Sign In Join 



2008 Volvo XC70/V70

97 messages,  Last post on Oct 17, 2009 at 6:40 PM

You are in the Volvo V70 Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Volvo XC70, Volvo V70, Future Vehicle, Wagon


Messages Page 10 of 10
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#88 of 97
'08 vs '07 comparision by rusty104
Dec 10, 2008 (4:14 pm)
Reply
My wife has an '07 XC70 which I drive occasionally. While we were on a recent trip we were rented a car which to our suprise was an '08 XC70. Based on that rental there is no way I would change her '07 for an '08. The 3.2 on the new model is MUCH louder when you step on the gas and MUCH less powerful at lower speeds. I think the noise on acceleration is the worse of the two. Hopefully for Volvo the '09 turbo solves both those problems.
Other items of I noted between the two years:
Where the "08 is better in my opinion:
1. Quieter and less wind noise. (Unless you are passing a car and step on the gas)
2. The interior is classier.
Items I can't believe Volvo has done or not done:
 
1.One of the reasons I bought the Volvo was for safety reasons. One of the options I insisted on my wife's '07 was the Xenon headlamps. ( I think it listed for less than $800 and came with the ABL feature, which I have on my car too, but could do without). However I view being able to see well at night an important safety issue and the Xenon lights improve that situation.
Now it appears as though you have to buy a $2000+ package to get Xenon. That is crazy.
2. On both the '07 and '08 I am irritated that the sun visor doesn't move down the metal rod to block the sun when you move it to the driver's door.
3. Although not a safety issue, an annoyance - the headlamp lighting system is really not totally automatic. Unless you want to have the headlamps on all the time, you have to manually turn the switch at night to the on position if you want to use the high beams.
4. I did not care for the new key, it seems as though it is something that will eventually break and in the interim is a pain,
 
Although the above are complaints, I really like my wife's car for many reasons.
#89 of 97
Re: '08 vs '07 comparision [rusty104] by bodble2
Dec 10, 2008 (6:59 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rusty104 (Dec 10, 2008 4:14 pm)

You mean the headlights are really just auto-off headlights, that turn on and off with the ignition?
#90 of 97
2007 XC90 3.2 by jim314
Dec 11, 2008 (1:11 am)
Reply
I personally find the 3.2 L inline six in my 2007 plenty powerful. When it is said that it is less powerful at lower output than the V8 or other powerplants, I can only assume that this means that to develop a lot of power from the 3.2, you have to depress the accelerator more, and go to higher rpm. So I would say that the accelerator program in the 3.2 is what it is under the assumption that normally the driver wants to be moderate in acceleration (to achieve better fuel economy and put less wear on the drivetrain). To hotrod the 3.2 just lay into the accelerator (and accept a much lower mpg)! The 3.2 develops 235 hp maximum, which I hardly ever want it to develop. I don't mind the engine sound when I do occassionally wind it out to 4500 rpm in a challenging freeway entrance.
 
This weekend I was a passenger in a Lexus LX470? SUV with a V8 that the 25-year-old driver was driving "agressively" on freeways. It was smooth and powerful and I think it gets lower mpg than my XC90 3.2. Costs a lot more too. I looked at the tach and it seemed that at the same vehicle speed the rpm was lower in the Lexus than in my XC90 3.2 (which cost $33k brand new). I can live with that.
 
Concerning the light swich, the only difference I find in the two positions with the headlights on is that in the "nightime" position the brights can be switched on. In the other position the brights can only be on as long as the stalk is held pulled toward the steering wheel. In my 1996 850 I think the daytime headlamps were at reduced power (which I liked), but in the 2007 XC90 I think they are at full power in both position I and III. It might be possible for the dealer to deactivate the headlights on in position I. In places where there is no daytime running light requirement some drivers would not want them, even if they were a safety advantage. Daytime running (head) lights (at full power) must cause much more rapid headlamp failure.
#91 of 97
Re: Rattles [nibs] by carmom14
Dec 16, 2008 (5:47 pm)
Reply

