Sign In Join 



Chevy Tahoe/GMC Yukon Hybrid

301 messages,  Last post on Nov 23, 2009 at 10:58 AM

You are in the Chevrolet Tahoe and GMC Yukon Hybrid Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Chevrolet Tahoe Hybrid, GMC Yukon Hybrid, Hybrid Cars, SUV


Messages Page 13 of 31
1
...
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
...
31
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#115 of 301
Re: Pricing for Tahoe/ Yukon Hybrids not expected to be at a premium [JBaumgart] by kylechoffman
Nov 02, 2007 (11:35 am)
Reply

Replying to: JBaumgart (Nov 02, 2007 7:46 am)

Pricing to start 40-45K - not the super sized premiums like the lexus is asking for.
#116 of 301
Re: Pricing for Tahoe/ Yukon Hybrids not expected to be at a premium [kylec by larsb
Nov 02, 2007 (1:46 pm)
Reply

Replying to: kylechoffman (Nov 02, 2007 11:35 am)

we'll see about that when the vehicles actually hit the lots.
 
The Prius also came with a low MSRP but the DEALERS were gouging customers with large markups.
#117 of 301
Re: Pricing for Tahoe/ Yukon Hybrids not expected to be at a premium [kylec [larsb] by kylechoffman
Nov 02, 2007 (2:59 pm)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Nov 02, 2007 1:46 pm)

True but lets see how they gouge those of us with employee pricing or supplier pricing.. Im sure they will try
#118 of 301
Re: Pricing for Tahoe/ Yukon Hybrids not expected to be at a premium [JBaumgart] by galvang
Nov 03, 2007 (11:13 pm)
Reply

Replying to: JBaumgart (Nov 02, 2007 7:46 am)

"Also I now hear that the introduction is delayed until the 1st Quarter of 2008? Originally it was supposed to be this quarter. Anyone know what caused the delay? "
 
I talked to a local dealer he said the same thing. I haven't heard anything official from GM. GM has a product brochure for the hybrid.
 
As for the price, it sounds encouraging. This one is at the top of my list.
#119 of 301
Re: Pricing for Tahoe/ Yukon Hybrids not expected to be at a premium [galvang] by ryanbab
Nov 07, 2007 (5:58 pm)
Reply

Replying to: galvang (Nov 03, 2007 11:13 pm)

I seen a truckload of the new Tahoe Hybrids on I465 (going north) in Indianapolis last week. I have been waiting on pricing and latest I seen is the hybrid wont be released until Dec but after seeing a truckload I am wondering where they were going.
#120 of 301
chevy tahoe gmc yukon hybrid by pear69
Nov 07, 2007 (10:26 pm)
Reply
I haven't read all the posts on this new tahoe, but I want to say something about the mechanical aspect of an 8 cylinder motor that shuts off 2 or 4 cylinders at any point during it's running time or it's heat cycle.
  Any internal combustion engine creates a lot of heat. All the parts of an engine go through a heat cycle where they expand and contract. A part that is round at room temperature is not round at 300 degrees.
  The reason I say this, is this; the cylinder bore that the piston goes up and down in is supposed to be round;;it's machined that way. The way it stays round is this,,there is holes drilled around the round cylinder which pass coolant or antifreeze through, thus evenly cooling the round cylinder bore that the piston lives in.
  In the chevy v8 the cylinders are set up in two rows of four. If you shut off 2 or 4 of these cylinders these cylinders will become unround or oval shape because of the heat that will be transfored from the cylinders that are working and creating a lot of heat.
  If you think the intake gasket leak problem on all chevy tahoes was bad wait until you see entire motors failing. I will say it will take about 50,000 or 60,000 miles and you will see severe engine damage and catistrofic engine failure....This motor is destined for the discovery channels'show "engineering failures"
#121 of 301
Re: chevy tahoe gmc yukon hybrid [pear69] by gagrice
Nov 08, 2007 (6:00 am)
Reply

Replying to: pear69 (Nov 07, 2007 10:26 pm)

Welcome to the Forum,
I think your analysis has some good theory behind it. This is not a new way of trying to save gas. Honda has a V6 in their Odyssey and not sure what else with VCM. I have not read of any early failures yet. I am a keep it simple kind of guy so I would probably not be interested in such an engine.
#122 of 301
Re: chevy tahoe gmc yukon hybrid [pear69] by stevedebi
Nov 08, 2007 (12:11 pm)
Reply

Replying to: pear69 (Nov 07, 2007 10:26 pm)

" In the chevy v8 the cylinders are set up in two rows of four. If you shut off 2 or 4 of these cylinders these cylinders will become unround or oval shape because of the heat that will be transfored from the cylinders that are working and creating a lot of heat."
 
I don't think this will be a problem. The cylinders deactivate and reactivate continuously. I suppose in theory if one was going down a VERY long slope the cylinders might shut down for a few minutes, but in general the problem most people have always had with variable cylinder usage is that they don't shut down frequently enough to really help MPG. The moment extra power is required, even momentarily, the cylinders come back on line.
 
However, this marks the first use in hybrid applications, so maybe they will shut down more. But considering the heavy weight of the Tahoe, it is very likely that all cylinders will be active much of the time.
 
Also, we don't know how Chevy programmed the engine. It may well be that it is not the SAME cylinders shutting down - they may alternate, which spreads the heat around.
#123 of 301
Re: chevy tahoe gmc yukon hybrid [stevedebi] by galvang
Nov 08, 2007 (6:49 pm)
Reply

Replying to: stevedebi (Nov 08, 2007 12:11 pm)

In terms of “cylinder deactivation”, GM are not a bunch of incompetent bozos (though sometimes I wonder), they have pretty sophisticated design tools and test methodologies to insure long term reliability for their engines. More than likely, they have simulation super computers to determine stress areas in their engine under certain conditions. Also they probably have thermal imaging equipment to determine hot spots internally in their engine such that they can determine latent engine failures. The one area I value the most which I know GM completes is “real life” testing, where they can test their engines under the “real world” conditions (temp, load, etc). These tests usually determine a life of an engine and helps validates some of the initial simulations done by computer or determine unforeseen failures.
 
I agree above, “Cylinder deactivation” is only on when the engine is in very light loading conditions (going down hill, cruising on the highway. etc). So heat being generated is pretty minimal. If the vehicle is towing or if the vehicle is accelerating, the internal engine software will activate all of the cylinders and the heat distribution in the engine will be some what even. .
 
To this day I have not heard any latent catastrophic failures with the 5.3LV8 engines. I checked NHTSA and their defects website and it shows nothing. Also GM has a 100K mile powertrain warranty which covers the engine for that length of mileage. They wouldn’t guaranty the life the engine if they had some real test data that didn’t support it. If the engine fails you could always have it replaced. So I wouldn’t worry about it.
 
I received official notice that GM has pushed out the Hybrid Yukon till early next year. Must be having some sort of problem.
#124 of 301
Re: chevy tahoe gmc yukon hybrid [galvang] by stevedebi
Nov 09, 2007 (9:21 am)
Reply

Replying to: galvang (Nov 08, 2007 6:49 pm)

"I received official notice that GM has pushed out the Hybrid Yukon till early next year. Must be having some sort of problem."
 
(The GMC site doesn't list the weight of the Yukon, but I'm guessing it is 5500 lbs or maybe more...)
 
I actually wonder if the "problem" isn't that this class of vehicle is too heavy for hybridization to provide a real benefit, other than shutting down the engine when stopped. That is what happened to the hybrid pickup - no real MPG savings. Of course the pickup had the 110v electric capability which may have been useful to some owners.
 
Dual mode doesn't provide as much benefit to a large and heavy vehicle; the electric motors deplete very quickly due to the large amount of weight that has to be accelerated.
 
With heavy vehicles the situation degrades to the point that it would take too much battery to provide enough boost, and then one has to remember that the battery adds weight and takes up room as well. AND hybrid components are complex and expensive. Some people assume that LiIon batteries will be the answer, but I'm not convinced that the recharging/heat problems of this technology will be overcome any time soon.

Messages Page 13 of 31
1
...
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
...
31
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement