Sign In Join 



Article Comments - 2008 Honda Accord First Drive, Full Test and Long Term Test

309 messages,  Last post on May 02, 2009 at 8:03 PM

You are in the Honda Accord Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Honda Accord, Coupe, Sedan

First Drive: 2008 Honda Accord Sedan - The '08 Accord strikes a familiar balance of performance, value and efficiency. But this time it's not bland. (more)
 
First Drive: 2008 Honda Accord Coupe - An oddly sexy Honda Accord with the heart of, well, a Honda Accord. (more)
 
Full Test: 2008 Honda Accord EX V6 - At the test track, the new Accord hit 60 mph in 7.1 seconds and ran the quarter-mile in 15.5 seconds at 91.8 mph. That's a solid improvement over the Accord in our last V6 Family Sedan Comparison Test, but it's still well behind the Camry V6 that whomped to 60 in just 6.5 seconds and scorched the quarter in 14.6 seconds at 97.3 mph. (more)
 
Long-Term Test: 2008 Honda Accord EX-L V6 - With every new generation of a vehicle as popular as this, questions are raised, even more so in a segment as fiercely competitive as the family sedan market. Has Honda gone too far in an effort to spice up its volume offering, aspired to too much sophistication? (more)


Messages Page 30 of 32
1
...
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#287 of 309
Re: Long-term Test [baggs32] by bodble2
Dec 01, 2008 (5:57 pm)
Reply

Replying to: baggs32 (Nov 29, 2008 6:16 pm)

Those 0-60 times are comparable to those posted by the '98-2002 Accord V6 rated at 200hp under the old standard, so not much progress in 10 years.
#288 of 309
Re: Long-term Test [bodble2] by thegraduate
Dec 01, 2008 (6:08 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bodble2 (Dec 01, 2008 5:57 pm)

About the 1999 Accord EX V6 Coupe, here at Edmunds:
 
With 200 horsepower and 195 foot-pounds of torque on tap, the V6-equipped coupe gets to 60 mph in 7.5 seconds.
 
Its fuel economy is 18/26, and the Accord of that era weighed about 400 lbs less than today's model.
 
Today's fuel economy is 19/29, and has more safety equipment, room, and accelerates to 60 MPH 0.5 sec faster according to Edmunds (although most other magazines show a ~1 sec difference - 7.6sec for the old 200hp Sedan, approx 6.5sec for the new 271hp model).
 
I'd call that substantial improvement.
#289 of 309
Re: Long-term Test [thegraduate] by bodble2
Dec 02, 2008 (3:42 am)
Reply

Replying to: thegraduate (Dec 01, 2008 6:08 pm)

"Acceleration to 60 mph from a standstill required 7 seconds (with 1 foot of rollout like on a drag strip) when new, but grew to 7.8 seconds by the Accord's final test..."
#290 of 309
Re: Long-term Test [bodble2] by thegraduate
Dec 02, 2008 (7:25 am)
Reply

Replying to: bodble2 (Dec 02, 2008 3:42 am)

Sounds like a flaw/anomaly with that Accord.
#291 of 309
by DDynamics
Dec 02, 2008 (8:43 am)
Reply
7 sec. is kind of disappointing from a 268HP V6 when the CVT Altima 4 banger hits 60 in 7.4 (C&D test). However, I'm sure it's more than adequate in any normal driving situation.
#292 of 309
Re: [DDynamics] by thegraduate
Dec 02, 2008 (9:43 am)
Reply

Replying to: DDynamics (Dec 02, 2008 8:43 am)

Please compare apples to apples when comparing though!
 
Edmunds has notoriously lower acceleration times when comparing to C&D and Motor Trend. Those same magazines tested the V6 Accord at 6.5sec.
 
To note the difference, Edmunds showed the I4 Accord running in the low 9s (9.3 I think?), while Car and Driver had it running at 8.2sec to 60.
 
They apparently use different track surfaces/launch techniques than the magazines do. I can see how it'd look bad, but one really has to compare results within the same source to see how vehicles compare, because methods differ from publication to publication.
#293 of 309
Re: [thegraduate] by bodble2
Dec 02, 2008 (12:35 pm)
Reply

Replying to: thegraduate (Dec 02, 2008 9:43 am)

C & D will launch using brake-torquing. Not sure if Edmunds would do that.
#294 of 309
Re: [bodble2] by th83
Dec 02, 2008 (1:06 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bodble2 (Dec 02, 2008 12:35 pm)

Edmunds launches their cars just as aggressively as the other guys do. In fact, they often mention their launch methods on the results page of a road test, and their methods usually include brake-torquing and clutch-abusing techniques.
#295 of 309
Re: [th83] by bodble2
Dec 02, 2008 (5:06 pm)
Reply

Replying to: th83 (Dec 02, 2008 1:06 pm)

Then it's strange that there would be such big discrepancies in acceleration times.
#296 of 309
Re: [bodble2] by thegraduate
Dec 02, 2008 (8:22 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bodble2 (Dec 02, 2008 5:06 pm)

Something is definitely different. Maybe the combination of a surface less conducive for quick launches combined with the fact that perhaps the magazines allow the "1-foot rollout" while Edmunds does not.
 
Whatever the reasoning, Edmunds' times come out consistently slower, nearly EVERY time.

Messages Page 30 of 32
1
...
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement