Sign In Join 



What do you like to see on next Outlander?

95 messages,  Last post on May 23, 2008 at 3:43 PM

You are in the Mitsubishi Outlander Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Mitsubishi Outlander, SUV


Messages Page 4 of 10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
10
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#26 of 95
Re: . [rcpax] by chelentano
May 12, 2007 (11:02 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rcpax (May 12, 2007 7:28 pm)

Most of the things listed in this thread are already available?
 
Most? Not "most":
1. Navi LCD mounted on articulating-ajustable arm.
2. Web browser with Sprint EVDO access.
3. Nicer, more luxury looking instrumentation with blue lights instead of red (or even with option to pick lights color).
4. Better place for the parking brake.
5. Wider body for more space, better stability and better styling.
6. Wide panoramic rear view mirror.
7. Rear view video camera
8. Twice bigger opening for the sunroof
9. Few more horses to the engine
10. Couple more gallons to the tank
12. Interior wood trim accents.
13. Bumper guards like on some BMWs, but not in black: matching body color or clear.
14. Push button keyless ignition, instead of turn-knob.
15. Beige interior should be available with every exterior color.
16. Hybrid version.
18. Illuminate all the power controls on the driver's door.
19. Real horn
20. Liftgate closing with less effort or better power liftgate.
21. Option to remove 3rd row seat to convert to storage.
22. Smaller Fastkey remote.
 
Anyway, this thread is not about features availabe "in other markets". It's about wishful thinking.
#27 of 95
Re: . [chelentano] by busta4
May 13, 2007 (6:49 am)
Reply

Replying to: chelentano (May 12, 2007 11:02 pm)

I like your suggestions. I would add, on my wish list, a giant step up in the quality of the interior plastic. I can not believe how cheap the interior is. A write up on the vehicle says it best..
 
"Inside, the Outlander is both good and bad. The seats, leather clad in our test car, were comfortable and power adjustable on the driver's side. But there was no lumbar adjustment, something that we thought odd at this price. Wind whistle was prominent from all sides and especially at any speed over 60. There was too much road noise as well, again considering the $30,615 price sticker for our top-of-the-line XLS model.
There was an overabundance of hard plastic inside, the doors sounded cheap when closed, and the third row seat was, at best, a joke. Your cat would not be comfortable back there.
#28 of 95
Re: . [chelentano] by rcpax
May 13, 2007 (7:29 am)
Reply

Replying to: chelentano (May 12, 2007 11:02 pm)

Well here's a short list of the features available in other markets:
From dodo's list
1. Auto on/off headlights. - AU
2. Heated mirrors (still not sure the current models have them as rumored).-AU
3. Sunglass holder-UK
4. Better door panels or at least painted silver door handles (not chrome).- US
6. Remote rear seats release in the cargo area.-UK
7. OEM crossbars.- UK, rest of EU
 
(these are your suggestions below:)
Rear view video camera - Japan
Chrome grill and additional chrome accents on exterior. -UK
Interior wood trim accents- Japan
Push button keyless ignition, instead of turn-knob - Japan
 
It's still a wish list because we don't have it locally.
#29 of 95
Re: . [busta4] by rcpax
May 13, 2007 (7:33 am)
Reply

Replying to: busta4 (May 13, 2007 6:49 am)

I would add, on my wish list, a giant step up in the quality of the interior plastic. I can not believe how cheap the interior is.
 
Got a ride in a Nissan X-Terra yesterday, and the door handles are made of plastic, which looks worst than that of the Outlander's.
#30 of 95
Re: . [rcpax] by chelentano
May 13, 2007 (10:22 am)
Reply

Replying to: rcpax (May 13, 2007 7:29 am)

I went to other internatioanl Mitsu sites and that's what I found:
 
1. Auto on/off headlights. - AU: This is a current US feature - no big deal
2. Heated mirrors.-AU: NO in AU, but YES in UK. They are also remotly folding
3. Sunglass holder-UK: YES
4. Painted exterior silver door handles (not chrome).- US: They are silver in US
6. Remote rear seats release in the cargo area.-UK NO
7. OEM crossbars.- UK, rest of EU: NO in UK but YES in JP
  
8. Rear view video camera - Japan: YES
9. Chrome grill: NOT the whole grill, just a trim as in US
9b. additional chrome accents on exterior. -UK: YES
10. Interior wood trim accents - Japan: YES
11. Push button keyless ignition, instead of turn-knob - Japan: YES
12. Both Japanese and UK versions have parking censors.
 
