-2007 Accord’s front side impact rating has 4-stars. While 2005-2007 Sonata has 5-stars. Does that make Sonata safer? Let us look more closely at the details for the front/side test (Accord/Sonata)
Head Injury Criterion: 216/265
Thoracic Trauma Index: 62/55
Pelvis Deceleration: 65/75
 
Interestingly enough, Accord is safer on two of three counts, and relatively close in the third. But the stars that you see (again, no pun intended) doesn’t consider the pelvic and head injury.
 
Welcome to the world of standardized tests, and counting stars.
#654 of 664
Re: Quantum Leap [isellhondas] by kingsalmon
Oct 12, 2007 (1:03 pm)

Replying to: isellhondas (Oct 12, 2007 10:04 am)

Hyundai wasn't forced to do anything. They chose to give out the warranty and it paid off for them. Please don't make it sound like even their successes are due because of someone else forcing them to do anything.
 
Give credit to where it's due. If one person buys a maglight which has a lifetime warranty and he buys a regular flashlight that doesn't have a warranty which one would make him feel more at ease?
 
It's the one with a longer warranty. Regardless of the fact that one's superior to another, it's the perception of the people that Hyundai wanted to challenge.
 
So they challenged it. They laid aside a budget for warranty repairs and they didn't even need to use all of it. They took the risk and perhaps that risk FORCED them to build higher quality cars.
 
People still prefer to buy Honda's over Hyundai. So therefore Hyundai dealers are FORCED to lowering prices below MSRP and selling for way cheaper than Honda's.
 
So who benefits from that? The customer or more specifically the Hyundai customer.
 
Please be fair with your assessments about other car companies. I've owned a new Civic that's been nothing but problems before (and that i was FORCED to sell) so I'm familiar with both Hyundai and Honda products. By the time I needed repairs for the Civic, my warranty barely expired. Bad luck perhaps, but also a bad warranty.
 
You are right, the best warranty is the one you'll never have to use. To bad I had to use it on the Honda but it wasn't available.
 
By the way, I paid $4,000 more on the Honda than the Hyundai Elantra. After repair bills, I made about $3,000 on resale. Bought the Elantra and never had to look back. Still have 30,000 miles left on the warranty and hopefully never will have to use it, but if I do, atleast I have one to use. So give me all the dealership rhetoric you want, I'll take substance over style anyday.
 
Hmm... If I had to do it again, which one would I choose?

Messages Page 66 of 67
1
...
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement