You are here:
Forums
Hatchbacks
Mazda3
Article Comments - 2008 Subaru Impreza WRX vs. 2007 Mazdaspeed 3

146 messages, Last post on Dec 27, 2007 at 3:11 PM
You are in the Mazda3 Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer
Article comments for
Comparison Test: 2008 Subaru Impreza WRX vs. 2007 Mazdaspeed 3 - Although the Subaru's 5.9-second 0-60 time is two ticks better than the Mazda's 6.1-second clocking, it's all due to its traction advantage at launch. By the end of the quarter-mile, the two cars are dead even at 14.5 seconds and the Mazdaspeed 3 is going 98.7 mph compared to the WRX at 94.4 mph. Considering the difference in power ratings, none of this is surprising. (more)
|
Replying to: rsholland (Dec 22, 2007 7:21 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: aviboy97 (Dec 22, 2007 7:23 am) Bob |
|
|
Replying to: aviboy97 (Dec 22, 2007 7:21 am) Wow thats' terrible. I expect mine to have problems as it's 6 years old with over 200K on it. It's had a few problems but mostly small stuff. Subaru builds some great cars, but I guess a few slip through the cracks.
|
|
|
Replying to: tiff_c (Dec 22, 2007 9:44 am)
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: rsholland (Dec 22, 2007 6:00 am) I didn't think I'd like it either, but a test drive changed my mind. I actually prefer RWD; I bought the MS3 on a whim while I waited to see if Munich would make a truly sporting version of the 135i(looks like I'll wait in vain...). I find most AWD cars competent but extremely uninvolving to drive- especially on the track. The only AWD cars that I could see myself owning(not counting my wife's BMW truck) are the RS4, STi, and Evo. In the meantime, I'll take the MS3 to a few HPDEs and see how its "pit bull on crystal meth" character translates to the track environment... |
|
|
Replying to: aviboy97 (Dec 22, 2007 12:48 pm) I have a 2002 WRX and it's been great, a few issues here and there but I drive so much that these thing are just expected, plus the company will rent me a car when mine is in the shop. I've had a few issues and fuel economy is not really very good I think I get about 24mpg on the highway which I mostly drive. I get less now probably but I stopped measuring it after the first year. too depressing but I'm reimbursed 35 cents a mile so in 200K that amounts to $70,000! since 2002! But not all of that is on the company so I really haven't worried about repairs. The new STI is a possibility but my kids are in college and that costs $$$$$. Awesome in snow with Nokian tires but I have quotes out on a Mazdaspeed3. No AWD but good performance and I might get a job that requires less driving as it's really killing me to drive that much. Subaru makes great cars but better fuel economy would be a big selling point for me.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: tiff_c (Dec 22, 2007 7:50 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: merrycynic (Dec 22, 2007 8:20 pm) It's actually more than that I'm not counting times the Rex was in the shop and I had a rental or the times lately I've driven my wifes car. The company will not provide a company car for me. I think they get a better deduction by paying my mileage? Well either way I'm worn out from doing it. My license takes a risk every time I'm out on the highways. Thankfully nothing has broken lately or I might have missed my vacation. My boss can't even reach me My Rex is pretty rough right now, last legs really. I have a suc... I mean a buyer for it! |
|
|
mazda= ford junk unless it has a rotary then it is quality subie= quality |
|
|
Replying to: deskman (Dec 23, 2007 8:03 am) 5port 08 Speed3
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Hatchbacks
Mazda3
Article Comments - 2008 Subaru Impreza WRX vs. 2007 Mazdaspeed 3
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2009 Mazda MAZDASPEED MAZDA3



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats