Article Comments- 2007 Lincoln MKZ Full Test

26 messages, Last post on Aug 22, 2007 at 10:40 AM

You are in the Lincoln Zephyr/MKZ Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Lincoln MKZ, Sedan

Article comments for Full Test: 2007 Lincoln MKZ - While the 2007 Lincoln MKZ is comfortable and drives well, its lower standard of overall refinement keeps it a step behind the luxury leaders. (more)

Outline

Messages Page 4 of 4: 1; 2; 3; 4; Prev; Next; Last

#23 of 26 Re: No suprise here [savetheland] by cowbell Aug 21, 2007 (7:41 am)
Replying to: savetheland (Aug 20, 2007 4:36 pm) I can't help but ask, having never driven an MKZ, how do you know that the details are not as good in the Lexus? How can you tell this from pictures? Please don't interpret this question as snide or mean. I always think these auto discussion become way too mean spirited. I can understand where you're coming from because I too can develop an opinion of a car just from seeing pictures and reading the company name on the car. In fact, from the pictures, and even sitting in it at the Washington auto show, my wife and I thought the MKZ was blah. But then when we were looking at a new Sable (I've always been interested in large cars) we test drove an MKZ that was on the lot and were very surprised how nice it was. This was after we had test drove a Lexus ES350. Replies to this message: savetheland (Aug 21, 2007 4:05 pm)
#24 of 26 Re: No suprise here [cowbell] by savetheland Aug 21, 2007 (4:05 pm)
Replying to: cowbell (Aug 21, 2007 7:41 am) I sat in MKZ several times in auto-shows and compared it side by side with Lexus ES. Design looks dated compared with new ES. As I understand Ford did not pay attention to Lincoln for many years and MKZ was half-baked product, while Toyota was pushing Lexus in earnest against Mercedes for many-many years. That creates the gap that Lincoln will need many years of honest development to close. And actually Lexus feels as a higher quality product than Mercedes. Mercedes still needs to raise its quality standards to catch with Toyota and may be it will never be able to do that. Of course it is autobahn certified, but who cares about it in USA? Yes - there is no much hope for Lincoln to compete with Lexus and Mercedes. But it still can compete with Buick. But I not so sure that Lincoln (or Buick) will survive in long run if Ford (and GM) will continue to treat it as it currently does. Hell, Ford could not make even Jaguar competitive in this segment and Jaguar had much better reputation as a luxury car maker than Lincoln!
#25 of 26 What is so horrible about a hood prop rod? by whateverdude Aug 22, 2007 (10:10 am)
Maybe I just don't know what I'm missing since I've never driven a car without one, but I find it hard to fathom why this would even be worth a complaint. If it was missing a remote trunk release (like the Mazda3 inexplicably does), now THAT would be annoying, since trunks are used almost every day. But how often do people even pop their hoods these days (especially a luxury car buyer), maybe a couple times a year? Are they really going to miss the 5 seconds of their life it takes to prop the hood? Replies to this message: gregg_vw (Aug 22, 2007 10:40 am)
#26 of 26 Re: What is so horrible about a hood prop rod? [whateverdude] by gregg_vw Aug 22, 2007 (10:40 am)
Replying to: whateverdude (Aug 22, 2007 10:10 am) Whatever, dude. I have a VW with hood struts (and therefore a hood that stays wherever you put it), and a car with a prop rod. Once you've had the strut supported hood, trust me, you don't want to be fooling with popping a prop rod in a hole just to open the hood.