You are here: Forums SUVs Acura MDX Acura MDX vs Buick Enclave CXL

Acura MDX vs Buick Enclave CXL

35 messages,  Last post on Feb 09, 2008 at 6:18 AM

You are in the Acura MDX Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Acura MDX, Buick Enclave, Car Buying, SUV

Messages Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

#6 of 35 Re: Buick beats Acura [celica8] by weldonblair Jun 13, 2007 (2:38 pm)
Replying to: celica8 (May 14, 2007 5:48 pm) I used to own an Acura and a VW. While the Acura I owned was an excellent car, the VW was a money pit and always in the shop, sometimes repeatedly for the same problem, at $1,000 a pop. When GM was having the employee pricing strategy in 2005, I leased two GM cars (including a Buick Ranier). Both cars have been extremenly reliable and the service I get when I take the cars in for service surpasses what I used to get at my old Acura dealer. That being said, I am not sure how I feel about the Enclave. On paper it is a great car. Having test driven it, however, I was very disappointed with the acceleration and the "tiptronic" mode of the 6-speed transmission did little to improve the off-the-line acceleration. Since then I have test driven both the new MDX and the Audi Q7 4.2. The MDX is a great, great SUV with terriffic seats. The Q7 was just, well, awesome. Its amazing what an extra 25 or 75 horsepower and torque can do! Replies to this message: ody02tjk (Jun 14, 2007 1:25 pm) sookmdx (Aug 03, 2007 3:15 pm)
#7 of 35 Re: Buick beats Acura [weldonblair] by ody02tjk Jun 14, 2007 (1:25 pm)
Replying to: weldonblair (Jun 13, 2007 2:38 pm) I whittled my shopping list down to the MDX, the Q7, and the Enclave. I must agree with your assessment of the Buick. While it is cheaper, and has more interior room, the driving experience just does not measure up to the other 2 SUV's. Due to a need for space, and the fact that I like a very large sunroof, as well as near 0% financing on a lease, I leased a Q7 3.6 Premium. It drives as nice as the MDX, and is nearly $140 less per month. I am a little worried about reliability, but I can always turn in from the lease. I have read a little about some engine issues in Q7's built early last year, but it sounds like Audi addressed things quickly and treated customers very well. Coming from a Lexus, my expectations for service are high. It should be noted, though, that if I leased a loaded Buick Enclave, the monthly payment would have been nearly $200 less than my Audi. My recommendations are to lease the Q7 if you can swing it. Replies to this message: sookmdx (Aug 03, 2007 3:15 pm)
#8 of 35 jimjack by jimjack Jun 23, 2007 (8:20 am)
I've enjoyed the discussions re: the Enclave CXL,Acadia SLT2, MDX & the Q7 3.2 premium. I've gone thru the full line of vehicles to get to the one that will do the most for me that I had on my list for priorities. They were: ride, quietness, performance, mpg, power to pull a 4k lbs boat, looks, equipment offered and the dollars. I found the MDX able to pull 5k lbs, powerful, very agile, performance better than the Enclave, attractive inside and out exept the front end grill work. The equipment that I wanted put the MDX nearly $8K more than the Enclave. the residual was touted to be 62% however which was very good. The Enclave/Acadia was smoother in ride to either the MDX & the Q7. Performance on the Enclave was decent but did not blow my doors off. Was very acceptable for typical driving however. More quiet than the other 2. Well appointed and attractive in and out. The rear camera was offered as an extra that can be put on. I want that. I would choose to allow the 18" wheels stay on while I ordered 20" on my own. I want chrome wheels not their polished. My greatest issue is the torque or lack there of. The ability to pull from a stop will my boat is in tow is very important. I should be able to stay with other traffic and not be looked upon as " damn boat puller, get moving will ya". The Q7 V6 was a new experience for me just yesterday for kicks. More money than the other 2. Nicely appointed and looks good in and out. The V6 was not much different than the enclave however. Both their V8 and 6 were rough in nature in their ride and acceleration. Pretty much like an SUV I suppose. I own an 02 Suburban at present. The MPG present a negative factor for me. The MDX is 16-22, the Enclave is 16-22/24 while the Q7 is 15-20 and 14-19 on the V8. Now, the Q7 4.2 is the winner as far as torque and power and it will pull 6600 lbs. But the V6 is in the middle of the MDX and Enclave. 4500lbs for the Enclave Acadia and 5k lbs on the MDX. I'll go back to try out the Q7 but the cost takes me further than I choose to want to go. A bit more than the Acura. Their Lease has got to be a good one and the residual must have some pop to it. I'm truing to get the Enclave/Acadia dealer to hook my boat up for a pull session. About a 4 mile pull will do me just fine.. That will be the answer I seek in the engine department. I have enjoyed my Suburban and has given Zero Grief. A battery and rear brakes 86k mi. But, it is eating 13 mpg and that really hurts any more..
#9 of 35 Re: Acura MDX vs. Buick Enclave CXL [ody02tjk] by epiney Jun 25, 2007 (10:25 am)
Replying to: ody02tjk (May 14, 2007 5:41 pm) Probing further, I found out that the MDX now has a 3 year residual of 57%, while for the Enclave it was 63% at 3 years. I have also found that you can get an Audi Q7 3.6 Premiun for just $650 a month as well (with a subsidized lease from Audi). Has anyone found that the MDX's are not getting the residual rates they used to?   Can you post the source of this info? I have been looking at both vehicles as well and just looked at the TCO for teh Enclave on Edmunds. The predicted depreciation for the Enclave is staggering compared with the MDX. It's a new model, so info would be scarce, but if it's close to true than what you gain on teh purcahse could be more than lost at trade in time. Replies to this message: ody02tjk (Jun 25, 2007 12:58 pm) epiney (Jun 25, 2007 1:35 pm) ody02tjk (Jun 25, 2007 2:18 pm) and 1 more...
#10 of 35 Re: Acura MDX vs. Buick Enclave CXL [epiney] by ody02tjk Jun 25, 2007 (12:58 pm)
Replying to: epiney (Jun 25, 2007 10:25 am) Epiney: I received this information from Acura, Buick and Audi dealers when I was shopping late last month. I do not know what is the cause of this issue with Acura's, but I found that the residuals were better for the Buick (63%) and lower (52%) for the Audi. However, with Audi, the lease factor rate is at .00019 (0.465%), while the Buick rate is .003 (7.2%). Audi is subsidizing their leases this way. The Acura had a sales price around $48K and rate I was quoted on the Acura lease was above 8%. This caused the lease pmt (nothing down except taxes) on the MDX Tech/Sport to be more than $850 per month. The lease payment on my Audi was only about $20 more a month ($672 vs $651) than the Buick. IF you are BUYING the car, both the Buick Enclave and the Audi Q7 can be gotten close to invoice prices, if not less. However, the Buick is the best deal about $40K (CXL AWD loaded) at invoice, compared to the the Audi at about $53K. If you are leasing, however, the monthly price difference is quite small, due to the VERY low rate on the lease. Since there is no history yet for the GM Midsize SUV's, I believe GM is setting the residuals for the Enclave high, in anticipation. Several dealers quoted me the 63% residual rate at 3 years, with 12K miles per year. I liked the style of the Audi, as well as its huge sunroof, and did not have to wait to get the color I wanted, so the Q7 is what I leased. Replies to this message: epiney (Jun 25, 2007 1:35 pm) ody02tjk (Jun 25, 2007 2:18 pm) epiney (Jun 25, 2007 4:25 pm)
#11 of 35 Re: Acura MDX vs. Buick Enclave CXL [ody02tjk] by epiney Jun 25, 2007 (1:35 pm)
Replying to: ody02tjk (Jun 25, 2007 12:58 pm) Thanks ody02tjk. Iwas only considering an outright buy, which doesn't make sense on the Audi with those low lease rates. Buying the Enclave concerns me as the TCO in Edmunds predicts horrible depreciation. At least with a lease, your residual is locked in. The mileage is a bit unpredictable, that's why I am heavily favoring purchase.   I think the MDX is close to invoice now so at about $44, it's only about $4K more than the Enclve and almost $10K less than the Q7. I am worried about the Audi reliability as well.   Bothe the Buick Enclave and teh Hyundai Veracruz look interesting to buy, but unknown resale value has me thinking twice and staying "safe" with the MDX Replies to this message: ody02tjk (Jun 25, 2007 2:18 pm) epiney (Jun 25, 2007 4:25 pm)
#12 of 35 Re: Acura MDX vs. Buick Enclave CXL [epiney] by ody02tjk Jun 25, 2007 (2:18 pm)
Replying to: epiney (Jun 25, 2007 1:35 pm) Did you take a look at the Mazda CX-9? That was my #3 choice, behind the Audi and the Buick, and well ahead of the MDX. The CX-9 has more room, and a much larger 3rd seat and rear storage than the MDX. Also, the Mazda handles as well as the MDX, if not better. While it may not be quite as luxurious as the Acura, a loaded CX-9 Gran Touring(with Nav, Sunroof, 20inch wheels, etc) was selling at near invoice of $38K. I was VERY impressed with it. I also tested the Veracruz, but was not impressed at all. The Mazda seems to be the real value in this size vehicle. What state are you in? I am in MD, and the Acura dealers around here would only go about $2k below sticker. I am a bit worried about the Audi reliability, and that was another reason I leased. Since all of these vehicles are in the first model year (MDX, Enclave, CX9, Q7, ACADIA, Veracruz), I did not want to take a chance with any of them. Replies to this message: epiney (Jun 25, 2007 4:25 pm)
#13 of 35 jimjack by jimjack Jun 25, 2007 (3:47 pm)
I'm in California (East Bay Area). I have the MDX (07)in mind as well as the Enclave (08) or Acadia (07). The MDX with a sport package is available to me at present 500 over invoice. The Enclave (CXL fully loaded) dealer hasn't gotten back to me just yet and I'm grinding them down in hopes of an invoice price. The Acadia SLT 2 fully equiped (same dealer as the Enclave) is invoice along with their promo called conquest that is a cradit of 1K.
#14 of 35 Re: Acura MDX vs. Buick Enclave CXL [ody02tjk] by epiney Jun 25, 2007 (4:25 pm)
Replying to: ody02tjk (Jun 25, 2007 2:18 pm) I had a quick look at the CX-9. Since we are so close to MY changeover, I am holding out for an 08. Will start test driving in a couple of months. Doing some upfront research. The CX-9 was bigger and had better access to the third row. I felt the MDX had a nicer interior. The CX-9 does not offer memory on the mirrors and steering wheel at any price. It may seem minor, but that's a big deal to us. It's almost a deal breaker. Your lease rate on the Q7 has me taking another look at it!
#15 of 35 Kids? Long Trips? by merlin14 Jun 25, 2007 (4:33 pm)
I have just read the posts. I am also considering both an Enclave and an MDX. Whichever vehicle we use needs to be able to withstand ice/snow in North Dakota, driving and towing in the mountains, fit in our garage (6'3 clearance) and be comfortable for three adults and two child seats. I looked at most cars mentioned in the posts, but have only test-driven the MDX. I only "discoverd" the Enclave a week ago. We were very happy (except for the garage problem) with our Yukon XL until gas prices took to soaring and our frequent trips to the Dakotas from the Carolinas became less frequent. The Acura is more expensive because it is more of a "luxury" vehicle. I know that its safety rating are phenomenal and according to Consumer Reports the SH-AWD is amazing on hairpin turns and snow and ice. Has anyone used either of these vehicles in a harsh environment (granted the Enclave is too new for a summer yet)? Or has anyone tried a 1000 mile trip with two or more kids under 5? Replies to this message: eclipse2 (Jun 28, 2007 6:16 am)

Messages Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

You are here: Forums SUVs Acura MDX Acura MDX vs Buick Enclave CXL