Sign In Join 



Chevy Tahoe/GMC Yukon Hybrid

301 messages,  Last post on Nov 23, 2009 at 10:58 AM

You are in the Chevrolet Tahoe and GMC Yukon Hybrid Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Chevrolet Tahoe Hybrid, GMC Yukon Hybrid, Hybrid Cars, SUV


Messages Page 2 of 30
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
30
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#12 of 301
Finally some good competiton for GM! by u045777
Jul 14, 2007 (12:28 am)
Reply
http://www.caranddriver.com/carnews/13300/spied-2009-toyota-sequoia.html
 
In page 2 of the the article above it says that the new 2009 Sequoia hybrid will be the Flagship of Toyota's line. Buyers will be able to choose either V6, V8, or Hybrid.
 
The size of the new Sequoia appears slightly bigger than the Tahoe but smaller than a Suburban.
 
I'm betting that the Sequoia Hybrid will blow the doors off the Tahoe Hybrid in MPGs and reliability.
 
Soon well have a choice: Tahoe Hybrid or Sequoia Hybrid! I can't wait
#13 of 301
Re: Finally some good competiton for GM! [u045777] by gagrice
Jul 14, 2007 (8:17 am)
Reply

Replying to: u045777 (Jul 14, 2007 12:28 am)

I would say it will have the same HSD that is in the LS600h. So figure at least $75,000 for the FLAGSHIP Sequoia. If you don't mind paying $30k premium for a hybrid as is the case with the LS600h go for it. Figure on less than the 21 MPG rating the LS600h has. A Sequoia that gets 19 MPG would be a 22% improvement. Don't expect it to match the Tahoe Hybrid mileage. It ain't gonna happen.
#14 of 301
Re: Finally some good competiton for GM! [gagrice] by tourguide
Jul 26, 2007 (5:32 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Jul 14, 2007 8:17 am)

I'll agree with what you've said here - cost is going to be REALLY high on this model. As much as I'd love a full size suv that gets a combined 20mpg, I just think it costs too much. You take a vehicle that is a $40K ticket already and add another 10% to the price tag, plus all the added complexity which will likely translate to worse than average reilability. I think I'm going to stay away from this one.
 
Besides which, people are being mighty optomistic about the "projected" performance here. These things will not defy the laws of physics, and real world numbers are likely to come in below the predicted economy values.
 
Nope - I'm going to buy used next time and wait this product cycle out.
#15 of 301
Test Drive by chevyvolt
Jul 27, 2007 (9:47 am)
Reply
I had a chance to test-drive the car. Read review here:
http://www.gm-volt.com/2007/07/26/its-big-its-tough-its-powerfulits-a-hybrid-gmc- -yukon-hybrid-test-drive/
#16 of 301
Re: Test Drive [chevyvolt] by stevedebi
Jul 27, 2007 (1:34 pm)
Reply

Replying to: chevyvolt (Jul 27, 2007 9:47 am)

"I had a chance to test-drive the car. Read review here: "
 
Your statements about the Prius are incorrect. The electric motor assists the engine when needed at all speeds; it is never disconnected (unless the battery becomes depleted, which is a rare event, but in any case it is not designed to disengage the electric motors and run on ICE-only at higher speeds).
 
I haven't studied these full size GM setups, but if they truly have two electric motors, one for slow and one for fast speeds, they are really wasting space and weight. Usually "dual mode" means that the vehicle can run on electricity alone (while the battery lasts) or on combined electric/ICE.
#17 of 301
Decisions.... by JBaumgart
Jul 27, 2007 (5:25 pm)
Reply
I need a vehicle with good towing capability, rated to at least 5,000 lbs., but would also like it to get decent mileage. No real hurry to buy. The Tahoe/Yukon hybrids will certainly be worth a close look. I hope the 08's have better materials and more real luxury on the inside that past models. The other vehicle I'm looking at closely is the Acura MDX - probably more luxury but not as good of a tow vehicle and marginally worse mileage. But I would have more confidence in it from a reliabilty standpoint than a first year GM product with brand new technology.
#18 of 301
High hp engine defeats the purpose of hybrid/good mileage by chadx
Aug 02, 2007 (10:52 am)
Reply
I love the idea of the new Hybrid Tahoe. I drive a 2003 Avalanche and am excited that GM has decided to make a full size SUV Hybrid. What I don't understand is why they are using a 6.0 liter engine in the hybrid rather than the 5.3 liter in the non-hybrid. Yes the 6.0L is aluminim and saves weight, but why not use a 5.3 or 4.8 liter aluminum blocked engine. And over 300 horsepower? What is the point? If the hp rating were reduced to 260, which is still plenty for this vehicle (after all, it's a hybrid and supposed to get great mileage not win quarter mile acceleration test), you would have a winner because the mileage could be much better.
 
I guess I don't understand the horsepower wars. In the late 70s and 80s, 200 hp was plenty (granted those half-ton trucks weighed considerably less). Come on GM and use a reasonable engine (maybe even a V6 or your inline 5-cylinder) and get a usable and great mileage vehicle.
 
The 285hp in my 03 Avalanche has been plenty even when towing heavy loads. Give me a Hybrid Avalanche/Tahoe/Suburban with a V6 or inline-5 that gets better highway mileage and not just better city mileage and we will buy. Don't stay caught up in the unfortunate "horsepower wars" that manufactures love so much. Gear your hybrid toward better mileage rather than worrying about it still accelerating like the non-hybrid Tahoe. If I wanted that, I'd buy that. Make a hybrid that holds to the original spirit of a hybrid. Good mileage.
#19 of 301
Re: High hp engine defeats the purpose of hybrid/good mileage [chadx] by tourguide
Aug 02, 2007 (7:58 pm)
Reply

Replying to: chadx (Aug 02, 2007 10:52 am)

"And over 300 horsepower? What is the point?"
 
The decision on which engine to use has already been made. The hybrid is getting the 6.0L. My guess as to why this is so, is probably because they need the greater displacement to carry the vehicle when it kicks into V4 mode. This is just my guess of course, but it is a LOT of vehicle to move.
 
Part of the problem too is these vehicles have developed a certain brawny reputation, and in order to sell them new models need to follow suit.
 
No matter what, plan on a payment hovering near or significantly above $800 per month. (Fuel NOT included)
#20 of 301
Re: High hp engine defeats the purpose of hybrid/good mileage [tourguide] by larsb
Aug 03, 2007 (6:16 am)
Reply

Replying to: tourguide (Aug 02, 2007 7:58 pm)

For the larger engine, in part, they chose that because they want the vehicles to be able to tow larger items.
 
Most hybrid SUVs up to now CANNOT TOW AT ALL, so GM wanted to be the first with significant towing power.
 
A Very Good idea it was IMHO.

Messages Page 2 of 30
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
30
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement