Sign In Join 



2009 Honda Ridgeline

90 messages,  Last post on Sep 13, 2009 at 10:41 AM

You are in the Honda Ridgeline Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Honda Ridgeline, Toyota Tacoma, Nissan Frontier, Future Vehicle, Truck


Messages Page 2 of 10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
10
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#8 of 90
Re: 09 Ridgeline [blufz1] by moparbad
Jun 27, 2007 (8:30 am)
Reply

Replying to: blufz1 (Jun 26, 2007 8:25 pm)

Never.
#9 of 90
Re: 09 Ridgeline [moparbad] by blufz1
Jun 27, 2007 (9:30 am)
Reply

Replying to: moparbad (Jun 27, 2007 8:30 am)

Dude, you've been wrong so many times. I take that as a "more likely than not" in the future.
#10 of 90
Re: 09 Ridgeline [blufz1] by moparbad
Jun 27, 2007 (5:08 pm)
Reply

Replying to: blufz1 (Jun 27, 2007 9:30 am)

Dude, you've been wrong so many times. I take that as a "more likely than not" in the future.
 
Your statement is B.S. Unless you can prove it, which will be darn difficult to do since it is false.
 
Dude is a RUDE form of address.
#11 of 90
Re: 09 Ridgeline [moparbad] by blufz1
Jun 27, 2007 (5:23 pm)
Reply

Replying to: moparbad (Jun 27, 2007 5:08 pm)

Mobad. This is just conversation and it seems logical since the extended cab is the most popular style of Pickup. Now, doesn't that seem reasonable?
#12 of 90
Ridgeline disel displacement by blufz1
Jul 05, 2007 (6:37 pm)
Reply
I'll vote for 3.0 on diesel displacement for 2009. What do you think?
#13 of 90
Re: Ridgeline disel displacement [blufz1] by rsholland
Jul 06, 2007 (4:55 am)
Reply

Replying to: blufz1 (Jul 05, 2007 6:37 pm)

Certainly no smaller than that. My guess is in the 3.5L range.
 
Bob
#14 of 90
Re: Ridgeline disel displacement [rsholland] by blufz1
Jul 06, 2007 (8:11 am)
Reply

Replying to: rsholland (Jul 06, 2007 4:55 am)

Should be interesting. At 3.0 L it would have over 325 ft pounds of torque and maybe 25/30 mpg. I see the R as a light duty/economy truck not a body on frame 9000 lb capacity work truck. They could add maybe 50,000 to annual sales.
#15 of 90
Re: Ridgeline disel displacement [blufz1] by rsholland
Jul 11, 2007 (8:09 am)
Reply

Replying to: blufz1 (Jul 06, 2007 8:11 am)

More info here.
 
http://blogs.edmunds.com/Straightline/3060
 
Bob
#16 of 90
Re: Ridgeline disel displacement [blufz1] by moparbad
Jul 11, 2007 (11:30 am)
Reply

Replying to: blufz1 (Jul 05, 2007 6:37 pm)

blufz1I'll vote for 3.0 on diesel displacement for 2009. What do you think?
 
3.5L and 2010 or later.
#17 of 90
Re: Ridgeline disel displacement [moparbad] by blufz1
Jul 11, 2007 (12:11 pm)
Reply

Replying to: moparbad (Jul 11, 2007 11:30 am)

3.0 seems more like Honda. They want to continue the economy theme and 3.0 would have more torque than all the small V8 gassers.

Messages Page 2 of 10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
10
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement