Sign In Join 



2009/2010 Honda Fit

284 messages,  Last post on Oct 30, 2009 at 10:21 AM

You are in the Honda Fit Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Honda Fit, Automotive News, Future Vehicle, Hatchback


Messages Page 29 of 29
1
...
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#278 of 284
Re: press request [devindied] by stephen987
Sep 09, 2009 (3:15 am)
Reply

Replying to: devindied (Sep 08, 2009 7:01 pm)

That's not a bad deal. Fits are in pretty short supply.
#279 of 284
18,000 for a SUBCOMPACT!!!!! by georgiemabel
Sep 13, 2009 (9:26 pm)
Reply
People, I'm sorry, but honda's are overhyped and WAY overpriced. -Yes, the fit is roomy and yes it get's good gas mileage and is reasonably zippy - but that's where it ends. I have'nt felt that much cheap HARD plastic on an interior since i rented a chevy aveo 3 YRS AGO! and that ride- ouch! every bump is an event - i live in Spokane, WA - we've got plenty of potholes. The best car i've owned? the 2000 ford focus zx3 hatchback we traded in on the fit - 126,000 miles and NO problems- that car had way more soft touch materials on the interior (which isn't hard as the fit has none) - and the ride struck the right balance between sport and comfort - oh yeah, it was $12,000 brand new- we bought into the honda hype and have been regretting it since 2006- furthermore, i never hear anyone complain about the turning circle! the circle in our focus was MUCH tighter than the fit (which turns as tight as a minivan). This will probably be our last honda.
#280 of 284
Re: 18,000 for a SUBCOMPACT!!!!! [georgiemabel] by bamacar
Sep 14, 2009 (3:36 am)
Reply

Replying to: georgiemabel (Sep 13, 2009 9:26 pm)

Guess if the 17.1 foot turning radius of your Fit reminds you of a MiniVan then your ZX3 17.9 turning radius must have felt like a Full Size Van. Even the larger 2nd generation Fit has just a 17.2 foot radius. Maybe you need to get yours looked at.
 
Both the Fit and Focus are/have been good vehicles in two different classes. Take a look at the Ford Fiesta which is coming out shortly and will be a direct competitor to the Fit if you are a Ford fan. Only problem is you will have less cargo space and versatility with the Fiesta.
#281 of 284
Re: 18,000 for a SUBCOMPACT!!!!! [georgiemabel] by chas0215
Sep 15, 2009 (1:38 am)
Reply

Replying to: georgiemabel (Sep 13, 2009 9:26 pm)

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion because everyone's needs are different. The FIT is not a perfect car but in my opinion its plusses far outweigh its few minuses. It may be somewhat overpriced (as are most Hondas, Toyotas, and the like) but it is certainly not overhyped. Its interior versatility alone makes it as functional as the SUV I gave up for it and its fuel economy is just outstanding. Slight differences in the turning radius are not prime issues for me or for most drivers. The FIT is a winner for me! I have a feeling that it is for most people who have purchased it as well.
#282 of 284
Purchased an 09 Fit last week by aaykay
Sep 27, 2009 (8:02 pm)
Reply
I had an 08 Fit that I drove for over 17,000 trouble-free miles and traded it in, for a 7-seater (the trade-in price was just $3000 off what I paid for it brand-new and does not include the $800 savings in sales-tax !). As soon as I drove off the lot, I sorely regretted letting go of the Fit (base with a manual trans).
 
I went back last week and bought an 09 Fit Sport with a manual Trans (could not sleep well without a fuel-sipping swiss-knife-like Fit in the garage ). The car seems to drive with a bit more of a quality feel than my prior 08 Fit. Seems more "substantial", if I were to put it differently. I am still on the first tank of dealer-filled fuel, and hence I will probably wait till it is re-filled (with my customary Shell or BP gas) before starting to check the mileage.
 
PS: In case of the Honda Fit, the EPA mileage is just plain BS, based on personal experience. I never got less than 35MPG in combined city/hwy driving, in my 08 Base Fit with a manual transmission and routinely got in the 37mpg range and much higher during other times, depending on the way I drove and the route I drove. I also never use any of the "hypermiling" techniques that I read about either and routinely drive at 70-80mph (and well above those speeds too ) on the hwy. The engine obviously felt a bit buzzy at such higher speeds but I have always felt Honda engines to be fully upto the task of high rpm cruising. At those times I always wished for a 6th gear in the Fit, to be quite honest.
 
PS2: However, since it is a manual transmission, I always coast downhill or on level ground, with clutch pressed in (like with all of my manual transmission cars) which probably dramatically allows the raising of the mileage (something that the EPA probably does not factor into its MPG rating in their manual transmissioned cars).
#283 of 284
Changes in 2010 Honda Fit? by rgf42
Oct 30, 2009 (10:13 am)
Reply
Are there any improvements for the 2010 year? Like 4 wheel disk brakes and a larger fuel tank.
#284 of 284
Re: Changes in 2010 Honda Fit? [rgf42] by stephen987
Oct 30, 2009 (10:21 am)
Reply

Replying to: rgf42 (Oct 30, 2009 10:13 am)

None whatsoever, and one real loss--you can no longer get nav with the manual transmission.

Messages Page 29 of 29
1
...
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement