Sign In Join 



Article Comments - 2007 BMW 335i vs. 2007 Lexus IS 350

138 messages,  Last post on Dec 28, 2008 at 9:45 PM

You are in the BMW 3-Series Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? BMW 3 Series, Lexus IS 350, Sedan, Wagon

Article comments for Comparison Test: 2007 BMW 335i vs. 2007 Lexus IS 350 - When we matched these cars against each other in 2006, the newly redesigned 306-hp Lexus IS 350 ran away from the 255-hp BMW 330i with a quicker acceleration to 60 mph by more than a full second. On the other hand, that BMW outmaneuvered the Lexus in every objective and subjective handling category. (more)


Messages Page 11 of 14
1
...
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#99 of 138
Re: BMW quality [kdshapiro] by diablo_dude
Jun 17, 2007 (6:03 pm)
Reply

Replying to: kdshapiro (Jun 17, 2007 5:00 am)

http://www.jdpower.com/press-releases/pressrelease.aspx?id=2007088
 
You cannot predict the maintenance cycle of a car and you could always buy that lemon from any mfg but wouldn't you agree that law of averages favors some more than others based on consumer reports, etc.
 
Your last statement is philosophical and using that adage for every decision in life, realistically, be impractical.
#100 of 138
Re: BMW quality [diablo_dude] by kdshapiro
Jun 17, 2007 (6:50 pm)
Reply

Replying to: diablo_dude (Jun 17, 2007 6:03 pm)

"Your last statement is philosophical and using that adage for every decision in life, realistically, be impractical"
 
Thank you. JD Power couldn't have predicted this. bdkinnh, "BMW 5-Series Sedans" #11855, 6 Jun 2007 10:08 am How do you think he felt about buying a reliable car? I wouldn't expect to get a lemon from BMW any more than Lexus. You can't control it, so why worry about it? And even if you plan for it, it may not turn out to be all of that.
 
Of course it's philosophical. I don't worry about what I can't control. I only exert effort into what I can control.
 
Just as a postscript the IQS doesn't really say anything. Although I'm sure there are people out there who drive a lemon off the lot, I've never had any critical non-scheduled maintenance during the first 90 days for the last many years.
#101 of 138
Re: BMW quality [diablo_dude] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Jun 17, 2007 (6:54 pm)
Reply

Replying to: diablo_dude (Jun 17, 2007 6:03 pm)

If reliability were the only criteria for purchases of cars, then sales and reliability charts would be exactly parallel---but they are far from it. It seems that "nearly/almost as good" is more than enough for most people if they find a car exciting or well-styled or fun to drive. Car purchases are extremely emotional decisions, more allied to fashion, dreams and hands-on experience than to dental work.
 
In other words barring totally negative publicity or a shockingly dissimilar set of reliability statistics, people don't much care what JD Powers says about frequency of complaints if it's a choice between 103 problems per 100 cars or 107 problems per 100 cars....even if that makes the 103 car No. 1 and the 107 car No.6 on the list.
 
It's just too abstract to matter.
 
If the BMW burst into flames during the test, or had to be flat-bedded off the track, or if 60 minutes did an expose, THAT would matter.
 
Visiting Host
(owns a Toyota)
#102 of 138
Re: BMW quality [Mr_Shiftright] by diablo_dude
Jun 17, 2007 (8:13 pm)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Jun 17, 2007 6:54 pm)

Sorry, since this seems to be going off into a tangent a bit.
 
Car buying is definitely an emotional buy for many, including myself. As mentioned my 328i continues to have problems almost every few months which translates to $500 to almost $1K every visit. So heck yea, I am fed up with maintaining this car and my reason to buy Lexus was from OVERALL opinions and experiences from friends, reading writeups (like JD powers and Edmunds).
 
You mention, "If reliability were the only criteria for purchases of cars, then sales and reliability charts would be exactly parallel---but they are far from it.". How do you explain the decline of US car mfg such as GM as the dominant car mfg in the industry to Toyota? If car mfg's reliability consistently declines over time, in my opinion, it does matter and in the end consumers respond accordingly. I think it would be economic suicide in a competitive market for automakers to think that they can rest on their laurels and think "loyal" customers will continue to be loyal while product quality declines.
#103 of 138
Re: BMW quality [kdshapiro] by diablo_dude
Jun 17, 2007 (8:42 pm)
Reply

Replying to: kdshapiro (Jun 17, 2007 6:50 pm)

I never said my 328i was a lemon but over the past couple years, the frequency and severity of the problems seem to be increasing which translates to what I consider high repair costs each and every time. Now if you tell me that this is normal and should be expected then it was my mistake to buy the car since at the time of purchase, my biggest draw to BMW was reliability over time (as long as it is maintained properly) and handling. This is why I paid the premium to buy BMW vs other mfg. You and I can bring up other posts of people with problems from the respective car mfgs but again my recent decision was from MY personal experience along with reading recent studies on OVERALL reliability. So my decision was, on average, what would be my chances of having issues while also getting the performance and handling.
 
