Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
SUVs Mazda CX-9 Mazda CX-9 Real World MPG
140 messages, Last post on Feb 13, 2009 at 11:14 AM
You are in the Mazda CX-9 Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
|
Replying to: jreddick (Mar 09, 2008 12:39 pm) It is also now more expensive to refine since it is cleaner. Even Katrina has an effect on diesel since many plants were shutdown when they came back on line they focused on producing standard petroleum. Couple low stocks with high demand for diesel and you have the ludicrous prices we see! I wish it wasn't that way because I would go for a diesel CX-9 in a heartbeat! |
|
|
Replying to: jreddick (Mar 09, 2008 12:39 pm) 15 percent drop from 22 MPG = 18.7 MPG 20 percent drop from 22 MPG = 17.6 MPG Driving habits probably account for the rest. So let's say somebody reports getting 15 MPG mixed mileage for a trip that is 60 highway/40 city. This is on par for city mileage, but it probably means that a heavy foot in town and an average highway speed of 75-80 MPH could easily account for the rest. Wet roads make a big difference since the wide tires have so much contact area, and driving in windy conditions or hilly terrain are obviously factors too.
|
|
|
Replying to: skw0123 (Mar 15, 2008 2:02 pm) "Wet roads make a big difference since the wide tires have so much contact area, " I live in a rainy neck of the woods and am wondering if I should go for 18"s if I buy a CX-9. TIA
|
|
|
Replying to: c_rex (Mar 15, 2008 10:48 pm) 20" wheel/tire combo is heavier than the 18" wheel/tire combo. That will cost you a bit of MPG (but way less than 1mpg) EPA testing of mighway mileage varies speeds around 48mph (2007 and before). If one holds constant speed (say using cruise control), one can definite beat EPA highway mileage even at 65mph. I don't know about the new 2008 rating system since it has been updated.
|
|
|
Replying to: ceric (Mar 15, 2008 11:50 pm) |
|
|
|
Our new CX 9 FWD; first tank averaged 18.9, mostly city miles. This is above the prediction by EPA, which was 18 combined. For a large SUV, over 5,000 pounds, we're very happy with our first tank results. I love this vehicle in all ways!! 
|
|
|
Replying to: dorenescar (Apr 14, 2008 10:11 pm) I have been getting 16.5 - 17.5mpg with mixed driving. And, I am not lead-footed, just following the flow. AWD is 5% heavier (200lb+) and more powertrain loss. -2mpg is expected. BTW, CX-9 FWD is only 4350lb (curb weight - meaning all fluid/fuel - no person). AWD is about 4550lb + extra accessories.. (hitch-30lb, roofrack-15lb, .....)
|
|
|
Replying to: ceric (Apr 14, 2008 11:02 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: maltb (Apr 15, 2008 10:27 am) I have a gut feeling that the difference in MPGs between FWD and AWD is more than 1 mpg. We should do a poll on this. My guess was 2mpg.
|
|
|
Replying to: ceric (Apr 15, 2008 2:37 pm) My current FWD averages about 17mpg with 50/50, but I tend to drive a little fast on the highway making the 22mpg figure unreachable. With any car, I typically average the city rating.
|
|
You are here:
Forums
SUVs Mazda CX-9 Mazda CX-9 Real World MPG
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Mazda CX-9
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
