Sign In Join 



Chevy Colorado and GMC Canyon - V8 for 2008

60 messages,  Last post on Jul 16, 2008 at 3:38 PM

You are in the Chevrolet Colorado and GMC Canyon Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Chevrolet Colorado, GMC Canyon, Engine, Truck


Messages Page 5 of 7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#35 of 60
Re: V8 delay [poncho167] by greenjeanz
Nov 22, 2007 (1:15 pm)
Reply

Replying to: poncho167 (Nov 18, 2007 5:36 am)

Oh well,they will get it together eventually.GM will be coming out with a diesel version of the Colorado for the USA,just don't know when.Whoever comes out with a small diesel truck will basicly own the truck sales here,for years.I get a big discount with Ford(X-Plan),but I really like the Colorado better then the Ranger,so I bought one.My next truck,I would like it to be the diesel version of the Colorado,but whoever comes out with a small 4X4 diesel,will have my bidness.Happy Thanksgiving everyone
#36 of 60
DIESEL FUEL COSTS TOO MUCH by mark4biodiesel
Feb 19, 2008 (10:24 pm)
Reply
If you guys read my posts from day one, you will see that propane is a much beter option as any of the existing gasoline engines can be converted aftermarket.
  There are no savings for diesel fuel when compared to the pump price of propane, performance and government tax breaks bot federal and state or province.
   Diesel fuel 20 years ago was half the price of gasoline but now it cost more. A LPG fueld engine will last longer than a diesel with less wear, cleaner emissions, less maintence and significantly less cost per mile to operate.
  Any person who thinks diesel is better is blowing smoke and when you have driven commercial cars and trucks on both fuels totaling 1/1/2 million miles, then you are qualified to disagree with me. I have used LPG for 26 years as of 2008 in cars and trucks and fleet discounts off pump prices are significant. Most trucking compnaies used to get significant diesel fuel discounts from the majors but that was then and this is 2008. The old is dead, desisted, gone, expired, DOA, and non existant, just like that damm MP parrot. Wake up guys and smell the coffee, OPEC does not control LPG but they do control gasoline and diesel fuel prices. How do we let Mexico stay part of NAFTA when they are full members of OPEC?
  LPG is supplied by more than the majors and therefore thy lost control of it 35 years ago. They used to give it away free in Alberta 30 years ago because it costs money to store it for long periods.
  Propane is 105 octane and we all know how well the engines run today with high octane gasoline and the computer knock sensors. They produce 2% more power than gasoline with the latest port fuel injection systems and loose about 10% MPG due to the much lower BTU of propane. Trust me, when you you see the engine oil stay clean for 3,000 miles on LPG, theyyou cnnot compae diesel oil which turns dark within about 100 miles.
  Diesel fumes cause brain cancer which causes dementia so i expect you all to yell at me....lol Go ahead and yell, you may wake yourselves up...lol
#37 of 60
Diesel vs. propane. by greenjeanz
Feb 20, 2008 (5:09 am)
Reply
I have experience in diesels pal.I drove long haul for years pulling double tankers.In short,it ain't my first rodeo.I also have a diesel tractor weighing in at a bit over 2 1/2 tons that I need to haul to jobs locally.In the long run,I doubt the engine running on propane would last.It is still a frail GAS engine despite the conversion.Gas engines just aren't built with strong enough parts to haul heavy loads on a daily basis.Yes,propane is cheaper,but not by much here.I would rather run b-50 or higher biodiesel.
#38 of 60
Re: DIESEL FUEL COSTS TOO MUCH [mark4biodiesel] by rocketman67
Feb 20, 2008 (6:43 am)
Reply

Replying to: mark4biodiesel (Feb 19, 2008 10:24 pm)

I agree that Propane would be a better way for us to go for the the vehicles that most consumers drive.
Let the big rigs stay with diesel where it belongs and or other heavy duty uses.
#39 of 60
Let's redirect... by kcram HOST
Feb 20, 2008 (2:30 pm)
Reply
this discussion is about V8s in the Colorado and Canyon. Thanks!
 
kcram - Pickups Host
#40 of 60
Re: DIESEL FUEL COSTS TOO MUCH [mark4biodiesel] by poncho167
Feb 23, 2008 (6:28 am)
Reply

Replying to: mark4biodiesel (Feb 19, 2008 10:24 pm)

Hank Hill will definately support you on that propane fuel.
#41 of 60
Speaking of V-8's..... by greenjeanz
Feb 23, 2008 (7:48 am)
Reply
Has anyone even seen the V-8 Colorado yet? Last I checked,the I-5 is still the biggest engine option.
-greenjeans
#42 of 60
Re: Speaking of V-8's..... [greenjeanz] by jsouth
Feb 23, 2008 (5:44 am)
Reply

Replying to: greenjeanz (Feb 23, 2008 7:48 am)

I heard that the V8 would be in the 2008 in March but now someone said it would be 2009, I guess you can hear anything. We will just have to wait and see or if anyone else knows out there please tell us.
#43 of 60
2009 redesign by brianma
Feb 23, 2008 (8:53 pm)
Reply
I did a lot of research on what this could entail as I'm very close to buying a 2008 Colorado. The best sources for model changes are the suppliers, as they need lead times of at least 6 months to get the prototypes built for testing on the assembly line. Looking at models from sister companies sharing the underpinnings is another way to look ahead. Wards has listed very few 355 platform contracts. Due to key interior supplier for the 355 platform Plastech going into bankruptcy, GM will most likely have little chance to get much new into the interior of the Colorado/Canyon/Hummer (Isuzu is dead as of July so not in the mix). Exterior changes appear to be in the front fascia with the rumor being a new face like a junior Silverado/Sierra being the sole 2009 change. The H3t interior showed very few new items with a prototype multi-function steering wheel the biggest change. Under the hood will most likely include the rumored V-8 with displacement on demand technology and a revised shift on the fly 4x4 setup. A diesel is most likely not in the early 2009 build mix based on the lack of contracts for key diesel accessory pieces. Some 2.9 L 4 cylinder changes indicate the engine may be ULEV/50 state for 2009 in all trim levels. General appears to have the tire contract into 2009 based on volumes contracted. A third suspension option appears to be part of the V-8 package and has been contracted. That's all I could find in the quasi-public domain. Unless you want a V-8, I don't think it's worth waiting for the 2009 models.
#44 of 60
Re: Speaking of V-8's..... [greenjeanz] by mark4biodiesel
Feb 24, 2008 (5:56 am)
Reply

Replying to: greenjeanz (Feb 23, 2008 7:48 am)

The 5.3 liter V8 Colorado has been delayed til the 09 model year as the rear end had to be beefed up to handle the torque for it's intended use which is towing and street racing the ricers. LOL. JK.
   The extra weight of the beefier rear diff and axles is 60 pounds. It is all steel/iron unlike the aluminum rear in the 5 cylinder unit.
Since the base frame is a very light duty deal, there will be some stronger cross members added with stronger gussets where the rear bolts to the frame.
   To see the new rear in the flesh, go look under an 08 baby Hummer with V8.
   If GM is smart, they will offer an SS version.

Messages Page 5 of 7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement