Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
SUVs Mazda CX-7 Outlander vs CX-7 vs Tribeca
263 messages, Last post on Sep 19, 2007 at 7:05 AM
You are in the Mazda CX-7 Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
|
|
|---|---|
|
I've been reading reviews. But I have not made my mind yet, and I've already test-drove them... I think I'll buy the CX-7 but I'm still not sure, perhaps I'm in love with the looks... The Outlander is great too. And I also have in mind the Subaru Tribeca... (Is the Tribeca worth the extra money? I have the money, but I believe I do not get as much for each dollar). What would you recommend? Why? Thanks in advance! |
|
|
|
|
Forgot to mention. I'm looking for a reliable SUV/CUV that has amenities, technology, luxury and handles really well. I want a quick response from the engines too. I do not mind if the third row is small, or if the handles make noises. Also I really do not mind if it doesn't handle ok in snow, since It never snows here. Regards, Rob Note: English is not my first language, I apologize for any mistakes in any way.
|
|
|
Replying to: medellinrob (Jun 14, 2007 11:08 pm)  For the money I got a lot in the way of my CX-7; stability control; standard! Traction control; Standard! Zoom Zoom... priceless!  There are more "refined" interiors on the market, but none do it as well as the CX-7 for the price. Plus I've had mine for an entire year, June 8th, and I still don't have any creaks or rattles from my panels or doors. The downside of the CX-7 is the tires that came with mine, at 24k miles I had to switch to another brand entirely. The Yokohamas are much better for this car than the Bridgestones that came with it. {IMHO}  Good luck and welcome to the forum!
|
|
|
Replying to: medellinrob (Jun 14, 2007 11:01 pm) As to whether it's worth the extra money? You'll need to drive them all and then decide for yourself if the 'Beca is worth it. I think it is. I much prefer the full-time AWD that the Subie has over the on-demand systems of the CX7 and Outlander. One more point. In many ways the Tribeca is more of a competitor for the larger CX9, and not the smaller CX7. Bob
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: medellinrob (Jun 14, 2007 11:08 pm) Reliable? Outlander is listed by Consumer reports among most reliable SUVs, but CX-7 and Tribeca are not there: CR Best and Worst Why? May be, cose is build entirely in Japan and has warranty much better vs. Mazda. Also check out reliability and quality ratings by real owners here at Edmunds.com. Outlander owners are still more satisfied: Mazda CX-7 Consumer Rating 8.9 Mitsubishi Outlander Consumer Rating 9.2 Subaru B9 Tribeca Consumer Rating 8.8 Amenities, technology? Outlander beats in this department most of the SUVs priced up to $40K. Just check this comparison, it's Outlander vs. RAV4, but CX and Tribeca would not do any better against Outlander: comaprison Handling? I believe Outlander and CX-7 have better handling over Subaru. Engine? Outlander's V6 has plenty of horse power (220 hp) for it's size, which is, for instance, more even then Mercedes ML320 SUV (215 hp), while it weights much less.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: rsholland (Jun 15, 2007 3:30 pm) As for AWD, Outlander does have the full-time "AWD Lock" mode, which could be switched back to "AWD Auto" mode for better fuel economy: it's great to have this choice and flexibility! Also Mitsubishi known as a great off-road brand, winning 12 Dakar rallies! Subaru could not make even one win. |
|
|
Replying to: chelentano (Jun 16, 2007 12:29 am) And talking about the Dakar, the 07 Outlander is the direct descendant of the Pajero Evo 2+2 Concept. The same concept where the current Dakar champion Pajero MPR13 was derived from. From a glance you can see right away that the Pajero Evo MPR13 looks strikingly similar to the Outlander rather than the production Pajero/Montero. Yeah, 12 wins, 7 of those in a row, there's no mistaking about quality of engineering, technology, and reliability.
|
|
|
http://www.mitsucars.com/MMNA/jsp/outlander/07/compare.do?loc=en-us Unfortunately the '08 Tribeca info wasn't available, so you see the '07 info here. Also, this is for top trim models, not base models. Keep in mind the "spec sheet war" is only part of the story. Bottom line is you need to drive each model you're considering. What you get via "seat-of-the-pants" is often far more telling. I would also drive each model several times, with several days inbetween, so as to let the experience set in. That also gives you the opportunity to check or re-check some features that you're unsure of. I would go to different dealers to do this, as that will also let you get a sense of what each dealer is like. Bob
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: rcpax (Jun 16, 2007 1:27 am) Dakar Rally video
|
|
You are here:
Forums
SUVs Mazda CX-7 Outlander vs CX-7 vs Tribeca
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Mazda CX-7
2010 Mitsubishi Outlander
2007 Subaru B9 Tribeca
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
