Ask the Car People.SM


Who Pays for our Roads? - READ ONLY

82 messages,  Last post on Aug 07, 2012 at 12:39 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views-Archives Forum.

What is this discussion about? Automotive News

Messages Page 8 of 9

#63 of 82 Re: Motorcycle... [grbeck] by steve_ HOST

Nov 30, 2007 (10:47 pm)

Replying to: grbeck (Nov 27, 2007 11:28 am)
More on "the true costs of transportation."
 
Most drivers don't even know how much per mile it costs them to drive, much less how various subsidies come into play (ULI).
 
"U.S. roadway user fees fund only about 63% of total roadway costs. General taxes spent on roads average about 1.8¢ per vehicle mile. Vehicle user fees would need to increase by 59% to fully fund roadway costs.
 
It is sometimes argued that not all roadway costs should be charged to motorists. Even residents who never drive use road access for delivery of goods and services, walking and bicycling, and for utility lines. This can be addressed by establishing a standard of "basic access" that is unrelated to driving.
 
Many people assume incorrectly that pedestrians and cyclists pay less than their fair share of roadway costs because they do not pay fuel taxes or vehicle registration fees dedicated to highway funding. Local roads (the roads used most for walking and cycling) are mainly funded through general taxes that residents pay regardless of their travel patterns. Less than 10% of local road funding originates from vehicle user fees in the U.S."
 
(pdf file) from the Victoria Transport Policy Institute (link)
 
Still putting the social costs arguments on the back burner for a while longer.

#64 of 82 Re: Motorcycle... [steve_] by gagrice

Dec 01, 2007 (8:23 am)

Replying to: steve_ (Nov 30, 2007 10:47 pm)
"U.S. roadway user fees fund only about 63% of total roadway costs. General taxes spent on roads average about 1.8¢ per vehicle mile. Vehicle user fees would need to increase by 59% to fully fund roadway costs.
 
If we figure the Federal gas tax at 18 cents per gallon. The only people paying their fair share are the Hummer drivers getting 10 MPG. The guy driving a Prius is a leach on our society by that measure. I think the only fair way to tax for highway usage is by the mile as Oregon is experimenting with and CA is looking at. It would be easy to tie it in with a mandatory yearly smog check on ALL vehicles including hybrids and diesels. What ever the difference from the year before you pay 1.8 cents per mile. With the advent of EVs something will need to be done. There is already a lot of CNG drivers not paying road tax when they use a home fueling device.
 
We could tie a special tax on bikes, scooters, skateboards and wheelchairs.

#65 of 82 Re: Motorcycle... [gagrice] by steve_ HOST

Dec 01, 2007 (8:32 am)

Replying to: gagrice (Dec 01, 2007 8:23 am)
We could tie a special tax on bikes, scooters, skateboards and wheelchairs.
 
You left off walking and breathing.

#66 of 82 Re: Motorcycle... [steve_] by gagrice

Dec 01, 2007 (9:29 am)

Replying to: steve_ (Dec 01, 2007 8:32 am)
That will be covered by the Carbon Tax

#67 of 82 Re: Motorcycle... [gagrice] by vchiu

Dec 02, 2007 (5:27 am)

Replying to: gagrice (Nov 28, 2007 7:52 am)
> Unlike mass transit that only a few benefit from
 
That is the problem that explains why many roads are overcrowded, especially in urban areas, by single commuters in their (sometimes) big cars.
 
I personally favor the addition of an "infrastructure tax" on Gas to
1) fund roads up to 100% , including specific infrastructures paid by tolls
incidently tolls would be removed, which would save costs and lower the gas bill.
 
2) Fund alternative infrastructure, namely light rail, mass transit and inter-city high speed transit.
 
The Motorist would pay the real cost of gas (which is still cheap imho) and be offered more public transports as alternatives. Let us imagine after the necessary investments were done, that 20% of US population had access to public transport instead of 5% today (my own guess), then it would mean a potential of 15% fewer cars on the road.
 
Currently, everyone has the choice of his/her transport mean, provided that it is a car. This situation is unhealthy, but are we willing to go for a change?

#68 of 82 Re: Motorcycle... [vchiu] by gagrice

Dec 02, 2007 (7:20 am)

Replying to: vchiu (Dec 02, 2007 5:27 am)
That is the problem that explains why many roads are overcrowded, especially in urban areas, by single commuters in their (sometimes) big cars.
 
If you look at cities like NY and London that have mass transit for most of the people, there roads are totally impacted. So how did mass transit help? I do not have hard data on who does or does not have access to mass transit. I know the suburb I am moving out of has bus and trolley service. The buses and the trolley run near empty most of the time. How does that cut down on traffic or pollution in the case of the bus running empty? In 2003 it was costing San Diego $50,000,000 to subsidize the trolley system. I have used it a few times to avoid high cost parking. I still had to drive several miles to a station and park my car in a lot that is a known theft area.
 
Here is an interesting study on the subject:
 
Voodoo Economics won't work. I have to pay taxes to build roads and defend our oil supplies whether I drive or not, and fire trucks, ambulances, and delivery vehicles need streets to drive on. Pretending that I somehow avoid those "hidden costs" by taking the bus is beneath stupid. Telling me that 45 minutes in a crowded, lurching bus is better or a more effective use of my time than 20 minutes in my car is a couple of levels below that.
 
Wishful thinking won't cut it. It will do absolutely no good to say all these problems will go away if we can somehow persuade Americans to accept higher density and move back in from the suburbs. Suburbs began to sprawl back in the days of streetcars. Americans do not want to live in high density settings. Why not just accept it and plan accordingly?
 
Studies have repeatedly shown two things: the more transportation is available, the more people spread out. Second, commuters start to get irritable when commute times exceed half an hour. Basically, commuters move out to a distance where they feel the time cost is acceptable, and get angry when the rules change. Moral: Americans like to spread out until other individuals do not seriously impinge on their freedom of action. Deal with it.
 
http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/PSEUDOSC/MassTransit.HTM

#70 of 82 Bikes don't suck as much as Washington's ferries. by euphonium

Dec 03, 2007 (11:44 am)

Washington has the largest ferry system in the Union. They exist to service the transport of a minority, but very high income people from the mainland to their remote island homes in Puget Sound and the San Juans. The Bremerton ferry may be an exception to high income folk, but the point is the ferries are subsidized by the state's gas tax which reduces the maintenance of existing highways and roads. Ferry support also takes away the building of needed new roads. The state is divided by the Cascade Range and the folks in Eastern Washington, Southern Washington, & Central Washington directly subsidize the ferries in The Peoples Republic of Puget Sound.
 
If Oregon can charge by the mile and bikers pay their own way, how can the ferries be self supported by not being dependent on the gas tax?

#71 of 82 Re: Bikes don't suck as much as Washington's ferries. [euphonium] by nippononly

Dec 03, 2007 (8:50 pm)

Replying to: euphonium (Dec 03, 2007 11:44 am)
Don't ferries use fuel? Isn't it taxed?
 
Ditto other motorized forms of public transit.
 
And they all pay annual permit fees too.
 
Bikes are obviously the exception. It doesn't seem outrageous to me to require that bikes be required to have little license plates, just like motorcycles, with a fee to pay annually. Heck, don't you have to pay an annual fee to have a dog?

#72 of 82 Mass transit... [gagrice] by vchiu

Dec 04, 2007 (10:24 pm)

Replying to: gagrice (Dec 02, 2007 7:20 am)
>NY and London that have mass transit for most of the people, there roads are totally impacted
 
My short experience of those 2 cities tell me that maybe mass transit is practically reachable by maybe 25-30% of the population. whereas the very centre of cities have some reasonably present subway lines, those lines are often operating at maximum capacity. Otoh, further suburbs are very lightly connected. the neigbouring railway system is patchy and under-represented given the population and the overall transit needs. All those need gaps are compensated by car journeys.
 
I deliberately exclude the bus system as a mass transit system, unless it irrigates neigbouring mass transit station. A bus Journey will meet the same issues with clogged traffic and road usage. Reserved bus lines are a first step but can not replace a completely dedicated infrastructure.
 
The situation of London is worse with a decrepit tube that is badly in need of extensive refurbishment and development. There are a few railway lines which suffer the same fate and whom everybody agree on how unpleasant any trip may be. Only the Congestion Charge (CC) set-up by red Ken is starting to bend motor usage in the hypercenter and bring some cash in to start the always postponed work.
 
Yes, Mass transit need huge financing and return on investment is not as visible/quick as when you put your money on the market. I don't think of it as a replacement for individual transport but as an alternative to give people choice.
 
OK let me dream somehow. let me imagine some 600 Billion USD were not "invested" by some government in a middle east venture but spent in 100 Mass transit / alternative infrastructure projects in the US? Maybe this money would have been enough to make such transports available to, say 25% of the US population instead of 5%?
 
Your study talks about the problem of underfunded and inefficient public transport.
Naturally, people won't do self flogging and spend one hour of bus journey instead of 30 minutes by car (unless forced to). Modern mass transit offers good level of comfort and attractive speed, provided it is seriously planned, funded and implemented. It won't be done without government support anyway.

Messages Page 8 of 9

Advertisement

Browse by Category

Browse by Vehicle
   View All Vehicles

Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
View All Topics

Edmunds Community

Advertisement