Sign In Join 



subaru transmission problems

71 messages,  Last post on Sep 14, 2009 at 4:09 AM

You are in the Subaru Forester Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Subaru Forester, Transmission, Wagon


Messages Page 5 of 7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#41 of 71
Re: rear differential in automatic Forester [xwesx] by openeyes
Oct 24, 2008 (1:48 pm)
Reply

Replying to: xwesx (Oct 24, 2008 7:34 am)

Purchase date was Oct 01 so that five year (aka end of warranty regardless of mileage) was Oct 06. For the record, never towed anything, never climbed anything, just standard basic driving on paved roads... but the transmission still reached the brink of failure.
#42 of 71
Re: rear differential in automatic Forester [openeyes] by xwesx
Oct 24, 2008 (2:27 pm)
Reply

Replying to: openeyes (Oct 24, 2008 1:48 pm)

Ah, okay, I had not caught the vehicle's year or age.
 
Well, heck, that is a tough one. Yes, the transmission probably failed from some crazy manufacturing-related malady but, as it is outside of the warranty period, the company has no obligation to the car any longer. It is good that they are willing to offer some assistance in the case, which is indicative that they feel they are possibly not blameless in the failure. I doubt anyone would ever see Nissan, Chrysler, or many other companies ever make a good faith gesture like that.
 
Wow. 46,000 miles and it is seven years old! Get out and drive that thing more!
 
Of course I am joking there, but I cannot imagine putting that few miles on a car. I recently purchased a 1998 vehicle and it only had 108,000 miles on it. I thought, "Wohoo! A baby!"
#43 of 71
Re: rear differential in automatic Forester [xwesx] by aatherton
Oct 24, 2008 (3:23 pm)
Reply

Replying to: xwesx (Oct 24, 2008 2:27 pm)

"... 46,000 miles and it is seven years old! Get out and drive that thing more! Of course I am joking there, but I cannot imagine putting that few miles on a car..."
 
My Forester will be a year old next month and has 7,100 miles. Easy if you don't commute to a school or job.
#44 of 71
Re: rear differential in automatic Forester [aatherton] by paisan
Oct 27, 2008 (7:24 pm)
Reply

Replying to: aatherton (Oct 24, 2008 3:23 pm)

I bought my 05 LGT in July 07 with 30k miles. I now have 70k on it.
 
-mike
Motorsports and Modifications Host
#45 of 71
Opposite end of the Spectrum by anythngbutgm
Oct 31, 2008 (8:13 am)
Reply
My wife's business partner bought one of the first Mercedes CLS500's back in 2004 and just sold it with 190,000 miles on it. Even crazier is that the first 120,000 came in the first two years of owning it! Then he bought a second car to keep the miles off the Benz.
#46 of 71
Thread by ateixeira
Nov 05, 2008 (2:02 pm)
Reply
All bad luck, no. This is a problems thread and those with bad luck seek it out, and complain here.
 
We've had about 7 Subarus in my family and zero transmission problems. I just happen to subscribe to all the Subaru threads. No bad luck here, though.
#47 of 71
Subaru Transmission problem by chelley
Mar 28, 2009 (7:05 am)
Reply
My 99 Subaru Forrester is doing the same thing. When I shift it into first I have to rev the engine to get it to slip into gear. I have to come to a stop very carefully, almost let it glide to a stop on it's own (without using much break) or it will slip out of gear. I have been doing some research on line. Most say to try flushing the transmission fluid, but it does not seem to be working for most people. The only other option I have come across is to get a new transmission, which is not an option for most people as it's to expensive to have done. Clearly, this is a problem Subaru has seen and decided to ignore as it seems to happen to way to many of their cars to be a coincidence. If anyone has a less expensive fix than replacing the transmission or buying a new car, I would be interested in hearing it.
#48 of 71
Re: Thread [ateixeira] by chelley
Mar 28, 2009 (7:16 am)
Reply

Replying to: ateixeira (Nov 05, 2008 2:02 pm)

Most of these people went online to find an answer to a problem, not to complain. If we don't state our problem, how are we supposed to get an answer? This is one link of many for this exact problem. Kinda makes me believe there's more to it than just people complaining.
#49 of 71
Re: Thread [chelley] by xwesx
Mar 31, 2009 (1:57 pm)
Reply

Replying to: chelley (Mar 28, 2009 7:16 am)

There was certainly a higher incidence of transmission issues on the '99 Outback, but I am not sure if the '99 Forester's transmission was similarly changed from previous years (or 'year', in the case of the Forester!). I am not sure of the cause of these increased failures, but from my time here over the years, I see most reports of failures on '99 models.
#50 of 71
Re: Thread [xwesx] by ateixeira
Apr 03, 2009 (10:19 am)
Reply

Replying to: xwesx (Mar 31, 2009 1:57 pm)

Hard to say but every other year or so we'd hear about enhancements made to the automatics. Usually in the programming, though, I'm not sure if the internals changed much.

Messages Page 5 of 7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement