Sign In Join 



Does America Even Need Its Own Automakers?

1788 messages,  Last post on Mar 03, 2009 at 2:18 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Automotive News, Truck, Sedan, SUV


Messages Page 171 of 179
1
...
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
...
179
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#1699 of 1788
Re: meanwhile, back at the ranch [anythngbutgm] by gagrice
Feb 27, 2009 (11:33 am)
Reply

Replying to: anythngbutgm (Feb 27, 2009 11:00 am)

I don't know. The guy that bought our ranch up in the back country loves his H3. He destroyed an Acura on the truck trail going up and back every day to work. Hummer may be all GM has to offer aside from the Corvette.
#1701 of 1788
Re: meanwhile, back at the ranch [gagrice] by steve_ HOST
Feb 27, 2009 (11:49 am)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Feb 27, 2009 11:33 am)

Perfect, we really did get the discussion back to the ranch.
#1702 of 1788
Re: meanwhile, back at the ranch [nwng] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Feb 27, 2009 (12:41 pm)
Reply

Replying to: nwng (Feb 27, 2009 9:50 am)

America should stick to what it's good at: construction equipment, commercial and private aircraft, and weapons come to mind.
 
As for cars, we made need to explore which types of cars we are good at, and then decide how many companies we really need to make that type of car.
 
Obviously, we are very good at trucks and large 5-6 passenger 4-door cars.
 
#1703 of 1788
Re: meanwhile, back at the ranch [Mr_Shiftright] by lilengineerboy
Feb 27, 2009 (12:51 pm)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Feb 27, 2009 12:41 pm)

America should stick to what it's good at: construction equipment, commercial and private aircraft, and weapons come to mind.
  
As for cars, we made need to explore which types of cars we are good at, and then decide how many companies we really need to make that type of car.
  
Obviously, we are very good at trucks and large 5-6 passenger 4-door cars.

 
Right, might as well just do status quo, no sense in learning a new skill, developing a new competency, or growing the economy...nope not us, just keep doing the same thing again and again...I wonder when the next catastropic economic event will be, or WWIII.
#1704 of 1788
Re: meanwhile, back at the ranch [lilengineerboy] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Feb 27, 2009 (12:59 pm)
Reply

Replying to: lilengineerboy (Feb 27, 2009 12:51 pm)

Growing the economy has nothing to do with cars IMO. Automobiles are a totally mature, totally saturated market. Surely America can develop other technologies---like green tech for instance.
 
Americans can't build small cars. They've been trying for 50 years and they still can't do it. Enough about competency at this point, seems to me.
 
Sometimes the best thing to do is actually give up. This "try and try again" thing is very pollyanna but it isn't working.
 
I think before getting fancy, American automakers should learn how to build cars for a profit. That IS the point, isn't it?
 
Maybe it's not technology but business schools that are needed?
 
As for WW III, it'll be short and final, no need to worry about anything after that one except how to sharpen a stick.
#1705 of 1788
Re: meanwhile, back at the ranch [Mr_Shiftright] by bpizzuti
Feb 27, 2009 (1:17 pm)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Feb 27, 2009 12:59 pm)

Maybe it's not technology but business schools that are needed?
 
We've got lots of business schools, and business school graduates. Look where they got us.
#1706 of 1788
Re: meanwhile, back at the ranch [Mr_Shiftright] by boaz47
Feb 27, 2009 (1:20 pm)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Feb 27, 2009 12:59 pm)

But still if the government has invested in the car companies they can simply nationalize the industry. Look it has happened to us before maybe it is time to turn inward and let us heal before getting back in the save the world game. Restrict Imports or give monster tax breaks to domestic companies to put the pressure on the competition. Make it a issue of national security. I might add the idea that any company accepting bail out money cease and desist any and all off shore job outsourcing. If not they should be allowed to fold and go out of business.
 
I might not like the idea from a civil liberty standpoint but I think we are in a war of survival with the rest of the world. Yes we have to have trade partners but they aren't our friends they are thinking of themselves. We moved too much work off shore and lowered restrictions for trade with countries that never lowered restrictions with us. We might just want to think about protectionism until we as a nation are back on our feet. The global economy idea simply didn't work. If it was supposed to bring everyone up to our level it failed. If it was supposed to bring us down to their level it worked. At least looking at the stock market it seems that way.
#1707 of 1788
Re: meanwhile, back at the ranch [Mr_Shiftright] by lilengineerboy
Feb 27, 2009 (1:21 pm)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Feb 27, 2009 12:59 pm)

Growing the economy has nothing to do with cars IMO. Automobiles are a totally mature, totally saturated market.
 
Sure, in 3 developed markets
 
Surely America can develop other technologies---like green tech for instance.
 
Sure, because windfarms can be anywhere...and there is nothing overlapping between green tech and cars...unless you are a new fangled "hybrid" maker.
 
Americans can't build small cars. They've been trying for 50 years and they still can't do it. Enough about competency at this point, seems to me.
 
How small? Ford Ka small, Ford Fiesta small, or Ford Focus small? Opel Astra small?
 
I think before getting fancy, American automakers should learn how to build cars for a profit. That IS the point, isn't it?
 
I don't know, they just got castrated in congress for building SUVs and trucks that were highly profitable and using those gains to subsidize the other vehicles. I don't know any other major global car maker that sells some vehicles at a loss and makes it up on other ones /sarcasim.
 
What just happened with Ford and the UAW...if the vote passes, then it means a lot of legacy costs being taken out of every vehicle, and a more level playing field. Maybe those other folks in Warren and Auburn Hills can get in on this thing.
 
Nope, no need for progress, everyone just give up and go home. Game over. We can just move paper around pretending its money and opening fast food franchises.
#1708 of 1788
Re: meanwhile, back at the ranch [Mr_Shiftright] by grbeck
Feb 27, 2009 (1:21 pm)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Feb 27, 2009 12:59 pm)

Or, they take the approach of Ford with the Fiesta and upcoming Focus - allow those parts of the world that specialize in that type of car to take the lead on engineering and development. But allow each region which will sell the car to have input and make adjustments as needed for local conditions.
 
The new Fiesta - which certainly LOOKS like a nice car, and is winning rave reviews in Europe - will be the big test of this approach.
 
For that matter, the current Focus isn't a bad car, either. The problem was that Ford of North America thought it didn't have to perform any testing on the European design. Only problem was that it used different vendors and some different parts. That wasn't an engineering decision; that was a cost-accounting decision.
 
Once Ford got the quality kinks worked out (around 2003), the resulting car was actually pretty good.

Messages Page 171 of 179
1
...
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
...
179
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement