Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
SUVs Mazda CX-7 Outlander vs CX-7 vs Tribeca
263 messages, Last post on Sep 19, 2007 at 7:05 AM
You are in the Mazda CX-7 Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
|
Replying to: ateixeira (Sep 14, 2007 11:40 am) Or the back end unless you are into big booty.
|
|
|
Replying to: maltb (Sep 14, 2007 1:00 pm)  He'd like it: 
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: ateixeira (Sep 14, 2007 11:40 am) But everything else was better with the Outlander...exterior styling, interior styling, Nav, stereo, 6 speed, warranty, price. The Outlander has enough power to satisfy my needs, so I chose it over the RAV4. |
|
|
Replying to: ateixeira (Sep 14, 2007 11:40 am) I could not agree with you more. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: ateixeira (Sep 14, 2007 11:40 am) 2 feet will make a big difference in an average Joe's collision
|
|
|
Replying to: chelentano (Sep 14, 2007 6:40 pm) It might affect safety is the stopping distances were a lot longer, but a 2ft variance is probably within the margin of error for that test, i.e. not a significant difference. |
|
|
Replying to: ateixeira (Sep 14, 2007 11:40 am) |
|
|
Replying to: dodo2 (Sep 17, 2007 11:06 am) Granted the swing gate can be a detriment, but you compensate for it and learn to live with it. I'll tell ya, I kind of appreciated the fact that the spare was mounted on the gate. Came in handy one cold dark stormy night when I had to change a flat. That sucker was real easy to dismount! Now, it's undergone a pretty good styling overhaul and it looks a lot better than the 2004! The only reason I didn't buy the new RAV4 was I think the styling of the CX-7 is a whole lot better! Vince. |
|
|
Replying to: dodo2 (Sep 17, 2007 11:06 am) Test driver hops in, steps on the gas, "Wow, this thing is peppy". It makes you overlook the cheap-ish interior. Then they look at the price tag, and the MPG is on the same sticker. So they might justify paying a bit more telling themselves they'll make it up on gas mileage (they will make up a small amount compared to other V6s). You might say Toyota spent the money where it counts, or at least where the consumer would first notice it. I have the 2GR engine in my Sienna, and I have to say, the engine is a gem. 266hp makes even this two-ton van feel fast, and I got 30.6mpg on two differnet road trips. So my minivan did better than my MIATA did on the same trip, holy cow! 
|
|
You are here:
Forums
SUVs Mazda CX-7 Outlander vs CX-7 vs Tribeca
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Mazda CX-7
2010 Mitsubishi Outlander
2007 Subaru B9 Tribeca
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
