Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
SUVs Acura MDX Acura MDX v. Honda Pilot
50 messages, Last post on Jul 06, 2009 at 7:24 AM
You are in the Acura MDX Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
|
Thanks for the input on the Pilot vs. used MDX. I'll probably make my decision in a couple of weeks. The premium fuel requirement of the MDX is certainly a negative from my perspective, but I may overlook it to get some of the little things that the MDX provides that the Honda Pilot does not (although I also wish the MDX had the Variable Cylinder Management that the 08 FWD Pilots have). If anyone else has any other thoughts, I would still appreciate them.
|
|
|
Replying to: dfwhonda (Feb 05, 2008 3:06 am)  I needed a vehicle in 2001 so I bought the MDX but I would have probably bought the Pilot....had it been available. Personal preference. The NAV system in my 2001 (made for Acura by Alpine) has paid for itself over the years.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: mecheng1 (Feb 05, 2008 11:12 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: love2driveinct (Feb 05, 2008 7:03 pm) I have a lead on a nice 2006 MDX in TX, and since this car isn't for me but for my wife, I think she will probably end up choosing the MDX for the luxuries it offers over the Pilot (as well as for the styling, which is still much better imho than the blocky Pilot). |
|
|
Replying to: love2driveinct (Jan 13, 2008 11:12 am) I did a lot of testing with the car and found that with 93 octane, we got approx 5-6 MPG better than when running 87 Octane. I tested this on my commute to work, which is the same route, same traffic.. everyday. The commute is about 70% Highway, 30% city I ran with 93 for a few months and with 87 for a few months. I tested this in the late Spring to be sure that winter fuel blends didn't get in the way. I suppose it depends on your commute and style of driving, but after doing the tests and calculating MPG by fuel in/miles out, we found that the MDX does better on the higher octane fuel. Yes, you spend more at the pump, but with the miles out being higher, you're actually saving money. |
|
|
Replying to: scottm123 (Feb 06, 2008 5:46 am) Perhaps using the lower octane does, as Scott has proven, prevent the engine from operating at it most efficient point, even at lower points on the power curve. Hence, owners manual's that recommend premium verses those that require premium. There are some compression ratios that require 93 Octane to prevent engine damage.
|
|
|
Replying to: mecheng1 (Feb 06, 2008 11:46 am) Personally speaking, if I can afford to buy or lease a new MDX, with an average price of $42k, paying the extra $210 per year for premium fuel shouldn’t be an issue. The extra cost would be less once the better gas mileage, with premium fuel, is factored. Just my .02. Regards, NHman
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: chrism124 (Feb 06, 2008 12:45 pm)  But I think the point of all this, is that with only a couple hundred dollars a year difference, it needn't be a major deciding factor in which vehicle to get. |
|
|
Replying to: chrism124 (Feb 06, 2008 12:45 pm) |
|
You are here:
Forums
SUVs Acura MDX Acura MDX v. Honda Pilot
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2009 Acura MDX
2010 Honda Pilot
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