Japanese Outlander has tons of optional accessories:
http://www.mitsubishi-motors.co.jp/support/accessory/catalog/pdf/OUTLANDER.pdf
Most of these options though are not part of packages so they could get expensive if you get them one by one.
#31 of 95
Re: . [chelentano] by dodo2
May 13, 2007 (6:06 pm)
Reply

Replying to: chelentano (May 13, 2007 10:22 am)

Nothing in my wish list is available in the US/Canada versions. I'm aware that some of the options are available in other markets and I wish Mitsu brought them over here, but I also understand that they had to keep the price down so they dropped some of them.
In regards to the door handles, I meant the interior ones not the exterior.
The headlights are AUTO OFF only in the US/Canada version. I wish for AUTO ON too.
The crossbars available in other markets, are rebadged Thule. I meant really OEM, customized for this car.
The upper part of the door panels give the interior a cheap look and they are prone to scratches; also the HVAC controls in the LS are "clicky" and on the cheap side. They would benefit from a bit of improvement. The other interior pieces I mentioned could definitely use some improvements too. Please note that I'm talking details here. Most people wouldn't notice some of them.
I know this car's details very well, as I literally studied it for months before I got it and now I drive it every day.
Despite the rather long wish list, I love it and I would buy it again over any other compact SUV in this class.
I forgot to mention that, in an ideal world, I would have liked to have few more horses - 240 hp and few more lb. ft. of torque. However, the current setup has enough power as far as I'm concerned.
#32 of 95
Re: . [dodo2] by rcpax
May 13, 2007 (7:39 pm)
Reply

Replying to: dodo2 (May 13, 2007 6:06 pm)

I would have liked to have few more horses - 240 hp and few more lb. ft. of torque
 
Actually, I would have wanted the 2.4L petrol engine as a choice (which eventually will be offered, as rumored). Japan, and some markets have the 2.4L petrol engine as an option, and I bet it doesn't make a world of difference in terms of spirited driving. Though I wouldn't dream of towing a boat or a big trailer with it. I am after the greater mileage values a 2.4L engine would offer vs the 3.0L, now that we are hearing news of a possible 4$/gal of gas. Crazy, just plain crazy.
#33 of 95
Re: . [dodo2] by chelentano
May 13, 2007 (7:50 pm)
Reply

Replying to: dodo2 (May 13, 2007 6:06 pm)

>> The headlights are AUTO OFF only in the US/Canada version. I wish for AUTO ON too.
 
Daytime lights are running full-time already in US version. Is not it the same as AUTO ON? Or you expecting sensor activated lights?
 
>> The crossbars available in other markets, are rebadged Thule. I meant really OEM, customized for this car.
 
Take a look at my link. The 1st page of the catalog says "mitsu genuine parts" and you can find cross bars there.
  
 
>> The upper part of the door panels give the interior a cheap look and they are prone to scratches; also the HVAC controls in the LS are "clicky" and on the cheap side. They would benefit from a bit of improvement. The other interior pieces I mentioned could definitely use some improvements too.
 
I agree, and it's interesting that in Japan they already have chrome interior handles and door/dash wood trim available. My guess they will bring these to US at some point.
#34 of 95
Re: . [rcpax] by chelentano
May 13, 2007 (7:53 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rcpax (May 13, 2007 7:39 pm)

I would agree with Dodo2: a few more horses would be great. This would not nesesseraly decrease MPG. RAV4 for instance has 269 HP while MPG is just slightly worse.
#35 of 95
Re: . [rcpax] by dodo2
May 13, 2007 (8:21 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rcpax (May 13, 2007 7:39 pm)

As far as I'm concerned, the small V6 was one of the selling points for the Outlander. I would not buy a car this size with an I4. But this is me only.
Now, the 220 HP in the Outlander is about right and has enough power to give me the performance I want with decent gas mileage. But a bit more power, with similar fuel economy would be nicer. This thread is about wishful thinking after all.
See the 3.0 V6 244 hp in the Honda Accord, with decent fuel economy as well.

Messages Page 4 of 10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
10
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement