Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Pickups Honda Ridgeline 2009 Honda Ridgeline
90 messages, Last post on Sep 13, 2009 at 10:41 AM
You are in the Honda Ridgeline Forum. Your Host is kcram
|
Replying to: aspesisteve (Apr 23, 2008 12:36 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: aspesisteve (Apr 23, 2008 12:36 pm) it won't save you anything at the pump in cost per gallon that's for sure. Less fuel use. Much better drivability with low RPM power (torque). Increased longevity/durability. Increased driving range and fewer fill ups required. At 25% greater efficiency the diesel does save money when comparing $3.50 gas to $4.00 diesel, however, it is not just about saving money, it is about having a choice of what some believe is a superior engine and having choices.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: moparbad (Apr 27, 2008 3:01 pm) I do understand the part about diesel engines getting better mpg. Are you saying they have better performance than the current gas engine in the Ridgeline?
|
|
|
Replying to: aspesisteve (Apr 28, 2008 7:21 am) As an example (although not apples to apples with the Ridgeline), my 2005 Ram 3500 offered 2 engines: a 330 hp 5.7L Hemi V8, and a 325 hp 5.9L Cummins turbodiesel straight six. A 5 hp difference shouldn't mean much, right? The Hemi's hp peak is at 4800 rpm; the Cummins at 2900. Now let's check the torque... the Hemi is 375 lb-ft  4200 rpm, the Cummins is 610 lb-ft 1500 rpm. Guess which truck comes off the line faster. kcram - Pickups Host |
|
| Is a hybrid "Ridgeline" modelled after the early ninties Ford Ranger PU..., size, weight, etc. | |
|
Replying to: wwest (Apr 18, 2008 9:09 am) Here are a few links stating that: http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061205/FREE/61204019/1024/c- - ara_submit http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/04/honda-may-outfit-ridgeline-and-others-with-v6- - -diesel/ http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-to-make-diesel-v6-for-us-by-10.html As to the diesel having too much torque: I'm sure Honda will engineer it properly to handle the increased torque. Bob
|
|
|
Replying to: rsholland (Jun 07, 2008 6:56 am) Yes, I think that "engineering" might well consist of simply substituting a 4 cylinder diesel instead of a 6 cylinder.
|
|
|
Replying to: wwest (Jun 07, 2008 10:08 am) Don't bet on it. Bob
|
|
|
Replying to: rsholland (Jun 07, 2008 7:12 pm) Maybe my dream, a Ford Ranger "sized" Ridgeline with Miller cycle smallish I4 using a lightweight/low inertia carbon fiber positive displacement engine belt driven variable speed SuperCharger will happen after all.
|
|
|
Replying to: wwest (Jun 08, 2008 5:56 pm) Sure, I suppose a 4-cylinder diesel is possible, but it's highly unlikely. I also don't expect a smaller Gen-2 Ridgeline as you mentioned. I could see Honda offering another smaller pickup model, maybe something based off the Element (beefed up considerably), but not a smaller Ridgeline; and that certainly could have a 4-cylinder diesel. If anything, I would hope to see more body styles offered on the next generation Ridgeline, one being a regular cab model with an 8' bed. With fuel prices the way they are there's a HUGE opportunity for the smaller mid-size trucks to become to become the "next 1/2-tons," and Honda is in a perfect position to cash in on this. The need for a work-friendly truck will not disappear with high fuel prices. The Ridgeline, unlike any other mid-size truck, is already wide enough to handle 4' wide plywood flat on the bed floor. What's missing is a bed long enough to carry plywood with the tailgate closed. If Honda's smart they will offer something like that. Bob
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Pickups Honda Ridgeline 2009 Honda Ridgeline
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Honda Ridgeline
2011 Toyota Tacoma
2010 Nissan Frontier
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