Replying to: nibs (Aug 05, 2008 1:47 pm)

I just got whacked in the head by my tailgate. It won't stay open. The tailgate goes up and then it quickly slams shut. I can't even hold it open. Is this what happened to your tailgate?
#92 of 97
Re: Rattles [carmom14] by jim314
Dec 16, 2008 (11:33 pm)
Reply

Replying to: carmom14 (Dec 16, 2008 5:47 pm)

This happened a couple of years back on my 2004 V70. The gas cartridges which hold up the tailgate failed. In my case the dealer replaced them at no charge under the overall warranty (3 yr, 36 kmi?). These are easy to replace in most cars, but more of a problem with the V70 because they are hidden under plastic trim. Removing the plastic trim without breaking it requires experience and skill. In the XC90 the cartridges are exposed.
 
Get thee to the dealer!
#93 of 97
Re: Rattles [carmom14] by nibs
Feb 15, 2009 (7:06 am)
Reply

Replying to: carmom14 (Dec 16, 2008 5:47 pm)

Hi Carmom, sorry I didn't get back to you. It has been a while since I've been here. No my problem was with the auto tailgate motor failure. Btw the tailgate still has problems. Since my last report I have been back to the service center several times.
 
I have submitted a claim through CAMVAP (Canadian Motor Vehicle Arbitration Process) and hope it proves to be a successful process. I'm not trusting of anything or anyone right now.
 
The tailgate seems to break the seal when cornering or going over cracks in the pavement. I'm fed up with it and hope the arbitration will see this a a reliability issue. Apparently my XC70 is the only one with problems.
#94 of 97
2008 Volvo XC70 Update[nibs] by nibs
Mar 24, 2009 (3:20 pm)
Reply

Replying to: nibs (Feb 15, 2009 7:06 am)

UPDATE. I went through the CAMVAP process in an effort to have Volvo Canada buy my car back. For your interest and for those of you that are as unfortunate as I was to get a lemon, I was successful! Say so long to my last Volvo. Best of luck to each of you and I've updated the Carfax history today. Hopefully this car will not be resold.
#95 of 97
Last Volvo Post by nibs
Apr 26, 2009 (7:08 am)
Reply
My 08 XC70 has been bought back by Volvo Canada. It is still sitting on the dealer lot two months later. I replaced it with a BMW. I am very pleased because this car is everything that the Volvo should have been considering the Volvo price and PR. There are no creaks or noises coming from the hatch on Bimmer. The interior is very quiet and the handling is a dream. Fuel economy is better too.
 
Best of luck to all of you.
#96 of 97
Re: Last Volvo Post [nibs] by bodble2
Jun 04, 2009 (5:45 pm)
Reply

Replying to: nibs (Apr 26, 2009 7:08 am)

Congrats on the victory. Chalk another one up for the good guys! CAMVAP is great.
 
Which Bimmer did you end up getting? One of the Touring models?
#97 of 97
when push on petal to start...???? by savannahtx
Oct 17, 2009 (6:40 pm)
Reply
when I start to push on the petal to begin to move it feels like the first second or so it "misses" or is not catching or something..then it is like it goes to second gear and then it catches...strange feeling like it almost ..slips past the begining of what I guess is first gear in an automatic and then catches and it feels like it wants to go. Also, I had a 1997 that had the "power" button when I wanted 'extra' power to go faster in a hurry....like pulling onto an interstate....I miss that power surge....it feels like the transmission is slippin when I begin to push on the petal...is that normal...my old on did not do it. I am also driving a 1985 ..240 Wagon....just about falling apart in many ways but it runs and past the state inspection....and "yes" I am Volvoized...can't really imagine drivng anything else....I had a Volvo rubberized mat in the back of my 1997...Wagon....All I can find now is a "hard" plastic mat of sorts for the rear of the 2008 Wagon....is there a soft Volvo rubber mat for the 2008? This 2008 sure likes to use up the gas...not great on the gas but nice car in many other ways....

Messages Page 10 of 10
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement