Ask the Car People.SM


Are Larger Wheels and Tires a Waste of Money? - READ ONLY

59 messages,  Last post on Dec 04, 2008 at 1:23 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views-Archives Forum.

What is this discussion about? Automotive News, Sedan

Messages Page 7 of 7

#54 of 59 Re: 17" or 18" wheels on a 2008 VW GLI [warhub] by texases

Mar 24, 2008 (7:19 pm)

Replying to: warhub (Mar 24, 2008 7:05 pm)
If you weren't liking the looks of the 18s so much, I'd say go with the 17s, because you could get good performance rubber in the 17's size, but if you really like the 18s look, go for it. Only thing to check is friends/acquaintences with low profile tires, see what they say.
 
edit - only other concern is if you expect to loan the car out. No one will be as careful as you, and they will find every pot hole and curb in town!

#55 of 59 Re: 17" or 18" wheels on a 2008 VW GLI [warhub] by 210delray

Mar 24, 2008 (7:56 pm)

Replying to: warhub (Mar 24, 2008 7:05 pm)
Ah, New York. Love the city, but it's tough on cars. I'd get the 17s.

#56 of 59 Re: Are Larger Wheels / Tires a Waste of Money? [habitat1] by ruking1

Dec 02, 2008 (6:38 pm)

Replying to: habitat1 (Jul 14, 2007 1:48 pm)
A real leveler would be cost per mile driven.
 
For your standard tires example it is $750/35,000 miles=
 
$ .0214285 cents.
 
sport tires $1,400/15,000=
 
$.0933333 cents
 
$ .09333 - $ .0214285= $ .07190/ $ .09333=
 
77% more per mile driven. If you are used to spending $ .0214285 why would you want to spend 4.355 TIMES MORE?
 
So using 185/70/14 tires with most of the mileage in a plain jane everyday commute, I got 74,300 miles from oem tires. Replacement costs are a $ 49. per tire and $ 60. for removal, disposal, new valves, mount, balance or $ 256/ 74,300 miles =.0034454. The math indicates an almost obscene difference. I LOVE the MB E350, but the math is far too overwhelming to ignore, especially for commuting.
 
What do you think will happen when you curb a (probably forged, AKA even BIGGER BUX) exotic rim vs say the steel one used with the 185/70/14 tires? I can probably say that tops, the steel one will cost $50 and that is Fed Ex'd to the front door.

#57 of 59 TESTING... TESTING! TESTING? by ruking1

Dec 03, 2008 (1:06 pm)

While I do not haunt car magazines, I very rarely see before and after testing with the performance parameters neatly laid out. (for the purposes of this discussion before and after larger wheels and tires etc,) . The closest I have seen are www.tire rack.com 's testing the variables they are usually testing for: SAME SIZED in the SAME category tire brands.
 
The sense I have is larger sizes in addition to the discussed higher acquisition costs, hit performance: ie.,LOWER mpg, stopping distance, hp at the wheels, ride compliance/comfort etc. So it would seem defining the purposes and then seeing if the engineering adaptation makes sense is the first order of business in the "upgrade" Indeed given the original example of oem engineered upgrades, there is STILL no definitive testing/comparison.

#58 of 59 Re: TESTING... TESTING! TESTING? [ruking1] by karsick

Dec 03, 2008 (8:20 pm)

Replying to: ruking1 (Dec 03, 2008 1:06 pm)
GREAT TOPIC!
 
(too bad I didn't catch it earlier)
 
Somebody REALLY needs to tell those retarded McLaren & Ferrari Formula One engineers that they need to replace their silly, ineffective balloon-like tires & wheels with some Stylin' Fo-shizzle Chromey DubDeuces (spinnazzzz preferably) and micro-sidewall 20-series lo-pros.
 
Seriously, for anyone with a logical bone in their head, there is a diminishing return with ever-increasing wheel size, and most carmakers have crossed that line.
 
For the same $$$ you would have spent on frequent mega-dollar re-tires, I'm convinced you could get the world's strongest & lightest forged alloys in a modest 15"-16" size, a set of dedicated track & ice tires, along with a WRC-worthy Ohlins or DMS suspension setup.
 
With a proper set-up of lightweight, reasonable-size running stock, you could run RINGS around the guy with the cheeeeezy dubs, and even laugh at bad pavement along the way.

#59 of 59 Re: TESTING... TESTING! TESTING? [ruking1] by berri

Dec 04, 2008 (1:23 pm)

Replying to: ruking1 (Dec 03, 2008 1:06 pm)
These huge tires are a total waste of money unless you're in it for styling. They cost a fortune, wear out more quickly, ride harsher and tend to do worse in wet or snow conditions. Interestingly though, Toyota seems to be getting big into these big wheels as in Highlander and Venza.

Messages Page 7 of 7

Advertisement

Browse by Category

Browse by Vehicle
   View All Vehicles

Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
View All Topics

Edmunds Community

Advertisement