Sign In Join 



Chevy Tahoe/GMC Yukon Hybrid

301 messages,  Last post on Nov 23, 2009 at 10:58 AM

You are in the Chevrolet Tahoe and GMC Yukon Hybrid Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Chevrolet Tahoe Hybrid, GMC Yukon Hybrid, Hybrid Cars, SUV


Messages Page 5 of 30
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
30
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#41 of 301
Hybrid Real Cost by galvang
Sep 21, 2007 (9:53 pm)
Reply
Based on what the buyer would get on a hybid you are getting quite a bit of extra standard accessories such as NAV, rear camera and othe goodies. So the 10k adder is probaly in comparison to a stripped down Yukon with no extras. So you need to look at the number closely.
#42 of 301
Re: Hybrid Real Cost [galvang] by pf_flyer HOST
Sep 22, 2007 (3:42 am)
Reply

Replying to: galvang (Sep 21, 2007 9:53 pm)

With the mileage numbers some of the new hybrid coming out are offering, you have to look real close at the numbers!
 
A Forbes.com article on the least efficient hybrids and the dreaded "hybrid premium" are the subject of today's Alternate Route entry, Boon or Bane?
#43 of 301
Re: Hybrid Real Cost [galvang] by tourguide
Sep 23, 2007 (7:57 pm)
Reply

Replying to: galvang (Sep 21, 2007 9:53 pm)

So the 10k adder is probaly in comparison to a stripped down Yukon with no extras.
 
Negative.
 
The 10K extra is for the cost of the two mode system and all it's components. GM has stated this publicly, it is not a hidden thing, although they have not shouted about it either.
 
It sounds like they are positioning the hybrid version as a high-end luxo model that you HAVE to take the extra goodies on. It probably will make it easier to bury the extra cost to the consumer inside this price tag. Nobody is really sure exactly how much GM is going to cover but they will pass on all they figure people will swallow - you can bet on that.
 
I give this model the thumbs DOWN. NO WAY am I paying north of 8 franklins a month to lease one of these monsters - forget it.
 
I'm buying a used full size and pocket the difference.
#44 of 301
Re: Hybrid Real Cost [tourguide] by gagrice
Sep 24, 2007 (6:12 am)
Reply

Replying to: tourguide (Sep 23, 2007 7:57 pm)


I'm buying a used full size and pocket the difference.

 
I'm with you on that note. I see NOTHING offered in the USA that is worth the price asked new. Buy a 12-18 month old vehicle with very low miles and save 20%-30% or more.
 
You think the GM hybrid premium is high. Check out the crazy premium on any Lexus hybrid. Up to $25,000 more for the LS600h.
#45 of 301
Re: Hybrid Real Cost [gagrice] by JBaumgart
Sep 24, 2007 (6:41 am)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Sep 24, 2007 6:12 am)

So you guys are not "green" or is it you're just not "green with envy"?
 
 
#46 of 301
Re: Hybrid Real Cost [JBaumgart] by gagrice
Sep 24, 2007 (7:47 am)
Reply

Replying to: JBaumgart (Sep 24, 2007 6:41 am)

The green in hybrid is still very much open for debate. Though I suppose one of the other threads would be more appropriate.
#47 of 301
Re: Hybrid Real Cost [JBaumgart] by nedzel
Sep 24, 2007 (9:15 am)
Reply

Replying to: JBaumgart (Sep 24, 2007 6:41 am)

Green?
 
Is someone who buys a Lexus LS600h green, even though his car 1) costs a lot more, 2) is no faster, and 3) gets poorer gas mileage than someone who buys an LS460?
 
We'll have to wait and see on the Tahoe to learn 1) what the real-world mileage is and 2) how much it costs, before we know whether it makes economic sense.
 
I suspect what may make more sense for me is to keep my gas sucking 4Runner, but get a Chevy Volt as a commuter. If, of course, the Volt ends up meeting the expectations...
#48 of 301
Re: Hybrid Real Cost [nedzel] by JBaumgart
Sep 24, 2007 (11:30 am)
Reply

Replying to: nedzel (Sep 24, 2007 9:15 am)

You guys may have not noticed the wink [ ] in my post above - I was guessing it was the latter of the two, that you are not green with envy over the hybrid option.
#49 of 301
Re: Hybrid Real Cost [JBaumgart] by galvang
Sep 24, 2007 (9:53 pm)
Reply

Replying to: JBaumgart (Sep 24, 2007 11:30 am)

GM and other car mfg. are setting up the hybrid to be a failure. They are being heavily subsidized by the oil companies to not to proceed with fuel efficent vehicles.
 
Who is going to win this struggle eventualy will be the Europeans. As they are much more ahead in terms of small diesel technology then integrating them with hybrids in the near future. Its not too late GM to get in the ball game.
 
As for the 10K adder I have never heard of GM mention what the 10k adder was to what. The Yukon Hybrid will be packaged as a luxo SUV with many goodies. A SWAG about mid to upper 40k's.
#50 of 301
Re: Hybrid Real Cost [galvang] by JBaumgart
Sep 25, 2007 (5:52 am)
Reply

Replying to: galvang (Sep 24, 2007 9:53 pm)

"GM and other car mfg. are setting up the hybrid to be a failure. They are being heavily subsidized by the oil companies to not to proceed with fuel efficent vehicles."
 
Do you have any documented proof of this?
 
GM would LOVE to be able to build a Tahoe/Yukon hybrid that would average 30 mpg. Even if it were technologically possible today, it would be so expensive that nobody would want to buy one. As it is, people are complaining about the expected $10k markup. If the '08 model did get 30 mpg with just a $10k markup, it would certainly be attracting a lot more interest.

Messages Page 5 of 30
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
30
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement