Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Automotive News & Views Does America Even Need Its Own Automakers?
1788 messages, Last post on Mar 03, 2009 at 2:18 PM
You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires
|
|
|---|---|
|
considered the possibility that the domestics may just NEVER make it back to profitability? They have had a "great plan with a turnaround just around the corner" for soooo long. Why is anyone convinced that now is any different, even if the economy HADN'T tanked? Me, I don't think we need our own automakers if they are going to be perennially unprofitable. Better then just to leave automaking to companies that know how to do it and make money at the same time. As for the bailout, where was the steelworkers' bailout? The clothing manufacturers' bailout? If GM did liquidate, established automakers from all over would step into the void and buy up some of the brands and keep them running with all-new products uniquely their own, I'm convinced. If for no other reason than that large and established dealer network. INDIVIDUAL names and products at GM have cash value, the problem is just that the vast majority do not.
|
|
|
Replying to: nippononly (Nov 15, 2008 1:06 pm) They got theirs earlier this decade. Bush administration lifts steel tariffs CNN Looks like clothing tariffs still exist. I think one or all of the Big 3 could remain unprofitable. Going out of business slowly in this climate may be easier for the country to absorb than a bankruptcy reorganization by GM or a liquidation sale by Chrysler. "In the next two to four months, GM will run out of cash and turn out the lights. Only government money can prevent that." The Cost of General Motors' Death Much Greater Than a GM Bailout, Editorial Says
|
|
|
Replying to: lemko (Nov 15, 2008 8:36 am)  Regards, OW |
|
|
Replying to: steve_ (Nov 15, 2008 3:14 pm) Either way, no pain, no gain. Change hurts and big change hurts big time. At the end of the day, they will get help from us. First I have to buy second rate product and now I have to bail them out...along with the financial thieves. I love this country! Really. No matter what happens, there is always a second chance! So, the moral of the story is " Relax! It will all work out just fine." I really can not wait for the new cars produced as a result of a major overhaul of this industry. Perhaps in 3 years or so. Regards, OW
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: circlew (Nov 15, 2008 4:46 pm) If I am right, then the victory will go to the technological leaders, not the design leaders/style leaders, and that does not give me a good feeling for the future of the Big Three.
|
|
|
Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Nov 15, 2008 5:00 pm) As far as the future of the Big Three relating to design, retro was only one way to go but you can't tell me they led the way in design over the last 30 years which they should have. (I look at the Cobalt and feel PAIN!) I believe that the basic structure of these companies limit their capabilities in the end after a certain critical mass is reached in terms of size. Cutting quality of parts and design got them where they are today. Nothing is more telling than the disaster interiors in the GM stuff up until 2008 saw CTS, Lambda and Malibu. What, they all of a sudden woke up? It might have been better off to have 10 auto companies in the US instead of one. Failure of all 10 at the same time would be far removed than we are today. Toyota is getting there fast and should continuously re-invent itself to stay solvent. They have a far better strategic infrastructure but cracks have been forming of late. Who knows what the future brings but I would welcome many companies the size of BMW or Mercedes in the US to stimulate competition and better products in design and tech. Perhaps we already can see this will take place as the global players face the new reality. Regards, OW
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: circlew (Nov 15, 2008 5:31 pm) I don't see how a computer is going to fit pieces of plastic and steel and glass together any more imaginatively than before. Remember, this is a finite universe. We are not talking about thoughts or ideas or undiscovered technology, but doors and windows and fenders in 3D space. The combinations are limited. If anything, computers merely accelerated the End of Design. So I'm betting that new technology will have the same appeal that "design" used to have. Instead of "looking good" we will be "working good". Electronics will become a status symbol rather than fashion being status. Don't you think that this, in a sense, explains the success of Toyota Hybrids and BMW 3-Series cars? Toyota's Prius and Mr. Bangle's trunk lids certainly can't be called "pretty".
|
|
|
Replying to: jeffyscott (Nov 15, 2008 7:30 am) Just curious, what decisions went into you and your wives' moves to foreign nameplates?
|
|
|
Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Nov 15, 2008 5:55 pm) But I do agree I'd rather see a preference change to Working Good from Looking good. Perhaps that's one of the strengths the new paradigm for US Auto needs to pursue because the other global competition are far ahead here. just in build quality alone and mechanical integrity. In terms of status from that perspective, the lines in the sand were drawn years ago. Yes, the Prius and the Bangle designs are tough on the eyes but the hybrids appeal is a new status. But don't you think we have a way to go on the looks side of things?    Regards, OW
|
|
|
Replying to: lemko (Nov 14, 2008 1:29 pm) |
|
You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views Does America Even Need Its Own Automakers?
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
