You are here:
Forums
SUVs
Mazda CX-7
Outlander vs CX-7 vs Tribeca

263 messages, Last post on Sep 19, 2007 at 7:05 AM
You are in the Mazda CX-7 Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
|
Replying to: ateixeira (Sep 18, 2007 9:36 am) If you judge by the owners’ posts on various Outlander forums, I think it's safe to say that over 90% of the Outlander owners are indeed happy with their cars so far. There were very few minor problems with the car for its first year in North America and Mitsubishi was very quick in addressing them. What's not to be happy about? Of course, it's still too early to rate its long-term reliability, but so far so good. Fingers crossed. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: ateixeira (Sep 18, 2007 9:36 am) I would consider an event as gambling, when I have one chance for unfortunate event out of two, or in some cases out of 100 or so. The possibility of my car being totaled is based on very large assumption of yours and would not qualify as gambling. I mean do you consider driving as gambling? If your car would be totaled, quite likely you would not even know about it, or at least your would not care about a difference in your car "insurance payout". Fight for you life will be the only a fixation on your mind
|
|
|
Replying to: chelentano (Sep 18, 2007 10:22 am) Any how, I agree that a purchase choice should be made primarily on the merits of a test drive, and a personal evaluation. Never mind what the reviews say. After all, do you recall Time magazine's review of Titanic? They called it "Dead in the Water".
|
|
|
Replying to: ateixeira (Sep 17, 2007 1:31 pm) Transmission gearing also has a say in how many MPG's you get. Toyota has figured out a happy median between performance and just cruising. Most Toyota drivers do not drive as aggressive as say a Mazda buyer, so, Toyota can focus more on economy, rather then performance their main priority. Mazda is notorious for having higher gearing at higher speed which effects it's highway MPG's. The benefit is your engine is ready to push, which fits the "zoom-zoom" way of building a car. My Mazda6 2.3L is turning almost 3,500 rpm's at 70 mph and I get 30mpg's. If the engine was turning 3,000 rpm's at that speed, I bet you I would get 32-34 mpg's. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: ateixeira (Sep 18, 2007 12:26 pm) "I think there is a world market for about 5 computers" - Thomas Watson (Chairman of IBM), 1943 640k ought to be enough for everyone" - Bill Gates on computer memory, 1981 ...and finally about cars: "With over 50 foreign cars already on sale here, the Japanese auto industry isn't like to carve out a big slice of the US market" - Business Week, 1968
|
|
|
Replying to: chelentano (Sep 18, 2007 1:34 pm) Critics will be critics. Often I feel they want to be seen as fiercely independent so they'll be overly critical of a car. A good example is Jeremy Clarkson, he's hyper-critical in an attempt to be funny, but some times it just comes off as mean. |
|
You are here:
Forums
SUVs
Mazda CX-7
Outlander vs CX-7 vs Tribeca
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Mazda CX-7
2010 Mitsubishi Outlander
2007 Subaru B9 Tribeca



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats