Sign In Join 



Does America Even Need Its Own Automakers?

1788 messages,  Last post on Mar 03, 2009 at 2:18 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Automotive News, Truck, Sedan, SUV


Messages Page 125 of 180
1
...
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
...
180
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#1232 of 1788
Re: General Wesley Clark Jumps In [Mr_Shiftright] by fezo
Nov 17, 2008 (10:09 am)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Nov 17, 2008 8:56 am)

I saw Clark's item yesterday. It strikes me that he's purposely leaving out the fact that while we started from scratch in WWII that we now have a permanent defense industry. I can't imagine we rely that heavily on GM.
#1233 of 1788
Re: General Wesley Clark Jumps In [fezo] by gagrice
Nov 17, 2008 (10:19 am)
Reply

Replying to: fezo (Nov 17, 2008 10:09 am)

GM has to be just a bit player in the military field. Most is spent on ships, rockets and aircraft. Wes Clark is just trying to appease his number one admirer Rocky.
#1234 of 1788
Re: I should look at the bright side... [lemko] by xrunner2
Nov 17, 2008 (10:20 am)
Reply

Replying to: lemko (Nov 17, 2008 10:02 am)

An RX is a pseudo SUV you buy for your trophy wife.
 
That is an insult to many professional women who make their own car buying decisions. My wife, a professional, has not considered American brands in her car buying decisons over the last couple decades.
#1235 of 1788
Re: General Wesley Clark Jumps In [fezo] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Nov 17, 2008 (10:24 am)
Reply

Replying to: fezo (Nov 17, 2008 10:09 am)

Usually Clark is quite cogent. What's he thinking? That the USA is going to be fighting tank battles like the breakout at Normandy or something?
 
Seems to me modern wars are going to be small, dirty and right in with the civilian populations. They'll also be wars for hearts and minds, not territory.
 
If there's any massive industrial power that would be needed for national security in the future, it would be for aircraft, military robotics and law enforcement equipment. Not GMs strong points.
 
What's he saying? That Caterpillar can't make an armored personnel carrier?
#1236 of 1788
Re: General Wesley Clark Jumps In [Mr_Shiftright] by gagrice
Nov 17, 2008 (10:31 am)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Nov 17, 2008 10:24 am)

Unless the Big 3 are able to build drones and the associated armament and control electronics, I would say they are not really in the picture. Iraq may be the last real ground war we fight. Though they did find uranium in that place in Syria we just bombed. So who knows what the future will bring.
#1237 of 1788
Re: General Wesley Clark Jumps In [gagrice] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Nov 17, 2008 (11:06 am)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Nov 17, 2008 10:31 am)

Whatever it brings, it seems like tanks and aircraft carriers and even human pilots are fast disappearing into history. There may be a need for 'boots on the ground' but those boots are going to fly in, do the job and go away IMO. The USA can't police the world. Nobody can.
 
I'm sure we'll need weapons and an army for the next XXX years but it won't look anything like it did in 2003 and I don't think the Big Three in anything like its current form will be building it.
 
So the arguments in favor of bail out so far seem to be:
 
1. If the Big Three goes bankrupt, the US economy will collapse
 
2. If the Big Three goes bankrupt, our enemies will overrun us
 
I'm not buying either myself. These claims strike me as alarmist and without solid evidence.
#1238 of 1788
Edmunds says give 'em the money by steve_ HOST
Nov 17, 2008 (11:49 am)
Reply
"We at Edmunds.com urge Congress to vote yes."
 
Congress: Vote Yes on Automaker Loans
 
(I'm not sure that all us hosts out here in the hinterlands got the memo, lol).
#1239 of 1788
Re: I should look at the bright side... [xrunner2] by fintail
Nov 17, 2008 (12:05 pm)
Reply

Replying to: xrunner2 (Nov 17, 2008 10:20 am)

Trophy wives are professionals..in fact, kind of part of the oldest profession
#1240 of 1788
Re: Edmunds says give 'em the money [steve_] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Nov 17, 2008 (12:25 pm)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Nov 17, 2008 11:49 am)

Well show us the package and the deal, then. No sense giving them money AND having them fail anyway, right?
#1241 of 1788
Re: Edmunds says give 'em the money [steve_] by nippononly
Nov 17, 2008 (12:29 pm)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Nov 17, 2008 11:49 am)

Oh geez, I may have to stop posting at Edmunds in protest. Just look at this idiotic editorial.
 
Disagree with this: This is a financial crisis, and not one of the auto industry's making
 
STRONGLY disagree with this: Further, the impact of the demise of the auto industry on the global economy would be devastating,
 
Who is writing this junk? As for U.S. taxpayers footing the bill - they will one way or another. They can ante up now for $25 billion or $50 billion loans whatever it turns out to be
...and then $25 billion more next year, and then $50 billion two years after that. And that's AFTER THIS LOAN, "whatever it turns out to be" - what, $100 billion? More? These greedy execs keep whining for more as soon as the last increase is accepted.
 
You can rest assured, if we pay now we will keep paying and paying and paying, and even THEN I am not real convinced GM will make it to 2020. I know Chrysler won't.
 
The part that might actually make me puke is the last part: So Congress, go ahead, point fingers. There's plenty of blame to go around, you included. Debate all you want; in fact, add the debate over a national energy policy and a national industrial policy to your future agenda. Chastise union workers and auto company execs. Attach strings to the loans. Do your political grandstanding.
 
Do what you have to do, Congress. But get the job done - now.

 
OMG! How trite can you get? I don't want grandstanding or chastisement, I want top-to-bottom total reform if we give these automakers one dime. I want the UAW contracts wiped out and new ones put in place at the average auto industry wage. I want every exec gone. I want NOT ONE SHRED of "business as usual" to remain at these dinosaur corporations.
 
And as so many have pointed out here already, I can't have any of that because the law prevents it. So no, NO BAILOUT (don't even call them a loan, what a joke).

Messages Page 125 of 180
1
...
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
...
180
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement