Article Comments - 2007 Honda Fit Sport vs. 2008 Scion xD

37 messages, Last post on Jun 19, 2008 at 2:39 PM

You are in the Honda Fit Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Honda Fit, Scion xD, Car Comparisons, Hatchback

Article comments for Comparison Test: 2007 Honda Fit Sport vs. 2008 Scion xD - The Honda Fit and the Scion xD rest on nearly identical wheelbases, some 96.5 inches for the Honda and 96.9 inches for the Scion. Their other dimensions are also nearly the same, with the Fit measuring 2.7 inches longer while the Scion spreads 1.7 inches wider. These cars are both 60.0 inches tall. (more)

Outline

Messages Page 2 of 4: 1; 2; 3; 4; Prev; Next; Last

#8 of 37 Re: cargo space behind the 2nd row [bobw3] by bennetpullen Jun 13, 2007 (2:43 pm)
Replying to: bobw3 (Jun 13, 2007 8:55 am) Yeah bobw3, the article doesn't show those figires but behind the 2nd row the xD has 10.5 cu ft and the Fit has 21.3 cu ft! I find it interesting that they show a photo of the back of the Fit with the hatch and seats up, but there is no photo of the xD in that configuration.
#9 of 37 The Fit was the long-termer by bennetpullen Jun 13, 2007 (2:56 pm)
They only said so in the fine print of the article but the Fit they used was the Edmunds long-term Fit with over 12,000 miles on it. I'm sure this hurt it in the performance testing against the brand new tires on the xD. I find it interesting that the Fit got a 63.3 mph score in the slalom in the comparo but it got a 67.5! in the its full test. In the Fit full test they said "the shifter is awesome" but in the comparo they said it felt "loose/worn/tired". I think it was kind of lame, the xD seems like a very nice car (I really liked the xA as well) but they way I look at it the xD is bigger on the outside but smaller on the inside, isn't as fun to drive, gets worse gas mileage, is more expensive and despite having a faster 0-60 it is slower 0-30 and they are virtually even 0-45. Replies to this message: sebastien (Jun 16, 2007 7:07 am)
#10 of 37 Re: Honda Fit vs. Scion xD Real World MPG [orbit9090] by actualsize Jun 15, 2007 (6:21 am)
Replying to: orbit9090 (Jun 13, 2007 4:09 am) The Fit had some 12k miles on it. You could say that it's motor was thoroughly broken-in. The xD, on the other hand, was brand new, with about 450 miles on it. I would expect the gap to narrow somewhat with time. With regard to the shifter/degradation issue, I'll repeat what I posted in the Staightline thread: I shied away from commemting on the Fit's shifter in the text of the article, partly because of the mileage issue. The comments you see on the specs page are the raw, uneditied feedback from the test driver who did the track testing. When the Fit finishes its long-term test, we'll address any degradation issues at that time. As for the Fit vs xD handling results, remember that these cars were track tested on the same day at the same track by the same driver.
#12 of 37 Re: The Fit was the long-termer [bennetpullen] by sebastien Jun 16, 2007 (7:07 am)
Replying to: bennetpullen (Jun 13, 2007 2:56 pm) Noticed it too. That's a 5mph difference ! They also mentionnend it didn't sacrifice comfort, providing "a pleasing, comfortable ride". Strange...
#13 of 37 not to mention by eldaino Aug 28, 2007 (7:22 am)
that while having a blunt nose makes you look 'substansial' it certainly wont win you any beauty awards. there is no real sexy car in this segment, but the fit is not boring, and is defintely better looking than the scion. again, i'm pissed that its sporting merits where downplayed....i think some edmunds staff DOES have it out for honda....remember the civic vs. mazda 3? a 7mpg advantage and softer ride on the civic didn't matter; because the 3 was just SOOO sporty. now suddenly cushiness and lower mpgs mean the world? wtf?!! consistency people! Replies to this message: macsan (Dec 21, 2007 8:08 pm)
#14 of 37 2009 Honda Fit......... Look it up! by jhartsock81 Sep 27, 2007 (8:48 am)
I'm a proud owner of a 2007 Honda Fit, I admit its little lacking in power. But it seems there are many of aftermarket upgrades. Seem to solve the "few" complaints about the current Fit. But I stumbled across this... 2009 US Honda Fit . The Honda fit has been out in Japan since 2001 or so. And It seems its going to get a all around face lift. Looks like HONDA is improving the already superior FIT. Toyota/Scion will once again be in the dust of HONDA. But on this segment, I noticed the MAJOR down play on the Fit and its strong features. I also noticed if you read the fine print at the bottom of the article, Edmunds had to purchase the Fit Sport, but Scion provided a test xD. Talk about lining the pockets for a better result!!!!
#15 of 37 What is it about the Fit Sport? by na_hosoi Nov 24, 2007 (2:37 pm)
There are only two versions of the Fit. Base and Sport. The cars are identical. The only differences are aesthetic: ground effects and spoiler, alloy wheels/tires and some comical interior options. (The same am/fm/cd unit [w/wo mp3 capability], paddle shifters [109 hp paddle shifting what?!?], and an AUX audio input [i.e.$200 ipod cable]) Anyone buying a fit with value in mind would pass on the sport. In that case, the Scion is a waste of money. What's more, the Fit's interior in WAY classy. Very nicely done. The XD interior is clumsy and juvenile. In terms of design/ dashboard layout, economy of space was badly disrespected as a concept. I'm happy to drive the Fit. Literally. I get in the car and it's a joy to turn it on, to look at (inside and out), to be seen in and to operate. It's important to me that everything come together. Not just performance, or aesthetics, but everything. I bought my fit at 14,580 from Findlay Honda. Replies to this message: nthomas (Nov 27, 2007 1:13 pm) zombietom3 (Nov 27, 2007 9:42 pm) eldaino (Feb 06, 2008 7:46 am)
#16 of 37 Re: What is it about the Fit Sport? [na_hosoi] by nthomas Nov 27, 2007 (1:13 pm)
Replying to: na_hosoi (Nov 24, 2007 2:37 pm) In addition to the differences you noted in your post, there a few more differences between the Sport and the Base model that you didn't mention: • The stereos are different. The base has a 160 watt 4-speaker system. The Sport has a 200 watt 6-speaker system. • The Sport has cruise control; the base does not. You ask "What is it about the Fit Sport?" I wanted an economical car that I felt was attractive, and that had the options I needed (yes, the cruise control and AUX input are important to me). I think the Sport looks better than the base model - and I use my paddle shifters all the time Therefore, the Sport was the best choice for me. I could have been ok with the base model, but the higher price was worth it to me. Replies to this message: zombietom3 (Nov 27, 2007 9:42 pm)
#17 of 37 Re: What is it about the Fit Sport? [nthomas] by zombietom3 Nov 27, 2007 (9:42 pm)
Replying to: nthomas (Nov 27, 2007 1:13 pm) If I were to buy a Fit, there's no question that I would pay the difference as well. Economy matters to me, but not at the expense of hating the car I drive every day. Driving may often be a chore, but it can be made more or less pleasant by the choice of vehicle. Nevertheless, I can see that some would choose the more austere model and be satisfied in a different way.