You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Cadillac CTS/CTS-V
Inside Line 2008 Cadillac CTS First Drive, Full Test and Long Term

55 messages, Last post on Jul 17, 2009 at 6:09 PM
You are in the Cadillac CTS/CTS-V Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
First Drive: 2008 Cadillac CTS - This substantial 2.0-inch track increase improves handling, as it's easier to manage body roll and weight transfer. The new ZF Servotronic steering forward of the axle (a packaging measure largely related to the availability of all-wheel drive) improves steering precision. (more)
Full Test: 2008 Cadillac CTS V6 DI - Cadillac has stopped trying to be German, something it is not. Instead it has rediscovered itself and produced a uniquely American sport sedan without peer. That's a bold statement for sure, but name another American car like the 2008 Cadillac CTS. (more)
Long-Term Test: 2008 Cadillac CTS V6 DI - What We Bought: It all starts with the engine. With the 550-horsepower supercharged LS9 not being available for the CTS until next year, we were left with only two engine choices: a 3.6-liter V6 or a 3.6-liter V6. One has the benefit of direct fuel injection and makes 39 more horses. (more)
|
ITS THE FAMILY TRUCKSTER!!! OFF TO WALLY WORLD! |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: abqhudson (Sep 29, 2007 12:44 pm) |
|
| How does the ride quality compare to my current car a Chrysler 300c , with run flats? | |
|
Replying to: KarenS (Jul 26, 2007 11:07 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: jkross22 (Jul 29, 2007 11:23 pm) As far as what gas costs, if you can afford this car you don't worry to much about the gas cost. So what if it costs you $400 a year more in gas to drive. (16,000 mi/year divide by 21 mpg = 761.9 gals used versus at say 26 mpg = 615.4 gals used, the difference in gallons used times $3/gal = $439.54). If they did a diesel or hybrid their target buyers wouldn't buy the car.
|
|
|
Replying to: bonddog (Oct 07, 2007 2:59 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: avatards (Oct 07, 2007 3:47 pm) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: bonddog (Oct 07, 2007 3:27 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: sevenfeet0 (Oct 07, 2007 4:10 pm) |
|
|
|
|
I'm leaning toward buying a CTS and decided I needed to test drive the G35 before making a decision. There are clearly some advantages to the G35, most especially the $7000 price difference in the G35's favor. Styling wise, I think the CTS wins, at least for me. It felt more unique and had an agressive feel that just says "Get outta my way!" Second the G's tiny (by comparison) sunroof was another notch in the CTS belt. I live in the sunbelt so the cooled seats are a unique feature that seems really usefull. Still there are a few really bothersome details for the Caddy that it really should have for the price: Most importantly missing is integrated blue tooth for my phone. Sure, they can add it aftermarket ($500) but you have to wonder how well it will really function. Will it mute the stereo when you make a call.? Will it store your phone book and activate by voice? Will it tranfer calls in progress from your phone to your car and back again as you enter and exit? All other comparably priced cars in this range include bluetooth capability so to me it is conspicuously absent. Also missing is a rear backup camera. I really loved the Infiniti's and the Caddy's caution to red proximity indicator is a reallly second class substitute. An in the ceiling sunglass holder to keep your sunglasses handy without having to reach behind you into the console really should have been thought of. Also annoying was the mechanical sounding voice for the voice control. It was definitely out of sync with the many other polished features of this sumptuous car. Even my '04 Accord I'm driving now has a choice between a sexy female and a sexy male voice. In the same vein, I found the ugly old school black satellite antenna mast to be jarring and diruptive to the cars otherwise flawless exterior. Everyone else has either a body color "bump" or a shark fin style antenna. Either of these would be better at not disrupting the Caddy's style. There are a few other features where the Infiniti comes out ahead too. The drivers seat is much more supportive with it's adjustable side bolsters and extending thigh support. It really made me feel much more a part of the car as I drove it. Also welcom in the G car was the brushed metal accents on the dash (as opposed to the Caddy's wood). I guess it's personal preference, but to me the wood trim made the CTS seem a bit "stuffy". Cadillac should definitely realize that not everyone likes wood. In spite of all these flaws, to me, I think the CTS wins by a nose over the G35. For most people it will come down to personal preference. In my book the G35 just doesn't make me feel as "unique" on the road as the CTS. I may, however, just drive my Accord another year and see if Cadillac fixes at least a few of these flaws in 2009 . . . . |
|
You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Cadillac CTS/CTS-V
Inside Line 2008 Cadillac CTS First Drive, Full Test and Long Term
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Cadillac CTS



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats