You are here:
Forums
SUVs
Acura MDX
Acura MDX v. Honda Pilot

50 messages, Last post on Jul 06, 2009 at 7:24 AM
You are in the Acura MDX Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
|
|
|---|---|
|
Replying to: chrism124 (Feb 06, 2008 12:45 pm) But I think the point of all this, is that with only a couple hundred dollars a year difference, it needn't be a major deciding factor in which vehicle to get. |
|
|
Replying to: chrism124 (Feb 06, 2008 12:45 pm) |
|
|
Thanks to everyone for their thoughts. I ended up purchasing a 2008 Pilot due to the dealer incentives Honda is throwing around. I got a EX-L w/NAV for under $28k + TTL, which was about $2k cheaper than I could get a 2006 MDX w/NAV with 22k miles (that was also located 3 hours away). The price difference convinced me to live with the following Pilot shortcomings vs the 2006 MDX (some of which have already been mentioned above): 1) No power adjustable passenger front seat; no memory seating for driver's seat (which doesn't matter much to me because both my wife and I keep the seat as far back as it will go) 2) Fan speed for second row of car linked to front zone (MDX has independent fan speed control; Pilot only has independent temp. control) 3) No hands-free cell phone capability (not even offered as a Honda accessory, but as an after-market accessory by the dealer for an excessive price) I'm sure there are others, but those are the ones that I noticed right away during our test drive. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: scottm123 (Feb 06, 2008 5:46 am) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: love2driveinct (Jan 13, 2008 11:12 am)
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: rtchambers (May 08, 2008 8:12 pm) Any advice on how to choose would be greatly appreciated. I'm particularly curious whether others who have compared the 2009 Touring version of the Pilot to the MDX also have felt like the difference is not as vast as it once was between the Pilot and the MDX. |
|
|
Replying to: benandeleanor (Jul 06, 2008 5:53 pm) Of course, all that being said, the MDX is still our first choice due to the superior handling characteristics and extra power (we live in Colorado and the high altitude saps engine power like nobody's business). Hope this helps. |
|
|
Replying to: benandeleanor (Jul 06, 2008 5:53 pm) Pilot gets about 10% better MPG, and does not have to use the Premium gas - which here is about 15 cents per gallon... However, am still disappointed in the looks of 09 Pilot. I was hoping for something more stylish? Less Boxy...sort of the way Honda re-designed the CRV. I did test drive the Pilot and it was great. I think if the MDX was a bit smaller and got better Mileage than the Pilot...I would still probably go w. it..I love the interior of the MDX, the "cockpit" feel. ...I also am not 100% sure I like the looks of the MDX either. I don't appreciate driving enough to judge the MDX feel vs. the Pilot. Seems like the experts rave about how great it drives compared to other SUVs.
|
|
|
Replying to: comet123 (Jul 06, 2008 6:31 pm) Some observations: 1. Honda and Acura's navigations should be identical, so no difference there. 2. The Pilot's 3rd row is definitely more user-friendly, and a knock on the MDX is the fact that you can only access the 3rd row on the right side. Also the 2nd row does not adjust positions. These were points to consider but not ultimately important ones in my decision as I hardly use my 3rd row (in fact they are usually folded down), but it is there if I need to take a 6th person somewhere. The backseats for the MDX are very comfortable if you are carrying 4 adults. 3. It's subjective of course, but I think the MDX looks a million times better than the Pilot from any angle, especially the front and rear. 4. For those with children, MDX has 3 LATCH connectors all in the 2nd row (probably can only use 2 at a time) whereas the Pilot has 4 LATCH connectors, I believe 2 in each rear row. I would have preferred the 4 LATCH's but personally for me it was not a huge deal as my family won't warrant that many LATCH's for a few years anyway and by then it will be time to replace my wife's car. 5. I get 19-20 MPG on the MDX mixed driving and 23 MPG on the highway. I imagine the Pilot won't get much better, maybe by 1 MPG. Premium gas is 10-15 cents more expensive per gallon than regular, but as an annual estimation it's probably just $200 more per year in gas, which shouldn't be a big deal if you're shopping for an SUV in the $38,000+ range anyway. 6. Last I checked, the Pilot was going for MSRP or maybe $500-1,000 off MSRP (not sure if this has changed as the Pilot has been out for a little bit longer now). The MDX now has a $2,500 dealer incentive if you purchase or $1,500 if you take Honda's special financing. This should narrow the gap considerably as you can bargain off invoice for the MDX but have to bargain off MSRP for the Pilot. When I bought my MDX Tech in mid-June, a Touring Pilot would have cost me MSRP ($40k+) before tax, titles, and fees. I bought my MDX Tech for almost $2,000 below that before the extra fees. If anything I maybe gave up RES, rear bumper sensors (MDX Tech comes with a camera) and a USB iPod connection (rumor is this will be in the 2009 MDX's), but got HID lights, a better interior, and let's face it an Acura instead of a Honda. The MDX is only in its 2nd model year as well so it's not an old design. Anyway, just wanted to give my (probably biased) observations. Good luck with your decisions! Can't go wrong either way but I do love my MDX!
|
|
|
I don't see much activity on this comparing the MDX to the Pilot. I have driven both....and both seem great. Am leaning towards MDX..just because I already own a Honda van and don't have the need for the 3rd seat. If it was our only large vehicle and I needed extra room, definitely Pilot. |
|
You are here:
Forums
SUVs
Acura MDX
Acura MDX v. Honda Pilot
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2009 Acura MDX
2010 Honda Pilot



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats