- #28 of 128
-
Re: 2007 GMC Sierra Denali Full Test [guysykes]
by idriveasunbird
-
May 28, 2007 (7:43 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: guysykes (May 25, 2007 12:37 am)
Well Mark if you knew what I was talking about I'm sure it would have all clicked... well lets not wait around for that I guess. I was replying to a comment about the ability to put aftermarket parts on a truck. Someone had stated that the Tundra had no chance at keeping up with the Denali in the aftermarket world and I disagreed. My statement about the less than $30,000 5.7 L Tundra was completely accurate and relevent to what I was talking about, nice try in keeping up with the conversation though. Finally, I didn't realize people bought $40,000 trucks simply for the pure enjoyment of going to and from the gas station as much as possible while sitting in leather seats. Apparently that is what the Denali is for. As far as a pickup truck goes, and that afterall is what the Denali is, the Tundra is more capable in every aspect a pickup is used for. Towing hauling and offroad ability. Looks are completely personal, case in point is last years Silverado/Sierra which quite possibly was... in my opinion... the ugliest truck ever made. You definetly can buy a Tundra with just about everything your Denali has though and a few things it does not have, it will cost roughly the same as well. You can even buy a Tundra with more than your Denali can offer and spend a little more if you choose. Either way you slice it you can get essentially the same options at a similiar price with more Truck capability from Toyota. It's OK to be upest and not acknowledge the fact that you purchased an inferior product simply based on looks. Many Americans buy grossly inferior products based on name alone, you will fit right in.
|
- #29 of 128
-
Re: 2007 GMC Sierra Denali Full Test [idriveasunbird]
by idriveasunbird
-
May 28, 2007 (8:08 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: idriveasunbird (May 28, 2007 7:43 pm)
*Mark should be Guy
Also nit picking what I say is, I don't know, elementary, especially when you make yourself sound stupid by being wrong. A turbocharger by definition is a supercharger. So what exactly was your point with the little "HAHA" after saying I must have meant turbocharger when I said supercharger?
I realize this has nothing to do with what I was talking about, but I am just trying to clarify why you picked that out in an attempt to make your point look better?
|
- #30 of 128
-
Re: 2007 GMC Sierra Denali Full Test [1offroader]
by davethecarnut
-
May 28, 2007 (8:39 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: 1offroader (May 28, 2007 7:38 am)
Can I sweep out your garage instead of payment?
|
- #31 of 128
-
Re: 2007 GMC Sierra Denali Full Test [idriveasunbird]
by markisliev
-
May 29, 2007 (6:01 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: idriveasunbird (May 28, 2007 8:08 pm)
I understand 100% about what you mean. You are looking to buy an affordable truck that will go fast, i've been there many times! You should buy a Chevy, this is a new body single cab ...only has a 5.3 but runs 13.1 in the 1/4 mile off of only a tune, intake, exhaust, and headers that's it!
13.1 sec 1/4 mile 2007 Regular Cab Short Bed
The Tundra will not be capable of those kinds of improvements anytime soon because you can't tune them! Now just think what can be done to the Denali. The new LS3 Vette motor is pretty much the same as the Denali motor (L92) as usual they will have plenty of aftermarket support! I can ask for Vette Heads, CAM, Intake Manifold, and stall converter if I want, can you? In other words I can make that Chevy just as fast naturally aspirated as what you could do with blown Blundra and not have to spend near as much! Just think if I put a blower on the Denali after modding the motor. With the Denali there is more potential, just admit it dude!
I'll nit pick all I want, I like to talk trucks. I'm not the one going to a Tundra room because I dislike a few things Toyota did. You are just here to bash! After all we are talking about performance right? Anyone into performance knows damn well a turbo and a supercharger are not the same thing. But I guess you have it all figured out. So go right ahead with your twin supercharger setup.... Let me know how that works out!
|
- #32 of 128
-
Disagree
by idriveasunbird
-
May 30, 2007 (7:49 pm)
-
|
How much HP do you have to add to that 5.3 L to knock almost 2 and a half seconds off a 1/4 mile time? Thats a pretty good accomplish for as easy as you made it sound Mark. Also I don't know what to tell you on the supercharger big guy but anyone who knows specifics will tell you that a turbocharger is merely a type of a supercharger. The only thing the turbo means is turbine, a turbocharger simply is an exhaust driven turbine supercharger. Don't know what to tell you, I guess you can go look it up and get back to me. Here you go, check it out for yourself, since you like links I've put a few up there just to drive it home to you.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/turbocharger
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supercharger
http://www.answers.com/turbocharger
|
- #33 of 128
-
Re: Disagree [idriveasunbird]
by markisliev
-
May 31, 2007 (5:34 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: idriveasunbird (May 30, 2007 7:49 pm)
There is a lot of power that can be uncorked with a "custom tune" alone. Custom tune provides better gains than you would expect from a hypertech style programmer for gas motors if you were to compare the 2. Peak HP will not be increased near as much as the low end power that it takes to get a big truck moving. That 5.3 truck ran 14.6 bone stock at the track with slicks. There is something that a tune gets rid of on stock motors call Tq management. It protects the drive train from stress by reducing wide open throttle power off the line and until a predetermined speed. A tune also gets rid of GM's 4 second delay in open and closed loop fuel mapping this help with fuel economy but kills performance. That's one of the reasons GM has show good fuel economy lately. Besides that they will tweak electronic throttle control and bump up the timing to accommodate whatever octane fuel you chose to run. All of this is probably good for an additional 35 peak Hp on the 5.3 but much more gains in the earlier parts of the power band. It's common for a custom tune to knock a full second off of the 1/4 mile on a GM truck. I will be using "nelson performance" for tuning, Google around some good info on his site…They are getting 40 additional horse power on the dyno from a 6.2 tune, that amounts to about 48Hp at the flywheel if you factor in drive train loss. With headers intake and exhaust I can have the Denali right at 500hp without even going into the motor…not bad for just a few bolt on’s. Imagine a new vette CAM, Vette Heads, and a Supercharger or turbo on top of that...
I guess you are missing the point about the S/C & Turbo...Sure they both force air into a motor, but they are diff animals if you are a fan of forced induction...I just never heard of anyone really into performance mix these 2 up...that's why I was giving you a tough time. You will never see a twin supercharger setup for a Tundra...Toyota (TRD) usually goes with roots style supercharger that sits directly on top of the motor… only room for one there.
|
- #34 of 128
-
When will 2007 Sierra Denalis be available if you didn't pre-order one?
by 2007denali
-
Jun 04, 2007 (6:21 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: markisliev (May 31, 2007 5:34 am)
Does anyone know when 2007 GMC Sierra Denalis will be available on dealer's lots for those of us who did not pre-order? I emailed GM and they indicated they are already available, but I haven't been able to locate one on www.gmbuypower.com. I'm looking for black exterior, cocoa/beige interior, AWD, 20s, and a sunroof. Can't wait to get rid of my 2004 Chevy Silverado 4.8L bone stock LS extended cab! By the way, does anyone know how fast a 2004 Silverado like mine will do 0-60mph? I’m hoping my new Sierra Denali will be considerably faster.
|
- #35 of 128
-
Re: When will 2007 Sierra Denalis be available if you didn't pre-order one? [2007denali]
by markisliev
-
Jun 05, 2007 (4:39 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: 2007denali (Jun 04, 2007 6:21 pm)
There are a few on dealer lots here and there. Your local GMC dealer should be able to locate you one if they don't have one on the lot. I am finding that it's hard to be picky unless you special order. For instance, I want a white 2wd... that's not real hard to find. I just can't find a white, 2wd, black interior, 20's, DVD Nav GPS, power sliding rear glass. Get's harder to locate one if you are picky like me. I'll probably have to order something. I will keep looking for a little while longer since trucks already on the lot are discouted more...
This is what I want my baby to look like.
|
- #36 of 128
-
18 vs 20in wheels
by les88
-
Jun 19, 2007 (8:34 pm)
-
|
|
I bought a 2007 sierra denali about 2 months ago, and it is a great truck. If you are looking to get one, you might want to drive one with the standard 18in wheels as well as the 20in. The 20in corners better but the 18in rides noticeably smoother(taller tire aspect ratio) and saves you a couple grand.
|
- #37 of 128
-
Got mine on 6-21
by vetracer
-
Jun 23, 2007 (6:23 pm)
-
|
">I got mine Thursday 6-21. Here's a few pics:
<IMGSRC="http://pic40.picturetrail.com/VOL283/1553091/16922586/261558982.jpg" border="0" alt="Image Hosting by PictureTrail.com">
|
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Pickups 
