Sign In Join 



2008/09 Subaru Impreza STI

417 messages,  Last post on Jun 24, 2009 at 9:51 AM

You are in the Subaru Impreza Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Subaru Impreza WRX STi, Hatchback, Sedan


Messages Page 40 of 43
1
...
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#385 of 417
Edmunds long-term STI wrap up by rsholland
May 08, 2009 (5:13 am)
Reply
They had for a year, put over 20K on it; and, for the most part, HATED it.
 
http://blogs.edmunds.com/roadtests/2009/05/2008-subaru-impreza-wrx-sti-parting-s- hots.html#more?mktcat=enabler&AID=10364102&PID=3202266&kw=N&synpartner=edmunds&m- ktid=cj260233
 
Bob
#386 of 417
Re: Edmunds long-term STI wrap up [rsholland] by dino001
May 08, 2009 (7:12 am)
Reply

Replying to: rsholland (May 08, 2009 5:13 am)

But many of the very reasons they hated it were exactly ones I like mine, so it very much is kind of eye of the beholder. One thing I have to admit - I would never pay anything close to the full price - and the car was a compromise to me due to their "No manual GT Wagon for you" policy. I got it with with VIP, 2500 cash AND 0% 60 mo financing.
 
Without that no way I would get it. And mine doesn't have a fluff of the BBS wheels or Nav - just plain base one. At that time it was just a couple of grand or less from what I would have paid for '09 WRX Premium, even with VIP deal and not counting in financing discount.
#387 of 417
Re: Edmunds long-term STI wrap up [rsholland] by ateixeira
May 08, 2009 (7:33 am)
Reply

Replying to: rsholland (May 08, 2009 5:13 am)

It's supposed to be a polarizing car. I don't think there's anything wrong with their hating it - Subaru did not make the compromises Edmunds editors' would have liked to see to make it a cushy daily driver.
 
Owners are willing to make that sacrifice.
 
Heck, 2008 base WRX owners complained it had lost its edge and was too refined.
#388 of 417
Re: Edmunds long-term STI wrap up [ateixeira] by dino001
May 08, 2009 (9:37 am)
Reply

Replying to: ateixeira (May 08, 2009 7:33 am)

Read it again, Juice . Their complaints were exactly opposite, - too many compromises. They hated it because it wasn't hardcore enough for them, they kept repeating how much better Evo was as a rally-bred car. Read also their long-term article, it explains their mindset even better.
#389 of 417
Re: Edmunds long-term STI wrap up [dino001] by ateixeira
May 11, 2009 (11:11 am)
Reply

Replying to: dino001 (May 08, 2009 9:37 am)

I stopped reading the blogs when work got a lot busier for me.
#390 of 417
Hey...Recent Posts by sbcooke
May 14, 2009 (4:09 pm)
Reply
I love my STI. Edmunds has a lot of complaints about it that are valid...but other cars that might even be worse don't get the same scrutiny because there is no evo to compare against it. I got a great price at the time and after about 6K miles still enjoy taking it out everyday.
 
The comments about it being a bad road trip vehicle are not accurate in my opinion. Sure, it is smaller than an SUV, but it still has plenty of room to pack away family gear, have the kids watch videos in the back and the highway ride is pretty good. I have done close to 5-6 hours in the seats and they are extremely comfortable. I did change out the summer tires for Michelin Pilot Sport A/S Plus, so perhaps that has made the ride even better for me.
 
Perhaps my satisfaction comes from the fact that I don't have an evo to drive to compare...so I am left with nothing but the fun parts of the STI and cannot complain about how it handles, the cornering, etc.
 
I have been reading a little bit about driving techniques on a competitor forum...and addressing the body roll before the corner by breaking hard and accelerating through makes a huge handling difference. Once the initial weight transfer is complete, it smokes through corners and even handles switch-backs easily.
#391 of 417
Re: Edmunds long-term STI wrap up [ateixeira] by tsy
May 18, 2009 (12:24 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ateixeira (May 11, 2009 11:11 am)

I stopped reading the blogs when I could see there was no changing the editor's sense of the car. It's an extremely capable car that you can drive comfortably everyday. You could do that in the Evo but where I live you'd need back surgery after a year! Some minor mods to the suspension tighten the car up significantly for those that want to feel like they're driving a skateboard.
 
Oh well, it's good that the test is over. Send that poor STi to an owner that will appreciate it!
 
tom
#392 of 417
Re: Edmunds long-term STI wrap up [tsy] by ateixeira
May 18, 2009 (12:29 pm)
Reply

Replying to: tsy (May 18, 2009 12:24 pm)

I don't really fit in the Evo's Recaros, so I can't even test drive one.
#393 of 417
Re: Edmunds long-term STI wrap up [ateixeira] by kyfdx HOST
May 18, 2009 (6:37 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ateixeira (May 18, 2009 12:29 pm)

I couldn't fit in the old STi, either... I didn't think my butt was that wide, but it's like I was perched on the bolsters...
 
The new model, no problem..
#394 of 417
Plan on this... by stivt1962
May 21, 2009 (5:08 am)
Reply
I have 10K on my '08 STi. I bought it for about the same price as a regular WRX. Have no regrets - car is amazing and still a great Daily Driver and family hauler.
 
To get the performance and mileage you'd expect, buying a catted Downpipe and doing a Cobb Tune is critical, easy and not very expensive. With that, and sway bars, the car is still a great daily driver but incredibly rewarding to drive. It is tame around town, but a monster when you open it up. The low and midrange come to life. Complaints about it being soft on the track don't translate to the rough streets, especially with the sway bars, since some give keeps the car stable in rough terrain in corners. The car is designed to be stable in rough terrain, not to maximize G's on the track. Reviewers seem to miss that real world reality. Plus, we all tend to modify the car anyway.
 
This car, with those 'light' mods is highly recommended. I liked the Mitsu a lot too, but not as a daily driver. The Subie is more versatile and has a nicer interior, the Mitsu is better on the track - especially when both are in stock form. The choice then is more about preference and what you're going to use the car for primarily. I don't think one is "better" than the other.
 
The WRX (non STi) is a bargain though - were it not for the discount, I would have gone for that. My only disappointment with the car is that my previous WRX with mods got 30 MPG average much of the time - mileage with this is 6 MPG lower in same conditions. Subaru should consider direct injection to boost mileage, and perhaps work on aerodynamics.

Messages Page 40 of 43
1
...
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement