You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Mercedes-Benz C-Class
Article Comments - Full Test: 2008 Mercedes-Benz C350 Sport

26 messages, Last post on May 13, 2008 at 12:12 AM
You are in the Mercedes-Benz C-Class Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
Article comments for Full Test: 2008 Mercedes-Benz C350 Sport - This week, we managed to pry a 2008 Mercedes-Benz C350 away from its press introduction in Portland, Oregon, and drove it all the way back to our offices in Santa Monica, California. What we learned on this 1,000-mile drive and after instrumented track testing shows us that Mercedes-Benz is serious about the C-Class' competition. (more)
|
Replying to: fighter1 (Jun 29, 2007 7:49 am) to be considered "a joke," you'd have to compare to a 335i, which is more expensive. The benz falls appropriately in between the 220hp 328 and 300hp 335 in terms of price. |
|
This is a vehicle that is outperformed by a FWD TL in every category, for a lot less money, plus, the TL is superbly more reliable. How long does Mercedes think a three pointed emblem automaticaly means a 10K premium for a car???? As other Mercedes vehicles it may sell well among those that have no inkling of automotive excellence, but will never sell to someone that test drives a car before he buys it. At least a 335 can justify its premium price.
|
|
|
|
| Unless Mercedes has been playing with the gear ratios, the new C350 will get worse gas mileage, less top end and poorer highway acceleration than the old C350. Why? Cuz it weighs a bit more, has same motor but worse aerodynamics. 0.3 vs 0.26 | |
|
Replying to: 6sptl (Jun 29, 2007 10:40 am) As for the 335, yes it is faster. How much faster do you need to go? 0-60 in 6.2 seconds is plenty fast for me. While I would personally prefer the 3-series, my wife prefers the C-class. Any difference in handling is lost on her and she prefers the C-class ride and styling. |
|
|
Hopefully the looks will stay fresh on this new styling direction. Mercedes styling seems perishible these days. But they will never be as ugly or generic as an Acura, of course the'll never be quite as reliable either! |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: 6sptl (Jun 29, 2007 10:40 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: hailalmamater (Jul 06, 2007 9:59 am) |
|
| Oh my God. My wife wont be able to race a 335i on city streets because it's underpowered. Oooooooooooooh. Is it out of the question to consider that MB had no intention of trying to compete with the ugly BMW 335i with the 350 Sport? | |
|
I sell Mercedes-Benz for a living. It is amazing how one sided a review can be. Reviewers ought to get second opinions that are objective before making a decree about a car. The reviewer says that the new C-class package is ugly, but the overwhelming reaction to the sport package C300 and C350 is WOW! People love the new body, espacially the front end. The article also says the price is out of whack for the C350. This is complete nonsense. The C350's we have on our lot right now are all around $39k. At BMW, you will pay $37 or $38k for the 328i. People can't believe the value of the C350. The new C-class is much better than the old one, in every way. I drive them both everyday, so I know the differences. I respect the opinions of the reviewer, and I understand that not everyone loves the new look of the car. But there is no way to deny the value of the car now compared to the old car. The old C-class was like driving a Toyota Corrola in some ways, the new one is a true Mercedes-Benz. M-B clients do not want a car that beats them up while driving. They want the perfect blend of comfort and sport, which is what they are getting with the new C-class. |
|
|
Replying to: 500lbman (Sep 09, 2007 1:56 pm) |
|
You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Mercedes-Benz C-Class
Article Comments - Full Test: 2008 Mercedes-Benz C350 Sport
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
1991 Mercedes-Benz 350-Class



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats