Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
SUVs Mitsubishi Outlander Getting a new Outlander, CR-V or RAV4
121 messages, Last post on Aug 26, 2009 at 7:49 PM
You are in the Mitsubishi Outlander Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
|
Replying to: sir_timbit (Jul 19, 2009 6:51 pm) But if all things equals, even just the warranty will seal the deal for the Outlander. If you consider the pros and cons, the Outlander is more car for your money than the RAV-4. I have heard of talks that Mitsubishi will close shop and leave the North American market, I have heard of such talks since ages ago. But look at the US now, it was GM and Chrysler filing for bankruptcy, not Mitsubishi. This is their company press release: http://www.mitsubishicars.com/MMNA/jsp/company/commitment.do |
|
|
Replying to: sir_timbit (Jul 19, 2009 6:51 pm) Also, if you will keep the vehicle for several years, you might find the difference in resale to not be that significant. Or it might even work against you. When I bought my '99 Galant, a comparable Camry was running around $3K more. After 10 years, using KBB the Camry is worth $2K more than my Galant (similar equipment, mileage, zip code). So that higher Toyota resale actually would have cost me $1000. Regarding noise, I agree the Outlander's interior noise is more than I would prefer. Still, as you're in Canada, the heated seats might be worth it as a tradeoff for higher noise. Other considerations: Do both engines use timing chains (good for life of the engine) or belts (need to be replaced every 60K miles or so)? Are there other maintenance considerations that would make one more expensive than the other? Is one drastically more expensive to insure? Have fun with your test drive and be sure to let us know how it goes!
|
|
|
Replying to: fushigi (Jul 21, 2009 3:38 pm) The 6 cyl timing belt is good for 105K/84 months(7 yrs), whichever first BTW. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitsubishi_4B1_engine#Specifications_4 Needing towing power, I opted for the 6 cylinder and have been very pleased . The 6 speed tranny is smooth and I've gotten as much as 28MPG on the highway (usually around 20 around town and 25+ on highway with my 4WD LS model.) While I haven't driven a CVT, the concept sounds a bit weird to me (keep the engine revving and vary the coupling, Sounds like it would be noisier) |
|
|
I'm in the market for a Outlander SE fwd.I've received quotes from dealers for 26K, does this sound right. I thought the prices should be around 21 or 22K. What has been the experience of everyone during your buying experience.
|
|
|
Replying to: bolt22 (Jul 28, 2009 6:12 pm) An SE as I would equipment it (F5, G4, FW, F6, GQ, GL, GS, and GD) has a TMV of $24079 after that same $1K rebate. Is your price an out-the-door price (includes sales tax & all fees)? |
|
|
|
Considering both. Any opinions appreciated. I'm worried about the seats in the CRV being comfortable on long trips. I've seen some comments on MSN Autos, Edmunds, KBB where the owners complain about seat comfort. Thanks in advance!
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: thomasw98 (Jun 18, 2008 10:19 am) |
|
|
Replying to: brown99 (Jun 10, 2007 10:01 pm) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: chuckfromli (Aug 09, 2009 4:03 pm) I had the same concerns, and test drove a EX-L and EX a couple times before I decided I could live with hte cloth. After a week of driving, they seem more comfortable every time I get in. On msot car, my left leg gest sore after an hour. Not the case with the CRV. The side bolsters are excellent. Might be narrow for a "wider" person.... but fits really nice if you have a <36" waist. I don't like the RAV4 interior. It's too busy. They are trying too hard to make lower quality materials look interesting. Otherwise, the RAV 4 has more power than the CRV and quaity and reliability is very good. I've found the brakes on most Toyotas to be marginal. Not much feel and when loaded with passengers and luggage, they take a LOT of force ot stop the car with a newer Camry I drove. The brakes and handling of the CR-V are what put it on top over the others. The Nissan Rogue was a close second, but visibility is poor and the back seat and cargo space is small. It's a little expensive for what you get. AS for Mitsubishi? Well, the dealer network is pretty sparse outside of major cities and even then, you may be limited to 1 or 2 dealers. Not good for a car with average to below average quality (they used to and still do share a lot of Chrysler parts). CVT's and 4 cylinders can be a good combo IF, big IF, the engine is very torquey so it doesn't need ot rev like crazy. The Rogue is marginal... and that's a very storong 4 cylinder. I'd expect the Outland 4 cyliner ot be almsot as buzzy as the Compass or Patriot.
|
|
|
Replying to: motoguy128 (Aug 19, 2009 10:11 am) Wow, did you do any research before posting your opinion on Mitsubishi, or it is just your expert opinion? We have about 20 Mitsubishi dealerships in Chicago metro area, if I can call it a major city. Ten years/100K powertrain warranty, and 5 years road assistance should help, if ever needed. As far as quality (which is one of the the highest in its class for Outlander by the way), this car is 100% build in Japan with 0% association with Chrysler or any of it's parts. It would be nice, if you could voice your opinion after reading any reviews, test driving the car, or actually talking with any real owners. Otherwise, enjoy your girly over hyped, owerpriced and underpowered She-R-V.
|
|
You are here:
Forums
SUVs Mitsubishi Outlander Getting a new Outlander, CR-V or RAV4
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2011 Toyota RAV4
2010 Honda CR-V
2010 Mitsubishi Outlander
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