While I cannot ultimately control if the car I buy will have problems immediately or later down the road, I can better my chances through personal experience, recent studies on reliability, etc.
#104 of 138
Re: BMW quality [diablo_dude] by circlew
Jun 18, 2007 (3:40 am)
Reply

Replying to: diablo_dude (Jun 17, 2007 5:51 pm)

Well if that's your philosophy in everything you do then you should go out and empty your savings, get a huge loan and buy the most expensive vehicle because as you say......life is too short.
 
If you worry, you die early! My point is to do the research and feel good about your choice. If you have problems with your choice, worrying about will not do you any good.
 
Quality is a given in ANYTHING you buy. What one perceives is better than the rest will sway the final choice but it does not guarantee trouble-free ownership.
 
Yes, I plan to get one of the most expensive vehicle with all the high tech they can jam in...and dump it after the warranty is up!
 
Regards,
OW
#105 of 138
Re: BMW quality [circlew] by habitat1
Jun 18, 2007 (4:26 am)
Reply

Replying to: circlew (Jun 18, 2007 3:40 am)

"Yes, I plan to get one of the most expensive vehicle with all the high tech they can jam in...and dump it after the warranty is up!"
 
I know you are at least partially joking. But I still look back on my decision to go for a minimaly optioned, but high build quality, 1995 Nissan Maxima in 1994 as perhaps the best automotive decision of my life. The 10+ years of daily driving use it gave me (and 3 years of limited use since) totalling 155k miles has been much appreciated. My total service and repairs over that time were minimal, by today's standards. The 1995 Maxima cost $21,000 new and is worth about $4,500 today (standing offer from Nissan service manager). That's about $110 per month in depreciation, or a little over 10 cents a mile. That frugalness made me feel far less guilty for splurging on a 911, when the time came. The amount of money many of my peers spent cycling through 2,3,4+ ELLPS and LPS over the 13 years that I've had a lowly Maxima would be enough to pay for a 911 of their own.
 
While I would not advocate an IS350 over a 335i purely upon reliability predictions (they are dramatically different cars in my book), I can see where anticipated reliability is a factor worth consideration. And the idea of "dumping" a car after the warranty period is up probably means that, if the car isn't known for reliability, you will take a hit on that "dump". Certainly a bit more than $110 per month, even inflated to 2007 dollars.
#106 of 138
Re: BMW quality [diablo_dude] by kdshapiro
Jun 18, 2007 (4:43 am)
Reply

Replying to: diablo_dude (Jun 17, 2007 8:42 pm)

"You and I can bring up other posts of people with problems from the respective car mfgs but again my recent decision was from MY personal experience along with reading recent studies on OVERALL reliability"
 
I understand your point, and the disappointment in quality of your vehicle. You paid for a premium vehicle and expected one. The same is for the poster in the link I provided. He bought and paid for a premium vehicle and expected a premium ownership experience and didn't get one. Both of you are disappointed and all of the reliability studies in the world won't make you feel better.
 
"While I cannot ultimately control if the car I buy will have problems immediately or later down the road, I can better my chances through personal experience, recent studies on reliability, etc."
 
I think you understand my point a bit better about not worrying. There are two many variables you make your choice and move on.
#107 of 138
Re: BMW quality [kdshapiro] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Jun 18, 2007 (6:50 am)
Reply

Replying to: kdshapiro (Jun 18, 2007 4:43 am)

It's like the person who buys a car he doesn't like because it's "safer". And so he spends every day with no joy in order to survive a possible accident he may never have, or if he does, it may or may not affect the area or include the dynamics of the safety test he relied upon.
 
All I know from my and other people's personal experience is that even in 2007, a BMW seems to be more fun to drive than a Lexus.
 
I think that's what the editors were driving at here. After all, they are "enthusiasts" and they don't keep the cars for 5 years. It's their point of view based on what they are trying to accomplish in their work....part of which is conveying their impressions on to you.
 
Who could possibly judge or comment accurately upon the longterm reliability of a 2007 car?
 
Visiting Host
#108 of 138
Re: BMW quality [habitat1] by circlew
Jun 18, 2007 (7:08 am)
Reply

Replying to: habitat1 (Jun 18, 2007 4:26 am)

You got me! Yes, I was partially joking but considering the 335 vs. the IS350, the point I was making can be applied to these cars. Whether you load them up with options or not, the technical complexity, or state-of-the art in today's autos drives up cost of ownership that is difficult to compare pre-2000 levels. Another factor is that quality needs to catch up to that complexity each year which has to be challenging to say the least.
 
The value proposition is how much you want to pay for the "total package" when you buy or lease. Leasing is more costly because you always have a payment but less "worrisome" because you are constantly "recycling". The purchase option is cheaper if you keep it on the road with proper maintenance and least costs to repair.
 
Parts are parts at the end of the day and will ultimately fail. Some cars last longer (cost less) than others as you have an outstanding example in your 1995 Maxima, while I am sure others have dumped their problem cars at a relative loss.
 
In the case of these 2 examples, getting out of either after the warranty is up or staying in and making sure you extend coverage for major repairs are 2 choices that weigh more if purchased than if leased.
 
But to worry over such things as money or cars is not worth the impending stress/unhealth to the anatomy! One should be having fun like you are in the 911 or the Maxima!
 
Regards,
OW

Messages Page 11 of 14
1
...
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement